ChaseDream

标题: 求教og12 cr 94题 [打印本页]
作者: hhhlll    时间: 2011-5-31 01:26
标题: 求教og12 cr 94题
94. Studies in restaurants show thatthe tips left by customers who pay their bill in cash tend to be larger whenthe bill is presented on a tray that bears a credit card logo. Consumerpsychologists hypothesize that simply seeing a credit-card logo makes many credit card holderswilling to spend more because it reminds them that their spending power exceedsthe cash they have immediately available.
Which of the following, if true, moststrongly supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?
(A) The effect noted in the studies isnot limited topatrons who have credit cards.
(B) Patrons who are under financial pressure from their credit-card obligationstend to tip less when presented with a restaurant bill on a tray with a credit-cardlogo than when the tray has no logo.
(C) In virtually all of the cases inthe studies, the patrons who paid bills in cash did not possess credit cards.
(D) In general, restaurant patrons who pay their bills in cash leave largertips than do those who pay by credit card.
(E) The percentage of restaurant billspaid with a given brand of credit card increases when that credit card’s logo is displayed on the tray with which the bill is presented.
正确答案是B，懂了。。。但是我选的D，觉得D也还行啊。。。
D为啥不对啊。。。求教！
作者: sdcar2010    时间: 2011-5-31 01:40
It has nothing to do with seeing a credit-card logo.  Therefore, it is a weakener.
作者: alexlixin    时间: 2011-5-31 05:09
同意楼上。
但是此题也可以这样理解，题目中推论的核心基础是“REMINDS THEM THAT THEIR SPENDING POWER EXCEEDS......"，也就是说是否能让顾客想到自己的"SPENDING POWER"的大小是决定顾客所给小费多少的依据，题目中的实例表明看到LOGO提醒了顾客他们还有现金之外的基于信用卡的更大的“EXPENDING POWER",所以给小费很大方；B项正好从相反的角度呼应了这个判断，即对有还钱压力的人来说，看到LOGO就想到有债务，使他们想到自己的“SPENDING POWER"很小，所以给小费少。D项与是否能提醒到顾客的”EXPENDING POWER"无关，不能辅助增强题目想要说明的观点，因为如果一般来说用现金支付的人就比用信用卡支付的人付小费多，既然是一般性的常规现象，就使原题的”STUDY“以及由此产生的对”LOGO"有无和小费多少之间关系的假设推断失去意义。
作者: termaze    时间: 2011-5-31 07:45
楼上正解！
作者: hhhlll    时间: 2011-5-31 15:32
解释里面对D的解释是：To the extent that this bears on the interpretation of the study,it weakens it.Patrons using credit cards are surely aware that they have credit,and yet they spend less generously.

求这句话的翻译。。。不懂
作者: hhhlll    时间: 2011-5-31 15:35
Patrons using credit cards are surely aware that they have credit,and yet they spend less generously.

是说patrons看到信用卡标记变得less(更少的)慷慨了？？？
作者: irisyangxw    时间: 2011-7-6 17:07
haha,我也是这题不明白~~看了后受用万分，感激！
作者: kate198501    时间: 2011-7-6 17:21
解释里面对D的解释是：To the extent that this bears on the interpretation of the study,it weakens it. Patrons using credit cards are surely aware that they have credit,and yet they spend less generously.

求这句话的翻译。。。不懂
-- by 会员 hhhlll (2011/5/31 15:32:45)



这句话的意思是，就调研的解释相关性，它有削弱作用。使用信用卡的客人当然注意到他们可以刷卡赊欠，但这（想到信用卡佘账）反而使他们更不慷慨。
作者: wtylys    时间: 2011-7-12 10:20
楼上正解
作者: q1weruqt    时间: 2011-7-31 09:20
alex庖丁解牛
作者: 鹤源    时间: 2011-8-1 20:57
还是觉得理解不够透彻，求庖丁解牛！
作者: 鹤源    时间: 2011-8-2 00:34
解释里面对D的解释是：To the extent that this bears on the interpretation of the study,it weakens it.Patrons using credit cards are surely aware that they have credit,and yet they spend less generously.

求这句话的翻译。。。不懂
-- by 会员 hhhlll (2011/5/31 15:32:45)



选项是说：用现金的人比用信用卡的人付小费多。

OG的解释其实是更深了一个层次：
其实这个选项对于题目问的“Which of the following, if true, moststrongly supports the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies?”是没有关系的，因为选项与psychologists’ interpretation根本不搭边、更为提及一点关于credi logo ；
但是OG更深的解释了一下，即就这种程度而言（To the extent，这句很重要），基于D选项（this）对这份研究的理解（bears on the interpretation of the study，注意此处针对的是文章前三行study的理解，而不是针对the psychologists’ interpretation of the studies），D选项削弱了题目中的研究。因为用信用卡的顾客当然知道他们有信用额度，然而却仍然并不慷慨（Patrons using credit cards are surely aware that they have credit,and yet they spend less generously.
）。意思就是说，用信用卡付款的人无需logo的提醒就知道自己有信用额度（spending power）但是却还是比现金付款的人给的小费少，和结论spending power大、小费多这个相反，所以是削弱。

我也是“抠”了半天才折腾出这么个解释，希望大家能明白，还因这个跟男朋友吵了一架，他解释半天我听不懂。后来妥协了，呵呵~~~
作者: ndslyy    时间: 2011-9-23 22:06
弱弱的问一句：文章解释中的situation：studies have found that restaurant customers give more generous tips when their bills are brought on trays bearing a credit-card logo这句话不是和原文意思反了？？？   我是菜鸟。。。。
作者: xiaomiyue    时间: 2011-12-26 16:25
太谢谢前辈们了，解释的真明白！！
作者: abjure    时间: 2012-9-18 09:48
解释里面对D的解释是：To the extent that this bears on the interpretation of the study,it weakens it. Patrons using credit cards are surely aware that they have credit,and yet they spend less generously.

求这句话的翻译。。。不懂
-- by 会员 hhhlll (2011/5/31 15:32:45)




这句话的意思是，就调研的解释相关性，它有削弱作用。使用信用卡的客人当然注意到他们可以刷卡赊欠，但这（想到信用卡佘账）反而使他们更不慷慨。
-- by 会员 kate198501 (2011/7/6 17:21:09)


这里Credit 指的不是指的“信用卡佘账”即欠多少钱， 指的是“信用额度”。 addtional spending power。
D选项： 您有信用额度但不慷慨大方，削弱了文章的结论“看到信用logo就更加慷慨大方”。
作者: bradyiris    时间: 2013-10-6 06:31
3楼正解。谢谢你的答案，让我受益匪浅



欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3