标题: 求助OG 逻辑104题 [打印本页] 作者: eyes123 时间: 2011-6-8 13:36 标题: 求助OG 逻辑104题 104. Although the discount stores in Goreville’s central shopping district are expected to close within fi ve years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long. In the fi ve years since the opening of Colson’s, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson’s. Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument? (A) Many customers of Colson’s are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened. (B) Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson’s opened have been discount stores. (C) At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had. (D) Over the course of the next fi ve years, it is expected that Goreville’s population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades. (E) Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson’s.作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-6-8 19:24
Search for related posts in this forum.作者: connie飘着 时间: 2011-6-9 07:18
同问，同问。 虽然我自己想了一下，但是依然不是很清楚逻辑关系。。。那个高手指点一下啊。作者: eyes123 时间: 2011-6-9 11:29
顶。OG上的解释我看不大清楚。作者: mudiduange 时间: 2011-6-9 11:53
类比论证的方式哈，我觉得这样的题很典型，一般就是用两个场景类比，然后说因为有XX相似，于是得出一个结论。这种题也最容易出，驳斥啊，假设啊，支持啊，都很好出，但思路比较一致。
