标题: 一道逻辑题求解 [打印本页] 作者: maxth 时间: 2011-6-11 22:49 标题: 一道逻辑题求解 答案是B，不太明白，为什么不能是Ｄ或Ｅ，它装的都是易碎品自然也就没达标了。为什么选Ｂ这么专业的选项，谢谢 P488-9. In order to reduce the number of items damaged while in transit to customers, packaging consultants recommended that the TrueSave mail-order company increase the amount of packing material so as to fill any empty spaces in its cartons. Accordingly, TrueSave officials instructed the company’s packers to use more packing material than before, and the packers zealously acted on these instructions and used as much as they could. Nevertheless, customer reports of damaged items rose somewhat.
Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain why acting on the consultants’ recommendation failed to achieve its goal?
(A) The change in packing policy led to an increase in expenditure on packing material and labor.
(B) When packing material is compressed too densely, it loses some of its capacity to absorb shock.
(C) The amount of packing material used in a carton does not significantly influence the ease with which a customer can unpack the package.
(D) Most of the goods that TrueSave ships are electronic products that are highly vulnerable to being damaged in transit.
(E) TrueSave has lost some of its regular customers as a result of the high number of damaged items they received. 作者: helio5 时间: 2011-6-11 23:14
题目问题：什么能够解释为什么按咨询专家推荐的方法（包装货物）没有达到所期望的效果？(customer reports of damaged items rose) 专家推荐的包装方法是尽量多用包装材料来填满货物里面的空隙——结果是填得太实了——取得反效果（丧失吸收冲撞的能力） D选项只是说明快递公司运输的货物的属性——易碎品，未说明为什么顾客报告损毁的货物数量反而有所上升？（该快递公司在咨询包装专家前后运输的都是同一类商品） E选项更是和题目问题一点不相关作者: MarsTOF 时间: 2011-6-11 23:29
顶LS。。。