ChaseDream

标题: gwd-1-35,37 [打印本页]

作者: coolgirl    时间: 2004-6-23 05:26
标题: gwd-1-35,37

      In corporate purchasing,


            competitive scrutiny is typically


            limited to suppliers of items that are


Line     directly related to end products.


  (5)      With “indirect” purchases (such as


computers, advertising, and legal


services), which are not directly


related to production, corporations


often favor “supplier partnerships”


(10)     (arrangements in which the


purchaser forgoes the right to


pursue alternative suppliers), which


can inappropriately shelter suppliers


from rigorous competitive scrutiny


(15)     that might afford the purchaser


economic leverage.  There are two


independent variables—availability


of alternatives and ease of changing


suppliers—that companies should


(20)     use to evaluate the feasibility of


            subjecting suppliers of indirect


            purchases to competitive scrutiny.


This can create four possible


situations.


(25)           In Type 1 situations, there are


many alternatives and change is


relatively easy.  Open pursuit of


alternatives—by frequent com-


petitive bidding, if possible—will


(30)     likely yield the best results.  In


Type 2 situations, where there


are many alternatives but change


            is difficult—as for providers of


employee health-care benefits—it


(35)    is important to continuously test


the market and use the results to


secure concessions from existing


suppliers.  Alternatives provide a


           credible threat to suppliers, even if


(40)    the ability to switch is constrained.


In Type 3 situations, there ate few


alternatives, but the ability to switch


without difficulty creates a threat that


companies can use to negotiate


(45)     concessions from existing suppliers.


In Type 4 situations, where there


are few alternatives and change


is difficult, partnerships may be


unavoidable.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Q35:


Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?


                        



  • The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph.

  • The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.

  • The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph.

  • The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph.

  • The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.

  • 答案是c,可是我觉得是B,第二段说明有四种情况,其中一种情况才适用parnership,好像和答案c说的不是一回事。



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------


    Q37:


    According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?




  • The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny

  • The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company

  • The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company

  • The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product

  • The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations

  • 答案是e,可我觉得是d,在第一段中可以找到原话!


    大家帮忙看看,到底正确答案是什莫呢?


    作者: tianwan    时间: 2004-6-23 08:34

    Q35, B is wrong because of "an explanation for the occurrence of a situation "

    Q37, I agree with you.


    作者: robertchu    时间: 2004-6-23 09:33
    Q35: C.  
    The strategy is the second to last sentence in the first paragraph:"There are two independent variables—availability of alternatives andease of changing suppliers—that companies should use to evaluate thefeasibility of subjecting suppliers of indirect purchases tocompetitive scrutiny."

    Q37: Agree, D.


    作者: Ivy2004    时间: 2004-6-25 09:42

    Q37我也选了D.

    不过我阅读很菜的说.


    作者: weiyu    时间: 2004-6-25 15:50

    Thanks coolgirl.


    You confirm my answer on question 37. I make at least two mistakes, and now it seems that GWD's answer is wrong.


    作者: caterpillar    时间: 2004-7-10 04:11

    35.支持原答案C。

    37、支持D。


    作者: fair_sword    时间: 2004-7-20 08:33
    c, d
    作者: tony6    时间: 2004-8-15 00:45
    37不可能是E
    作者: linson    时间: 2004-8-16 01:12

    Q37。在原文中没有发现有关The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product,

    在选择时,我也选了D。后来发现在第一段括号内(arrangements in which the purchaser forgoes the right to pursue  alternative suppliers), 其中forgo the right, 我觉得是不是觉得indirect不重要,所以才放弃。这样来看E选项应该是对的。


    作者: LES    时间: 2004-8-24 18:08

    再问一下这篇文章的第36题:

    Q36:

    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

                  

    1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers.
    2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.
    3. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser.
    4. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products.
    5. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited.

