ChaseDream

标题: 为什么给了答案也看不懂呢？？想不到那个点上？思路没打开？求助~~ [打印本页]

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-6-1 01:16
标题: 为什么给了答案也看不懂呢？？想不到那个点上？思路没打开？求助~~
121. (25242-!-item-!-188;#058&001232) (T-4-Q34,different type)

In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Over the last few years, the number of Kravonians enrolled in college has been growing steadily. Therefore, the number of Kravonians entering the job market who have at least the qualification of a college degree will eventually be significantly higher than it has been over the last few years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Kravonians with more than one college degree earn little more, on average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree.
B. The average number of years Kravonian college students remain enrolled before completing a degree has been increasing over the past several years.
C. Despite the increase in the number of Kravonians attending college, the percentage of the population attending college is lower in Kravonia than in most other countries.
D. In recent years, employers have been requiring college degrees for workers in jobs that were previously performed successfully by Kravonians who did not have college degrees.
E. For many years, employers in Kravonia have had difficulty finding enough college graduates to fill the high-paying jobs that were available.
此题选B 我选的E 我觉得E会对呀~~B怎么能削弱呢？

116. (31915-!-item-!-188;#058&006665) (T-4-Q34)

In Kravonia, the average salary for jobs requiring a college degree has always been higher than the average salary for jobs that do not require a degree. Current enrollments in Kravonia's colleges indicate that over the next four years the percentage of the Kravonian workforce with college degrees will increase dramatically. Therefore, the average salary for all workers in Kravonia is likely to increase over the next four years.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. Kravonians with more than one college degree earn more, on average, than do Kravonians with only one college degree.
B. The percentage of Kravonians who attend college in order to earn higher salaries is higher now than it was several years ago.
C. The higher average salary for jobs requiring a college degree is not due largely to a scarcity among the Kravonian workforce of people with a college degree.
D. The average salary in Kravonia for jobs that do not require a college degree will not increase over the next four years.
E. Few members of the Kravonian workforce earned their degrees in other countries.
答案是C 我选的D ,我觉得D 是排除他因，为什么呢？？

作者: camelo777 时间: 2011-6-1 10:08
121题我的理解是
原题的结论是因为这两年进入大学的学生多了，所以在job market上有大学学位的学生应该比前两年significantly higher
B选项说的是每名学生进入学校后最终毕业的时间越来越长了，比如说本来快的人3年毕业，正常的4年，现在都变成5,6年毕业了，那也就是说不可能有significantly higher 的有大学学位的学生进入这个job market
E选项我觉得是无关的，企业招不到足够的人和大学生进入job market的人数增加没有关系，就算是大学生的数量significantly 增加了，我还是有可能招不够人，所以没有削弱的作用

作者: camelo777 时间: 2011-6-1 10:13
116很明显是C
原文的前提是有学位的平均收入比没学位的高，在未来四年里会有大量的有学位的学生进入job market，因为得到结论平均收入会升高

这个前提自然是以前大学生的收入高不是因为他们稀缺，因为如果大学生稀有，自然收入高，但现在多了，不稀有了，公司就不会付你这么多钱了，所以选C

作者: 狂威雪 时间: 2011-6-1 12:12
谢谢了~~其实是把选项取反看，就一目了然了~~不是供小于求，工资才高的。如果供大于求，工资会低，就削弱了结论~~

作者: lianlianchen 时间: 2011-6-1 22:36
camelo777 解释很到位。

作者: cecilia422 时间: 2013-3-26 10:58
Enrollment是特指新生入学的数量吗？还是指每年开学报到的人数呀？
如果是后者的话，那么很有可能the number of enrollment上升不代表毕业生数量的增加，直接进行断桥了

作者: zy07055 时间: 2013-4-7 16:00
这题模糊的地方就在eventually be significantly higher. 即使延长了毕业时间，但是最终总会higher的啊，所以我觉得这道题出的不好！

作者: 子衿68 时间: 2013-4-7 16:51
第一道：
background：拿到学位的人工资比没拿学位的人工资要高
premise：这两年，学校报到人数在增加
conclusion：进入工作市场的人一定比前几年多
weaken：报到了的人不一定毕业，毕业了的人不一定就工作，所以人才市场人数增加得不到论证。楼主你只要做题的时候理出一个逻辑链来了就简单多了，这里明显有一个gap

第二题：
background：拿了学士学位的人工资较没拿学位的人要高
premise：未来几年人才市场上拥有学士学位的劳动力比率将增加
conclusion：工资将上涨
assumption：毕业了的人，人才市场一定会要。assumption这种题型其实就是找出假设和结论中的gap，然后把它填上就行了

作者: 20120328 时间: 2016-6-18 17:09

zy07055 发表于 2013-4-7 16:00
这题模糊的地方就在eventually be significantly higher. 即使延长了毕业时间，但是最终总会higher的啊，所 ...

同意！

作者: vickizhq 时间: 2016-8-20 21:29
这道题题目不是很懂，马后炮的从答案往前推，最重要的还是怎么理解enrolled in college，根据答案看答案是enrolled在校的时间长了。所以题目中的enrolled应该理解成登记在校的总人数。如果是这样比较说的通，b选项时间延长了，比如这地方每年生2个人，原来四年上完学，平均每年1个人读书1个人当文盲。登记在校4个人；现在要五年才能上完学，平均每年还是一个人读书1个人当文盲，比例没有变化，但是从登记在校人数上看呢卧槽多了25%。。。
除了这么解释，我觉得其他的都很牵强。比如进来不一定毕业毕业不一定工作。那这是一个本来就存在的现象，说这个谈不上削弱或者加强。而且如果不是我上面这么解释，最终！最终一定会出现题目说的结果

作者: 锕儍 时间: 2016-11-15 16:32

vickizhq 发表于 2016-8-20 21:29
这道题题目不是很懂，马后炮的从答案往前推，最重要的还是怎么理解enrolled in college，根据答案看答案是e ...

感觉你说的有道理。
如果enroll的意思是每年上学的人数的话就解释得通了

作者: five_ywc 时间: 2016-11-30 22:41
感谢分享！

作者: 嘎东 时间: 2019-1-6 13:31

camelo777 发表于 2011-6-1 10:08
121题我的理解是原题的结论是因为这两年进入大学的学生多了，所以在job market上有大学学位的学生应该比前 ...

121的B，The average number of years Kravonian college students remain enrolled before completing a degree has been increasing over the past several years.

这句话我的理解是，原先由很多人，只是入读了大学，但比如1，2年，还没毕业就辍学了。而最近，辍学率下降了（在毕业前的平均读书年数增加了）。所以这个选项如果这样理解，反而是有一点点strengthen原文的结论。

不过相比其他选项，确实也只能选B了。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)