ChaseDream

标题: 再问大全540 [打印本页]

作者: juan 时间: 2004-6-25 04:02
标题: 再问大全540

Nowhere in Prakta is the influence of modern European architecture more apparent than their government buildings.

(A) more apparent than their

(B) so apparent as their

(D) so apparent than in their C

(E) as apparent as it is in its

答案没问题。排除法很快可得C。

多想了一下：

这题要是改成正序应该是： The influence of....is more apparent nowhere in Prakta than in its government buildings. 突然觉得 is more apparent nowhere in P很怪？题意是the influence is apparent在某个地方......，所以apparent后用in.....这里显然是nowhere做n. nowhere in Prakta...那么in为什么不是放在nowhere前，而是放在nowhere 后呢？

谢谢指点。

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-25 4:07:07编辑过]

作者: vincent0330 时间: 2004-6-25 06:12

你应该把 more apparent nowhere.....than 一起看.....

(再也没有任何地方比government buildings来得更apparent

就好像 I can't agree you more 一样的道理.....

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-25 6:15:14编辑过]

作者: rt316 时间: 2004-6-25 06:28
我想这个句子的正常语序应该是：The influence of modern European architecture is more apparent in Prakta's government buildings than in anywhere else in Prakta. 或 The influence of modern European architecture in prakta's government is more apparent than in anywhere else in Prakta.

作者: juan 时间: 2004-6-25 06:33

谢谢狗狗.

再请教:

你的意思是这个句子的结构应该是 :

The influence of....is (more apparent nowhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings 吗?

那么这里nowhere是做名词还是副词呢?如果是副词的话,修饰哪个的呢?

谢谢先了.

作者: juan 时间: 2004-6-25 06:43

以下是引用stoneren在2004-6-25 6:28:00的发言：
我想这个句子的正常语序应该是：The influence of modern European architecture is more apparent in Prakta's government buildings than in anywhere else in Prakta. 或 The influence of modern European architecture in prakta's government is more apparent than in anywhere else in Prakta.

谢谢stoneren.

你这么一正序,逻辑意思和原来是一样的.可nowhere不见了呀?

谢谢指点.

作者: rt316 时间: 2004-6-25 06:43

有点类似逻辑中的not；

举个例子：No one can do this. 相当于Everyone cannot do this.

No A is more than B. 相当于B is more than A 或 A is not more than B

作者: juan 时间: 2004-6-25 08:40

逻辑意思上这么改是没错的,可是语法上,我挺困惑nowhere的成分?做名词的话,就该和in P一起看, nowhere in P,可这样的话,怎么apparent in的in不是放在nowhere 前,而是在nowhere后呢?如果象狗狗说的,要把nowhere和前面的no apparent一起看的话,nowhere是什么成分呢?做副词吗?

继续请教中......

作者: dashasha 时间: 2004-6-25 09:19
juan mm，我觉得nowhere这里是副词。

作者: vincent0330 时间: 2004-6-25 09:34

以下是引用juan在2004-6-25 6:33:00的发言：

谢谢狗狗.

再请教:

你的意思是这个句子的结构应该是 :

The influence of....is (more apparent nowhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings 吗?

那么这里nowhere是做名词还是副词呢?如果是副词的话,修饰哪个的呢?

谢谢先了.

同前面stoneren讲的:

The influence of....is not (more apparent everywhere) in Prakta than in its government buildings

至于词性则为副词, 同dashasha

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2004-6-25 11:31
偶同意你改的语序:The influence of....is more apparent nowhere in Prakta than in its government buildings.
nowhere是为了强调在prakta的任何地方都不比government buildings 更apparent. 做副词前面不能加介词,就像中学时学的home一样, go home而不是go to home

作者: juan 时间: 2004-6-25 11:34

终于明白了.谢谢狗狗,stoneren,还有dashasha MM和marie MM.

可是marie MM举go home的例子用来说明副词前不加介词,所以不是go to home.你的意思是这里home是副词?

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-25 11:38:02编辑过]

作者: juan 时间: 2004-6-25 11:39

我真是stupid.....查了字典,go home里home就是adv.

谢谢marie MM提醒.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-25 11:40:07编辑过]

作者: 唐三彩 时间: 2004-6-25 11:48

用In是因为对应前面的Influence，所以在比较Than后面也需要补出来，即对比nowhere in P和in its building这2个壮语....

作者: superPPDD 时间: 2006-7-19 21:24

那么这道题为什么要补出it is呢

13.
It is as difficult to prevent crimes against property as those that are against a person.

(A) those that are against a

(B) those against a

(D) preventing those against a（E）

(E) it is to prevent those against a

作者: oremping 时间: 2006-8-24 03:54
up

作者: oremping 时间: 2006-8-25 04:33

那么这道题为什么要补出it is呢

13.
It is as difficult to prevent crimes against property as those that are against a person.

(E) it is to prevent those against a

作者: yboo 时间: 2006-8-25 05:17
"13.
It is as difficult to prevent crimes against property as those that are against a person. (E) it is to prevent those against a"

here "it is" really doesnt matter, and can be omitted.

btw, the original problem (in normal format):
"The influence of....is more apparent nowhere in Prakta than in its government buildings."

nowhere (adj.) = not IN any place. it is this IN that corresponds to the IN in "in its government buildings", instead of the IN in "in Prakta".

my 2 cents.

作者: nickynicky 时间: 2007-6-23 17:12

以下是引用唐三彩在2004-6-25 11:48:00的发言：

用In是因为对应前面的Influence，所以在比较Than后面也需要补出来，即对比nowhere in P和in its building这2个壮语....

influence should use "on", not "in"????

作者: suffisait 时间: 2007-11-12 10:49

the infulence is not more apparent anywhere in P than in government.

It is as difficult to prevent crimes against property as it is to prevent those against ....

这里比较的对象都是主语，为什么第一个influence可以省略而第二个就不省略哪？？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)