    作者: 流沙    时间: 2004-9-5 15:50
    为什么我觉得37题de都能在文中找到对应那
    作者: miaoyin_tx    时间: 2004-9-14 06:29
    以下是引用流沙在2004-9-5 15:50:00的发言:
    为什么我觉得37题de都能在文中找到对应那


    文中第一段1-16行提到"directly relate to end of products"(4行direct purchasing ), "not directly related to prodcution"(7行)。 是否directly relate就是用来判断的标志。 如果not directly relate to the end of prodcuts, 那就是indirect purchasing. 象答案D中说的relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company's end product.


    我没有在文中看到答案E中所提到的degree of imporatance.


    作者: bigdog1220    时间: 2004-9-26 14:55
    标题: 回复:(LES)再问一下这篇文章的第36题:Q36:Which o...

    (10)     (arrangements in which the


    purchaser forgoes the right to


    pursue alternative suppliers), which


    can inappropriately shelter suppliers


    from rigorous competitive scrutiny


    (15)     that might afford the purchaser


    economic leverage.



    so answer to Q36 is B.


    作者: shingspirit    时间: 2004-10-4 14:59
    我选D, 为什么答案是B呢?
    作者: exan    时间: 2004-10-7 06:27
    以下是引用miaoyin_tx在2004-9-14 6:29:00的发言:



    文中第一段1-16行提到"directly relate to end of products"(4行direct purchasing ), "not directly related to prodcution"(7行)。 是否directly relate就是用来判断的标志。 如果not directly relate to the end of prodcuts, 那就是indirect purchasing. 象答案D中说的relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company's end product.


    我没有在文中看到答案E中所提到的degree of imporatance.



    agree!
    作者: sereny    时间: 2004-10-7 10:02

    With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production, corporations.....................

    that means the relationship between indirect purchases and production is not directly, so surely D is right


    作者: flying04    时间: 2004-10-9 01:12
    37, E   "which are not directlyrelatedto production" 与 “The     degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s     business operations” 对应。
    作者: 呆板彻底    时间: 2004-10-11 22:41

    37答案为d。

    such as computers, advertising, and legal services

    这三者和最终产品无直接联系,但是不能说不重要!


    作者: sandyclub    时间: 2004-10-14 05:13
    以下是引用sereny在2004-10-7 10:02:00的发言:

    With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production, corporations.....................


    that means the relationship between indirect purchases and production is not directly, so surely D is right



    击掌击掌  我也这么想  就是这一句话


      


    作者: rings    时间: 2004-10-17 14:40
    谁能说说这篇文章的大概意思啊,我被一些名词搞到头晕啊
    作者: almarabbit01    时间: 2004-10-22 23:58

    35: C

    37


    作者: asicschu    时间: 2004-11-1 16:33
    這樣我懂了!! 感謝大家的討論!!
    作者: skyalan    时间: 2005-1-16 01:03

    这题我最初选D,但是现在看也许是A!!!!


    首先GMAT阅读一定要在原文定位,E选项没有相关地方,排除;


    D的意思我一直不太明白“The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product”  有什么relationship好分?都是产品,就拿电脑来说,既是purchased item也是company's product呀


    在来看我的答案A The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny   


    文章开头第一句话告诉我们:In corporate purchasing, competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of  items that are directly related to end products,很像文章的答案诶。


    不过A最大的缺点就是它指的是direct products.唉


    作者: legendbird    时间: 2005-2-22 10:42

    36大概是选D的吧,文章的第一第二句话支出了supplier partnership只是在indirect purchase的情况下才适用

    文中没有讲在supplier partnership下purchase公司要多付钱啊,虽然有那么一点点小意思


    作者: tuzq    时间: 2005-2-25 12:13

    36选B,

    文章第一句只是是说competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of items that are directly related to end products,但没讲suppliers of items that are directly related to end products就不用 supplier parnership了。第二句说“indirect” purchases更favor supplier partnership,并不是说只有在这种情况下才用。所以D不对。

    B是对的,因为:“supplier partnerships” (..)which can inappropriately shelter suppliers from rigorous competitive scrutiny that might afford the purchaser economic leverage.


