ChaseDream

标题: OG 192 [打印本页]

作者: xu1jf 时间: 2004-6-18 15:52
标题: OG 192

192. Cajuns speak a dialect brought to southern Louisiana by the four thousand Acadians who migrated there in 1755; their language is basically seventeenth-century French to which has been added English. Spanish. and Italian words.
(A) to which has been added English, Spanish, and Italian words
(B) added to which is English, Spanish, and Italian words
(C) to which English, Spanish, and Italian words have been added
(D) with English, Spanish, and Italian words having been added to it
(E) and, in addition, English, Spanish, and Italian words are added
答案C.没问题.

但OG对D的解释我不太懂. 什么是副词结构,它有什么特点,它为什么不能修饰名词?我感觉D也可以修饰前面的名词.请高手解释.

作者: tianwan 时间: 2004-6-18 19:44

看来就像which不能指代句子一样，ETS这样认为。有些语法书上这种“with+独立主格”结构是可以做定语的。但我们参加的是ETS的考试。

作者: bon 时间: 2004-6-18 20:09
看来要纠正对with的看法了

作者: rt316 时间: 2004-6-25 07:46

以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-18 19:44:00的发言：

看来就像which不能指代句子一样，ETS这样认为。有些语法书上这种“with+独立主格”结构是可以做定语的。但我们参加的是ETS的考试。

引导独立主格的with都是在逗号后以with开头的，这句with前没有逗号。... their language is basically seventeenth-century French with English, Spanish and Italian words having been added to it 句中的with简直就相当于一个连词，当然不能修饰French。

作者: zenger 时间: 2005-9-7 13:47

以下是引用rt316在2004-6-25 7:46:00的发言：

引导独立主格的with都是在逗号后以with开头的，这句with前没有逗号。... their language is basically seventeenth-century French with English, Spanish and Italian words having been added to it 句中的with简直就相当于一个连词，当然不能修饰French。

同意。

而且从意思上来说，这里显然不应该用独立主格。

在说，既然是修饰意思和限定作用，就应该用从句而不是独立主格，这在ＯＧ中应该有好多例子。

作者: lyyforever 时间: 2005-11-18 16:57

那为啥不能是修饰language呢？这不是也说得通？不过句尾的it好像有问题。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)