ChaseDream

标题: 求教GWD一道逻辑题 [打印本页]

作者: adasuying2004 时间: 2011-6-13 02:17
标题: 求教GWD一道逻辑题
Q10:TTGWD11-Q30:
Editorial: In Ledland, unemployed adults receive government assistance. To reduce unemployment, the government proposes to supplement the income of those who accept jobs that pay less than government assistance, thus enabling employers to hire workers cheaply. However, the supplement will not raise any worker’s income above what government assistance would provide if he or she were not gainfully employed. Therefore, unemployed people will have no financial incentive to accept jobs that would entitle them to the supplement.
Which of the following, if true about Ledland, most seriously weakens the argument of the editorial?
A.   The government collects no taxes on assistance it provides to unemployed individuals and their families.
B.   Neighboring countries with laws that mandate the minimum wage an employer must pay an employee have higher unemployment rates than Ledland currently has.
C.

eople who are employed and look for a new job tend to get higher-paying jobs than job seekers who are unemployed.
D. The yearly amount unemployed people receive from government assistance is less than the yearly income that the government defines as the poverty level.
E.

eople sometimes accept jobs that pay relatively little simply because they enjoy the work.

为啥是C非E。。。。C跟正文有啥关系。。。

作者: camelo777 时间: 2011-6-13 02:35
E没有关系，结论是unemployed people没有financial incentive 去接受这个job。所以你的回答应该和financial incentive有关，C选项说有工作的人再去找工作的话通常会比没有工作的人得到更高的pay，这也就给了那些unemployed people一个financial incentive，虽然你现在接受的这个job 工资不高，但是你有了工作以后再去找新工作就会得到更高的收入，这就削弱了原文的结论。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)