    作者: rivergirl    时间: 2005-4-9 15:10
    谁能告诉我37题到底选啥答案呢?
    作者: Dennies    时间: 2005-4-10 00:09

    还是要请教36题,实在感觉是一头雾水

    谢谢


    作者: leisure1221    时间: 2005-4-10 09:13
    35题为什么D不对呢,疑惑中。。。。。。
    作者: huamei    时间: 2005-5-2 04:26
    35不对的原因是第一段最后

    There are two

    independent variables—availability

    of alternatives and ease of changing

    suppliers—that companies should

    (20)      use to evaluate the feasibility of

           subjecting suppliers of indirect

           purchases to competitive scrutiny.

    This can create four possible

    situations.说明下一段是在讨论,也就是C,E中的discuss.而C中的discuss的内容是strategy的application在二段具体内容中有所体现


    作者: huamei    时间: 2005-5-2 08:40
    37xuan  d
    作者: 小女公子    时间: 2005-5-13 22:42

    我晕,发错地方了,惭愧惭愧……


    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-13 22:50:12编辑过]

    作者: ring_cheng    时间: 2005-5-17 18:22

    这是我对各题的理解,欢迎讨论:


    GWD-1-Q35:



    Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?              





    1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph. —>1P没有assertion,只是说明现实情况以及提出两种变量


    2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph. —>describe两种变量组合可以形成的不同采购策略,并非explanation


    3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph. —>a strategy 是泛指采购策略,并非特指competitive scrutiny 或是partnership application是指不同组合采用(应用)不同的采购策略


    4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph. —>第一段说partnership采购有问题,但2P没有论述其范围


    5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph. —>1P举出两种采购方式,并没有说这两种方式有矛盾


    (C)



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    GWD-1-Q36:



    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?               




    1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers. —>没有充分必要性


    2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation. —>L12-16 紧贴原文意思


    3. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser. —>文章中没说


    4. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products. —>没有when的充分必要性


    5. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited. —>最高级不妥


    (B)



    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



    GWD-1-Q37:



    According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?







    1. The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny —>与能力无关


    2. The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company


    3. The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company


    4. The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product —>原文的对比取非(直接采购是与最终商品联系,非直接采购是辅助性项目采观)


    5. The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations —>太过引申原文内容(过犹不及)你凭什么说直接采购就是重要的或是不重要的,原文并没有给出相关信息来判断
    (D)


    [此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-17 18:28:32编辑过]

    作者: marylou    时间: 2005-5-28 11:16
    标题: 这句话到底是什么意思

    corporations


    often favor “supplier partnerships”


    (10)      (arrangements in which the


    purchaser forgoes the right to


    pursue alternative suppliers), which


    can inappropriately shelter suppliers


    from rigorous competitive scrutiny


    (15)      that might afford the purchaser


    economic leverage.  


    请NN解释解释



    作者: cdg2004    时间: 2005-6-7 11:46
    以下是引用marylou在2005-5-28 11:16:00的发言:

    corporations


    often favor “supplier partnerships”


    (10)      (arrangements in which the


    purchaser forgoes the right to


    pursue alternative suppliers), which


    can inappropriately shelter suppliers


    from rigorous competitive scrutiny


    (15)      that might afford the purchaser


    economic leverage.  


    请NN解释解释




    对于间接采购,公司经常采用战略伙伴关系(即在这种关系中,采购人员不需要寻找可替换的供应商),这样就不恰当地使供应商逃避了的严格的竞争筛选,而这种筛选是能够为采购人员提供价格谈判优势的。


    作者: jaccicywoo    时间: 2005-6-14 09:11
    37题D
    作者: julia_ju    时间: 2005-6-14 10:21
    very very thk cdg2004!就是这句话怎么也看不明白。
    作者: marylou    时间: 2005-6-19 11:07
    多谢,明白了.
    作者: xxiaoyan    时间: 2005-8-25 16:18

    谁能帮忙解释一下37中a 的意思,实在不懂的说


    According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?








    1. The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny


    2. The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company



    3. The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company
    4. The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product


    5. The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations

    作者: xxiaoyan    时间: 2005-8-25 16:20
    似乎这篇文章的答案都在第一段,赫赫
    作者: yangxiaogang    时间: 2005-10-2 08:46

    这篇文章到底啥意思啊?


