142. In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of marketing, the Coca-Cola company in July 1985 yielded to thousands of irate consumers demanding that it should bring back the original Coke formula.
(A) demanding that it should
(B) demanding it to
(C) and their demand to
(D) who demanded that it
(E) who demanded it to
Choice A incorrectly uses should bring rather than bring:
demanding that already conveys the idea of "should," and at any rate a modal（情态）
auxiliary （辅助）verb, such as should or must, cannot grammatically follow the
expression demanded that. Similarly,
B and E use the ungrammatical expression demanding/demanded it to.
In C, the expression yielded to... customers and their demand to bring... unnecessarily states that the company yielded to the customers as well as to their demand.
This expression also fails to specify that the company is expected to bring back the original formula.
我的问题是如果选项A中的should去掉的话，下面三种限定性修饰有什么区别呢？
1. thousands of irate consumers demanding that
2. thousands of irate consumers with the demand that
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that
谢谢大家帮助。
1 and 3, which can be used here, are better than 2, which is wordy.
The difference betten 1 and 3 is that 1 emphasize ongoing action but 3 not.
谢谢stoneren，这就是全部的区别了吗？
谢谢stoneren，这就是全部的区别了吗？
那1和3哪个更好呢?
关于分词与定语从句的区别还有一条见OG237
237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range.
(A) may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other
(B) may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other
(C) are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other
(D) are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the other
(E) are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other
Choice E, the best answer Choice C Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various locations.(现在分词与从句的区别).
但根据此条原则看不出在142中有什么区别,请帮忙看看.谢谢.!!!
其实，如果不是选择而是填空，142那题我还是会填：who demanded that。因为从时态上讲，demand仅仅是发生在过去的事件。
可以参考OG80/142/144/167/258，其中，167的时态比较特殊，可以自己分析一下原因。
同意stoneren。新东方老师说：doing的形式一定要小心，其成为正确答案的比率低。我这个是上课的笔记
1. thousands of irate consumers demanding that 指是强调动作的重复性，行为和方式
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 强调动作的发生，状态和结果
同意stoneren。新东方老师说：doing的形式一定要小心，其成为正确答案的比率低。我这个是上课的笔记
1. thousands of irate consumers demanding that 指是强调动作的重复性，行为和方式
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 强调动作的发生，状态和结果
那么请问以下两句有什么分别? when to use "who" and when not to? I always get confused. 请 NN 指点.
- thousands of irate consumers demanded that
- thousands of irate consumers who demanded that
- thousands of irate consumers demanded that 是consumers 被要求
thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 是consumers 要求
demand sb/sth to do sth
没有这个用法吗？我的印象中好象有这个用法吧？手头没有动词用法的参考资料，麻烦NN帮忙解惑。多谢！！！！！
| 1 | to ask for something very firmly, especially because you think you have a right to do this  Angry demonstrators demanded the resignation of two senior officials. demand to know/see/have etc something I demand to know what's going on. 'Where are you going?' she demanded angrily. |
| 2 | if one thing demands another, it needs that thing in order to happen or be done successfully Too many things demanded his attention at the same time. It's a desperate situation demanding a desperate remedy. |
142. In one of the most stunning reversals in the history of marketing, the Coca-Cola company in July 1985 yielded to thousands of irate consumers demanding that it should bring back the original Coke formula.
(A) demanding that it should
(B) demanding it to
(C) and their demand to
(D) who demanded that it
(E) who demanded it to
1. thousands of irate consumers demanding that
2. thousands of irate consumers with the demand that
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that
谢谢大家帮助。
请问3是非限制性定语从句么,如果是,那么前面为什么不加逗号?类似于第141题
ding 一下
thx
为什么要是非限制性定语从句呢？我觉得是限制性的！
仍然不明白这三种的区别！～
顶～～～
定从和分词在用法上面区分微乎其微, 不推荐大家作为判断正误的标准, ETS没有在任何地方讲解两者的区别, 我认为, 总结出来的一些规律最多作为检验答案的一个标准.
仍然不明白。
请讨论。顶。
I agree with Avantasia on this.
1. thousands of irate consumers demanding that
2. thousands of irate consumers with the demand that
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that
个人意见，1和3的demanding...与who demanded....区别在于demanding表示一种多次重复的动作限定修饰，另在本题中与主句的 in July 1985 yielded的时态冲突。2的with the demand that除了有wordy问题（一位NN的意思），with...的限定修饰我认为属于1和3的折衷，避免了demanding的时态问题，但是也没有3的表达清晰。
首先，词与词之间有优选的关系，新东方总结的规律就是
动词〉形容词〉名词〉分词，动名词〉从句，所以
1.
thousands of irate consumers demanding that
2.
thousands of irate consumers with the demand that
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that
三个选项中2就没有1和3好，因为2的demand为名词。
其次，引用七楼的建议同意stoneren。新东方老师说：doing的形式一定要小心，其成为正确答案的比率低。我这个是上课的笔记
1. thousands of irate consumers demanding that 指是强调动作的重复性，行为和方式
3. thousands of irate consumers who demanded that 强调动作的发生，状态和结果
这样D is the best
这样D is the best
这个题好像会有疑问，D答案限定性从句修饰，会产生这样的意思，除了面对这些要求实施原可乐配方的消费者外, coca-cola还面对有其他的消费者，而这些消费者是没有这样要求的。
我不太清楚你的疑问指的是什么。
我想限定性从句正说明只产生了这样特定的一类消费者，而不是其他消费者。
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |