ChaseDream

标题: [求助]关于修饰的问题 [打印本页]

作者: arundhati 时间: 2004-6-22 18:21
标题: [求助]关于修饰的问题

这两天总结大全关于修饰问题突然有了些疑问，帖出来大家指正啊。

Added to the increase in hourly wages requested last July, the railroad employees are now seeking an expanded program of retirement benefits.

(A) Added to the increase in hourly wages requested last July, the railroad employees are now seeking an expanded program of retirement benefits.

(B) Added to the increase in hourly wages which had been requested last July, the employees of the railroad are now seeking an expanded program of retirement benefits.

(C) The railroad employees are now seeking an expanded program of retirement benefits added to the increase in hourly wages that were requested last July.

(D) In addition to the increase in hourly wages that were requested last July, the railroad employees are now seeking an expanded program of retirement benefits.（E）

(E) In addition to the increase in hourly wages requested last July, the employees of the railroad are now seeking an expanded program of retirement benefits.

The department defines a private passenger vehicle as one registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds.

(A) as one registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds

(B) to be one that is registered to an individual with a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds

(D) to have a gross weight less than 8,000 pounds and being registered to an individual（C）

(E) as having a gross weight of less than 8,000 pounds and registered to an individual

这两道题涉及道 that从句，v-ed，和介词修饰。在第一题中，that只能修饰wages所以排除，而requested可以喜事increase所以为答案。第二题中with只能修饰individual逻辑错误所以排除。

从这两题我得出：从句(that, what, which, etc)修饰和介词修饰只能就近，而分词不一定就近。是这样吗？想确认一下。

作者: leo1111 时间: 2004-6-22 19:17

个人意见。that就近修饰，但是应该这样的结构也是对的： the increase in hourly wages that was requested last July.用动词was指定that的修饰对象为increase.

作者: arundhati 时间: 2004-6-23 18:17
谢谢这位gg哦，那我总结那个规律是特殊现象，还是普遍现象呢？因为最近被这个修饰搞得头都晕了，有些分不清了，请指点啊～

作者: vincent0330 时间: 2004-6-23 22:57

修饰语结构是我最不肯定的语法点之一.........

尤其是就近修饰与否........常常会干扰做题......

大部份来说, 修饰语是就近的, 然而, 存在一些语序的问题, 使得修饰语会跳跃修饰.....

看看我之前问过得题目吧!!

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=53201

作者: arundhati 时间: 2004-6-24 12:38
谢谢狗狗啊，那就是说修饰都是就近修饰啦？所谓的跳跃也是因为逻辑意思吧？

作者: gmat700+ 时间: 2004-6-25 00:09

以下是引用vincent0330在2004-6-23 22:57:00的发言：

修饰语结构是我最不肯定的语法点之一.........

尤其是就近修饰与否........常常会干扰做题......

大部份来说, 修饰语是就近的, 然而, 存在一些语序的问题, 使得修饰语会跳跃修饰.....

看看我之前问过得题目吧!!

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=23&ID=53201

谢谢你提出这个link，真是好贴！

作者: vincent0330 时间: 2004-6-25 02:07

以下是引用arundhati在2004-6-24 12:38:00的发言：
谢谢狗狗啊，那就是说修饰都是就近修饰啦？所谓的跳跃也是因为逻辑意思吧？

我所连的那帖就有一些是跳跃的....所以我不能说百分百修饰都是就近的(只能说大部份)

我的做法是先用其它的语法点排除掉.....

再决定逻辑意思判断就近修饰与否

作者: arundhati 时间: 2004-6-25 10:51

谢谢狗狗的帖子，确实好帖，集非限定性修饰之精华，不过那一堆一堆得真看得我晕，一会儿这样，一会儿又那样了，真不知道想建立起一个规律到底实不实际，还是根本没规律可寻，仅仅靠老美那些“语感”。ETS还没回你信啊？我也等着结果。

看到你们的讨论实在让我汗颜，那些题我平时用其它语法点排除后，都不再想其它原因了，你们看得好深入啊。现在我感觉到根本不能用修饰来做排除选项的优先项了，实在太迷惑，而且考试的时候都是凭第一印象的，这样实在太误导了～

晕啊，总结来总结去，每建立起一个规律都不久就被推翻了。现在我做起SC题都有些神经质了，想很多很多，而且老举棋不定，花好长时间，真是走火入魔了，不知是不是时候打住呢～

作者: vincent0330 时间: 2004-6-25 11:04

ETS还没回你信啊？我也等着结果。

还没.....不过照那帖子的讨论似乎还没定论

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)