    作者: PKGMAT    时间: 2005-10-6 11:06

    在讲影响非直接采购策略的两个重要因素:可获取性难、易和易改变性难、易。二者组合有四种可能情况,分别导致四种不同的采购策略。


    作者: amacd    时间: 2005-10-25 19:41
    以下是引用ring_cheng在2005-5-17 18:22:00的发言:

    这是我对各题的理解,欢迎讨论:


    GWD-1-Q35:



    Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?              





    1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph. —>1P没有assertion,只是说明现实情况以及提出两种变量

    2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph. —>describe两种变量组合可以形成的不同采购策略,并非explanation



    3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph. —>a strategy 是泛指采购策略,并非特指competitive scrutiny 或是partnership application是指不同组合采用(应用)不同的采购策略


    4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph. —>第一段说partnership采购有问题,但2P没有论述其范围


    5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph. —>1P举出两种采购方式,并没有说这两种方式有矛盾


    (C)




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    GWD-1-Q36:




    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?               





    1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers. —>没有充分必要性


    2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation. —>L12-16 紧贴原文意思


    3. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser. —>文章中没说


    4. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products. —>没有when的充分必要性


    5. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited. —>最高级不妥


    (B)




    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------




    GWD-1-Q37:




    According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?








    1. The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny —>与能力无关


    2. The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company



    3. The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company



    4. The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product —>原文的对比取非(直接采购是与最终商品联系,非直接采购是辅助性项目采观)


    5. The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations —>太过引申原文内容(过犹不及)你凭什么说直接采购就是重要的或是不重要的,原文并没有给出相关信息来判断
    (D)



    ring mm 分析的很清楚! 多謝了!


    作者: laihong    时间: 2005-10-25 21:47

    说实在的,我其实也选了D,但我觉得是推理出来的,而不是直接找的.ETS不是说ACCORDING TO 的题应该直接找吧.但这太不对路了吧.


    作者: junguo21c    时间: 2005-11-11 10:26

    同意选D,实在搞不懂 E中所云


    作者: zhougoo    时间: 2005-12-9 09:06
    I agree with D!
    作者: lurker    时间: 2005-12-10 23:51

    37应该是D,根据ETS思路,文中有两处互相呼应的地方(一个是related,一个是not related),正是很可能出对比题的地方。所以D正好是这个对比关系的改写。


    作者: wzparete    时间: 2006-2-13 14:48
    35,为什么D不对?采购策略能叫战略?问题还差不多。
    作者: luyanzheng    时间: 2006-3-10 15:17
    37. 支持d。e选项时通过背景知识的引申,不符合出题思路。而且即使从背景知识来看,e也是不合适的。许多主要的也不一定是通过directly方式购买的
    作者: xjlv128    时间: 2006-7-23 09:53
    综上所述:三题答案分别是CBD
    作者: 无比    时间: 2006-7-25 16:49
    我也觉得35应该选B 段落二就是在解释段落一提出的4个SITUATIONS阿~~
    作者: rei    时间: 2006-8-26 01:22

    第一段:

      在采购过程中,针对两种供货商和产品的情况和关系,分别采用相应策略:
    1、typically---directly related to end products (运用competitve scrutiny采购);
    2、not directly related to production (favor “supplier partnerships”---避开competitve scrutiny采购)。 通过两变量的变化组合,可总结归纳出四种具体情况。

    第二段:

      Type 1,2,3 situations --- by bidding or threat (infer: direct,采购策略-运用并受competitve scrutiny约束)。
      Type 4 situations, … partnerships may be unavoidable. (infer: indirect 情况,采购策略-避开competitve scrutiny)。

    呼应平行第一段,漂亮的结构。


    作者: litperi    时间: 2006-9-3 17:39
    以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-23 8:34:00的发言:

    Q35, B is wrong because of "an explanation for the occurrence of a
                        
    situation "

    Q37, I agree with you.

    35选B

    如果按照“correctness的错误要严重于effectiveness的错误”的话

    B不过是犯了effectiveness的错误 或者说根本没有犯错误

    因为一次只能发生一种situation

    但是C里面谈到strategy

    第二段里面只涉及到situation的解释根列举

    没有谈到strategy的问题

    所谓strategy是一种策略 文章讨论的就不是一个策略的问题

    “There are two

    independent variables—availability

    of alternatives and ease of changing

    suppliers—that companies should

     (20)      use to evaluate”

    而且第二段紧跟“This can create four possible   

    situations”出现

    所以明显是situation的列举

    而且indirect跟direct purchase只能说是purchase pattern跟purchase strategy绝对是两码事!

    综上所述 35选B

    situations”出现

    所以明显是situation的列举

    而且indirect跟direct purchase只能说是purchase pattern跟purchase strategy绝对是两码事!

    综上所述 35选B


    作者: luluQ    时间: 2006-10-5 12:48

    GWD1-37

    We can find answer fr the text:

    competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of items that are directly related to end products.

    With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production,

    All mentions relationship to production or end products.

    So my answer: D


    作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-10-24 22:26

    Q35:

    Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?

              

    1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph.

    2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.

    3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph.

    4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph.

    5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.

    I hold for B.  文章说了一种是direct,一种是indirect- supplier partinership(重点分析这个),之后写了2个影响因素。第二段就分析影响因素,何时产生sp.  原文并没有application of a strategy
            

    请指正

    另外,这个怎么翻...which
    can inappropriately shelter suppliers
    from rigorous competitive scrutiny
    that might afford the purchaser
    economic leverage


    作者: Bill06    时间: 2006-11-4 10:57
    以下是引用晴天小狗在2006-10-24 22:26:00的发言:

    Q35:

    Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?

              

    1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph.

    2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.

    3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph.

    4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph.

    5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.

    I hold for B.  文章说了一种是direct,一种是indirect- supplier partinership(重点分析这个),之后写了2个影响因素。第二段就分析影响因素,何时产生sp.  原文并没有application of a strategy
      

    请指正

    另外,这个怎么翻...which
    can inappropriately shelter suppliers
    from rigorous competitive scrutiny
    that might afford the purchaser
    economic leverage

    (合作伙伴供应商策略)会不恰当地袒护供应商免受激烈竞争性审查,而这种审查可以给购买者提供一定的经济调节优惠(杠杆调节,言下之意,如果有审查在价格上会对购买者有好处,也正是36题选B的原因)


    作者: williamjin    时间: 2007-4-20 22:18

    Q35我坚持B,yinwei:

    1)strategy为为取得一个结果而计划的一串动作。Situation为同时发生的事件2)第1段说scrutiny及partnership两件事,没说目的。


    作者: Drakedirect    时间: 2007-7-30 10:41
    35 C
    37 D
    Totally agree

    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-5 20:12
    以下是引用cdg2004在2005-6-7 11:46:00的发言:

    对于间接采购,公司经常采用战略伙伴关系(即在这种关系中,采购人员不需要寻找可替换的供应商),这样就不恰当地使供应商逃避了的严格的竞争筛选,而这种筛选是能够为采购人员提供价格谈判优势的。

    无比感谢啊!主要就是这句不懂。

    不过,我觉得是不是这样说更好?

    对于间接采购,公司经常采用战略伙伴关系(即在这种关系中,采购人员不可以寻找可替换的供应商),这样就不恰当地使供应商逃避了的严格的竞争筛选,而这种筛选是能够为采购人员提供价格谈判优势的。

    :)

    各位以为如何?


    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-5 20:14
    以下是引用xxiaoyan在2005-8-25 16:20:00的发言:
    似乎这篇文章的答案都在第一段,赫赫

    就是……

    只可惜,我一点儿都看不懂。明知道好像第二段基本和问题无关,但就是找不到相应的信息……


    作者: tangzimo    时间: 2007-10-5 20:18

    我认为35应该就是C嘛

    There are two

    independent variables—availability

    of alternatives and ease of changing

    suppliers—that companies should

     (20)     use to evaluate the feasibility of

           subjecting suppliers of indirect

           purchases to competitive scrutiny.

