ChaseDream

标题: 07prep-1-31 (坛子里没有讨论过时态)麻烦NN解答! [打印本页]

作者: hraggie 时间: 2011-6-12 15:50
标题: 07prep-1-31 (坛子里没有讨论过时态)麻烦NN解答!

31.(26141-!-item-!-188;#058&002444)

According to some economists, the July decrease in unemployment so that it was the lowest in two years suggests that the gradual improvement in the job market is continuing.

(A) so that it was the lowest in two years

(B) so that it was the lowest two-year rate

(D) to a two-year low level

(E) to the lowest level in two years

考点: 简洁有效（Rhetorical Construction）
1) so that可以修饰动作,但不能修饰名词,例: I stopped so that you could catch up.

(A) so that不能修饰名词the decrease
(B) 错误同A选项；lowest two-year rate改变了原意。
(C) would表现将来的某一种情况,而原句表现的是已经被大家所知的一个事实, 因此would的使用
不正确; to what would be…结构复杂
(D) two-year low level不符合习惯用法,且意思模糊
(E) 正确, 使用了正确的表达方式: decrease… to the lowest level

我选了C,in two years不是表示未来两年即将发生的意思吗? 词典例句

ur life situation will be improved in two years.
如果表示过去两年的最低点,是不是应该用the lowest level of the past two years?一直没明白,还请NN帮忙解答!

作者: jameshzd 时间: 2011-6-12 16:13
楼主，你说的our life situation will be improved in two years，in 的含义时在（某段时间）之后，但是不是说 in two years 的固定搭配非要是将来时态，同样是可以用于过去式的： she learnt to drive in three weeks( after three weeks she could drive ).
在看这题，C选项说在未来的的两年里，the July decrease in unemployment 达到最低，你觉得逻辑意思说的通吗？未来两年都没发生啊，怎么能判断是最低呢？并且也不应该用 would，要用也是用 will 啊。
不知道我讲清楚没，希望对你有启发啊~~

作者: hraggie 时间: 2011-6-13 09:17

楼主，你说的our life situation will be improved in two years，in 的含义时在（某段时间）之后，但是不是说 in two years 的固定搭配非要是将来时态，同样是可以用于过去式的： she learnt to drive in three weeks( after three weeks she could drive ).
在看这题，C选项说在未来的的两年里，the July decrease in unemployment 达到最低，你觉得逻辑意思说的通吗？未来两年都没发生啊，怎么能判断是最低呢？并且也不应该用 would，要用也是用 will 啊。
不知道我讲清楚没，希望对你有启发啊~~

-- by 会员 jameshzd (2011/6/12 16:13:28)

明白了!!谢谢hameshzd!

作者: liwuruiyun 时间: 2015-8-28 19:40
谢谢解释。
具体情况具体分析。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)