题目太长，就不贴了，只贴这两个选项：
(B) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue; the second acknowledges a circumstance in which that pattern would not hold.
(C) The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue; the second offers a consideration in support of that prediction.
1） 对本题的答案倒没有疑问，只是迷惑ETS为什么把B和C选项中的语法写得很滥，两个选项分号前面部分如果放在SC中部分，肯定是错的，请大家帮忙改一下。
2） 正确答案C中，that prediction 在句中只能指predicts的宾语，即第一部分boldface，而实际上the second 是支持however后面的而不是 the first portion in boldface.
请大家帮忙解释一下，谢谢！
大家帮帮忙啊！
Oh, Thanks, I got your points.
But the portion ahead of the semicolon seems not to be a sentence. It is probable for ETS to omit "and that", the two words that can not be neglected in my mind.
偶妞妞，来啦，试试看：
偶猜你主要是对两个分号前半句不理解，所以只解释前半句：
B. The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue；
that开始的定语从句是修饰前面的a pattern，由于a pattern在从句中作宾语，所以省略引导词that，但是这里的that 是什么呢？其实是引导后半句中的主语从句的引导词，所以整个句子是有三个谓语动词而只有一个从句引导词，实际是省略了一个。
C同样的语法。
C. The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate predicts will not hold in the case at issue；
请NN来确认！谢谢！
谢谢妞妞了，看是不是该这样啊，LES，
The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues and that will be repeated in the case at issue；
两个定语从句并列都modify 那个 a pattern，而ETS 省略了and that。是不是这样啊？但and that怎么可以省呢，郁闷ing.
ETS 
偶不是这样理解的。原来的一句话可以分成两句理解：
The first is a pattern of cause and effect that the consumer advocate argues .
That the consumer advocate argues will be repeated in the case at issue.
宾语从句里套主语从句。
哎呀，LES理解得好神奇，佩服啊。你是怎么想到的，如果AWA敢不敢这样写？
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |