ChaseDream

标题: 有个关于MANHATT的解释,不明白,求助 [打印本页]

作者: crack25    时间: 2011-6-3 10:17
标题: 有个关于MANHATT的解释,不明白,求助
Today’s technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history.

A.small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their

B.small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their

C.small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in

D.more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their(C)

E.more fuel-efficient small cars now than at any time in

在看完manhattan后,再看这个题目有个大问题
因为m上说That or those indicating a New Copy or copies must be modified. In other words, you have
to add a description to indicate how the new copy is different from the previous version.
那所以正确答案C的情况就有些奇怪,those后面是at any other time这个明显是个介词短语怎么可能修饰名词/代词those所以我认为those没有东西修饰,感觉非常奇怪
谁能帮我解释一下

作者: jameshzd    时间: 2011-6-3 10:49
those 在这里不需要被修饰,在代词前面的句子没有任何hint 去指明代词的时候,代词就往往需要修饰或限制来确定它的身份,但是此题those 和 前面的small cars 在作对比,那么those 就是指的车啊~
呵呵,希望我讲的对楼主有启发哈~
作者: crack25    时间: 2011-6-3 13:55
标题:
哦哦,是不是可以这么理解,因为前面就是smaller cars,没有其他的复数NOUN,所以those不需要有东西来修饰。
恩,但是,这个真的可以按照我来理解吗?我只能够有一些不放心,谁在核实一下!求
作者: jameshzd    时间: 2011-6-3 17:50
不是按照你自己的感觉理解,是两个事物进行比较的时候,这两个对象一定是同一类型的啊,否则就没可比性了啊~
作者: crack25    时间: 2011-6-3 20:54
那就是说如果前面有两个复数词的话,这里就要小心those应该有修饰了,right?
作者: 若雪    时间: 2011-6-4 02:25
Today’s technology allows manufacturers to make small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their production history.

A.small cars more fuel-efficient now than at any time in their

B.small cars that are more fuel-efficient than they were at any time in their

C.small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in

D.more fuel-efficient small cars than those at any other time in their(C)

E.more fuel-efficient small cars now than at any time in

在看完manhattan后,再看这个题目有个大问题
因为m上说That or those indicating a New Copy or copies must be modified. In other words, you have
to add a description to indicate how the new copy is different from the previous version.
那所以正确答案C的情况就有些奇怪,those后面是at any other time这个明显是个介词短语怎么可能修饰名词/代词those所以我认为those没有东西修饰,感觉非常奇怪
谁能帮我解释一下
-- by 会员 crack25 (2011/6/3 10:17:06)






就像M里面举得例子一样:the money spent by her parents is less than that spent by her children.


those/that用作指代的关键点就是用those指代的那个必定和前面有某种不同,如果是一样的话那就用personal pronouns了。所以只要修饰部分点出不同即可。


这道题里面 Today’s technology allows manufacturers to make small cars that are more fuel-efficient than those at any other time in production history.


我觉得这边at any other time in production history是做时间状语修饰those。比较的对象是今天的small cars 和 any other time in production history的small cars。


所以不同点在于时间。所以可以用those。


这是我的观点哈~如果有不对的地方请指教~


PS:我最近也在看manhattan哈~另外你还有篇帖子说的关于there be句型的问题,我觉得应该是ARE 如果后面是复数的话。



作者: jameshzd    时间: 2011-6-4 11:01
那就是说如果前面有两个复数词的话,这里就要小心those应该有修饰了,right?
-- by 会员 crack25 (2011/6/3 20:54:06)


可以这样理解了,但是提醒楼主哦,ETS有时候会设陷阱的,两个对比的对象虽然是同一类的,但是前者是单数,后者是复数,那么此时用those 指代后者就是错的,因为前者是单数导致those没有指代。
作者: jiaying52    时间: 2011-6-4 11:45
个人认为,比较题中如果是一样的词,在没有歧义的情况下,可以省略。those后面的的small cars被省略了
作者: crack25    时间: 2011-6-5 17:06
恩恩,好久没看了,感谢各位,若雪,Jam~,还有下面的同学写的,恩,明白了,我再去找找我问的there be
作者: crack25    时间: 2011-6-5 17:12
恩,你想说there be就近还是不就近呢?



附:我很早就写了m的帖子,结果看4天没人理,就放弃了,没想到有这么多人理,好幸福,就是那个there be
作者: jun383914    时间: 2011-6-5 19:06
写的非常清楚!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3