    我觉得,都说了use 什么东西去evaluate了,这就是一个strategy


    作者: jczephyr    时间: 2008-1-8 01:22

    今晚刚做了GWD第一套,

    这篇文章出在35-37题的位置上,确实杀伤力很大,尤以Q37为甚。

    感觉D和E都很有道理。

    如果按照OG的路子,according to题目,应该是原文提到的,那么答案应该是D,

    如果题目问suggest或者infer,答案E就很好,而且排除了D中可能对relationship的多余想象。

    另外,这篇文章第一段太重要了,第二段虽然是清楚地列出四种情况,但是远比第一段中的抽象叙述更难记忆。


    作者: 阳光雨    时间: 2008-3-14 20:47

    36

    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

    B.They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

    怎么会是more呢??明明supplier partnerships是帮purchaser省钱了啊。。。。越看越糊涂了,谁能解释一下呢??

    which

    can inappropriately shelter suppliers

    from rigorous competitive scrutiny

     (15)      that might afford the purchaser

    economic leverage


    作者: 阳光雨    时间: 2008-3-14 20:47

    36

    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?

    B.They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.

    怎么会是more呢??明明supplier partnerships是帮purchaser省钱了啊。。。。越看越糊涂了,谁能解释一下呢??

    which

    can inappropriately shelter suppliers

    from rigorous competitive scrutiny

     (15)      that might afford the purchaser

    economic leverage


    作者: rorarora    时间: 2008-5-11 23:23

    I agree with D.

    busness operation 和 end product 的意义还是差很多的。


    作者: x_vampire    时间: 2008-6-14 20:16

    一点愚见:37D中提到:to the purchasing company's end product.

    这里好像有混淆概念的目的:end product 应该是 suppliers' 与 purchasing company's没有什么关系吧。

    欢迎继续讨论。

    PS:一开始也选了D,后来看了答案,和TEAM PARTNER一起讨论出来的


    作者: xiaoda    时间: 2008-6-20 13:12
    UP
    作者: tyyzyuanmu    时间: 2009-4-26 14:11
    以下是引用ring_cheng在2005-5-17 18:22:00的发言:

    这是我对各题的理解,欢迎讨论:

    GWD-1-Q35:

    Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?              

    1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph. —>1P没有assertion,只是说明现实情况以及提出两种变量
    2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.
                      —>describe两种变量组合可以形成的不同采购策略,并非explanation

    3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph. —>a strategy 是泛指采购策略,并非特指competitive scrutiny 或是partnership application是指不同组合采用(应用)不同的采购策略

    4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph. —>第一段说partnership采购有问题,但2P没有论述其范围

    5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.
                      —>1P举出两种采购方式,并没有说这两种方式有矛盾

    (C)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    GWD-1-Q36:

    Which of the following can be inferred about supplier partnerships, as they are described in the passage?
                
                  

    1. They cannot be sustained unless the goods or services provided are available from a large number of suppliers. —>没有充分必要性

    2. They can result in purchasers paying more for goods and services than they would in a competitive-bidding situation.
                          —>L12-16
      紧贴原文意思

    3. They typically are instituted at the urging of the supplier rather than the purchaser. —>文章中没说

    4. They are not feasible when the goods or services provided are directly related to the purchasers’ end products. —>没有when的充分必要性

    5. They are least appropriate when the purchasers’ ability to change suppliers is limited. —>最高级不妥

    (B)

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    GWD-1-Q37:

    According to the passage, which of the following factors distinguishes an indirect purchase from other purchases?

    1. The ability of the purchasing company to subject potential suppliers of the purchased item to competitive scrutiny —>与能力无关

    2. The number of suppliers of the purchased item available to the purchasing company

    3. The methods of negotiation that are available to the purchasing company

    4. The relationship of the purchased item to the purchasing company’s end product
                      —>原文的对比取非(直接采购是与最终商品联系,非直接采购是辅助性项目采观)

    5. The degree of importance of the purchased item in the purchasing company’s business operations —>太过引申原文内容(过犹不及)你凭什么说直接采购就是重要的或是不重要的,原文并没有给出相关信息来判断
    (D)


    怒赞~~~~~~~






    欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3