ChaseDream

标题: prep1 87 [打印本页]

作者: rainbowmanutd 时间: 2011-6-2 07:00
标题: prep1 87
Results of aUnited States study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine haveshown college-educated women and women living in the South and West to besignificantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women livingin the Northeast and Midwest.

(A)college-educated women and women living in the South and West to besignificantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living
(B)college-educated women and women living in the South and West as significantlymore likely to use supplemental hormones than if they are living
(C)college-educated women and those living in the South and West beingsignificantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they lived
(D) thatcollege-educated women and women who live in the South and West aresignificantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as were women thatlived
(E) thatcollege-educated women and women living in the South and West are significantlymore likely to use supplemental hormones than women living

答案是E,可是E的比较没有在最后补出助动词阿，造成了歧义阿

I eat more rice than Tom does就需要补出助动词，如果这个题不补的话，有女人用女人比用荷尔蒙多的歧义呀

作者: humsung 时间: 2011-6-2 09:15
当不会产生歧义的时候, 动词可以省略的.

作者: rainbowmanutd 时间: 2011-6-2 11:15

当不会产生歧义的时候, 动词可以省略的.

-- by 会员 humsung (2011/6/2 9:15:26)

这个题省略了，会有歧义阿

作者: 坤kun 时间: 2011-6-2 13:29
我觉得有没有歧义主要是看理解出来的意思通不通~也就是说要make sense~这个如果按照LZ的理解就是女人用荷尔蒙比用女人多，可是LZ要怎么看待这句话想表达的含义呢？这种完全不会理解错误的情况下就可以省略动词了~
其实GMAT很多问题都不能抠的太死，很多NN都说过SC的答案是比出来的，尽管正确答案也未必是最优的那一个~

作者: Rainbeauty 时间: 2011-6-2 14:00
提示: 作者被禁止或删除内容自动屏蔽

作者: rainbowmanutd 时间: 2011-6-3 01:46

我觉得有没有歧义主要是看理解出来的意思通不通~也就是说要make sense~这个如果按照LZ的理解就是女人用荷尔蒙比用女人多，可是LZ要怎么看待这句话想表达的含义呢？这种完全不会理解错误的情况下就可以省略动词了~
其实GMAT很多问题都不能抠的太死，很多NN都说过SC的答案是比出来的，尽管正确答案也未必是最优的那一个~

-- by 会员坤kun (2011/6/2 13:29:07)

可是OG12里有个拔犀牛角的，这样参观者就不会来参观的题目，里面的they就是因为有指代”人的角“而排除了一个选项，如果按逻辑来的话，人怎么可能长角呢。。。？按这个道理，og的解释也是错的了。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)