ChaseDream

标题: OG100 [打印本页]

作者: paopao 时间: 2004-6-26 07:59
标题: OG100

100. Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.

(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills（C）

(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

Choice C is the best answer. Either of the following constructions would be idiomatic here: x forbids y to do z or x prohibits y from doing z. （固定用法） Choices A and B violate idiom; D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. （不合规则） Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical. （不合逻辑）

划线的部分没有读懂请大家帮助谢谢

作者: tianwan 时间: 2004-6-26 13:41

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=21126

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=28517

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=4603

Besids, you can use "paopao 重登录隐身用户控制面板搜索风格论坛状态梦网语聊首页下载中心退出" to search posts you need. It's convenient and fast.

作者: paopao 时间: 2004-7-15 07:28

谢谢tianwan

查了以前的讨论仍然不理解

（我觉得主要是句子意思，BANS是禁止一种行为，这种行为应该是“landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings ”，而不是CANNOT，否则就变成支持它了，双重否定。由于THAT 后的成分是完整的, THAT从句只能看成同位语, 但语意上不合逻辑, 禁止...不被接受, 那就是要接受LEAVES ETC）

我的问题是

实行禁令这个禁令不让垃圾场接受树子等不会出现不合逻辑双重否定的现象啊因为是同位语所以翻起来应该是

实行禁令这个禁令不让垃圾场接受树子等

错误是不是因为不能用cannot 必须要用must not

另外 OG语法上不对为何不对是否只能用分词修饰

谢谢

作者: rt316 时间: 2004-7-15 09:29
举个例子，到底是Charlie has been banned from driving for a year.正确还是Charlie has been banned from not driving for a year.正确？答案是前者。所以ban和cannot形成双重否定，结果反而是肯定，即禁止‘不接受垃圾’，变成‘应该接受垃圾’。ban + that从句，从句就是ban的内容，也即ban的对象。再比如： I permit that ... that从句表示同意(permit)的内容，同理，ban that，that从句是禁止(ban)的内容。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-15 9:36:07编辑过]

作者: henry_guo1982 时间: 2006-12-27 17:03

Nonsense! Please notice that ban is a noun here.

作者: lanyuqi 时间: 2006-12-28 00:54
对啊，ban 是名词，那么that 就是引导同位语啊，不能和permit 一样啊？

作者: lanyuqi 时间: 2006-12-28 01:26

牛牛给解答一下把。

作者: sat_frank 时间: 2007-4-13 11:12

难道就是不能用从句,有这么无聊么?

作者: huangyh03 时间: 2007-10-25 13:13

以下是引用rt316在2004-7-15 9:29:00的发言：
举个例子，到底是Charlie has been banned from driving for a year.正确还是Charlie has been banned from not driving for a year.正确？答案是前者。所以ban和cannot形成双重否定，结果反而是肯定，即禁止‘不接受垃圾’，变成‘应该接受垃圾’。ban + that从句，从句就是ban的内容，也即ban的对象。再比如： I permit that ... that从句表示同意(permit)的内容，同理，ban that，that从句是禁止(ban)的内容。

反对一下，你说的ban在这里是动词，接that宾语从句，按你的说法是没有问题的，但这道题里ban是名词后接同位语从句，和你所说的情况不同

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)