标题: og12 133 E選項錯誤在哪? [打印本页] 作者: Kath1985 时间: 2011-5-26 21:26 标题: og12 133 E選項錯誤在哪? Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.
A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting C. that requireturtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect D. to requireturtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting E. to requireturtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
Ans: B 查過帖子 還是不明白og解釋說的 to require不好的原因 以下是B和E比較 翻成中文 同樣都是 法律要求... B with laws (which require )requiring .... E with laws to require... 請問E到底錯在哪呢?作者: Kath1985 时间: 2011-6-4 16:31
請問E錯在哪呢作者: Kath1985 时间: 2011-6-4 18:04 作者: jameshzd 时间: 2011-6-4 18:39
to require 和 requiring 语法上讲都不错，但是用法会导致句子的意思有细微的差别。law requiring..... 是指这个法律的内容是要求 turtle-excluder devices 放入 shrimp nets ，而 law to require 是指这个法律的目的是 turtle-excluder devices 放入 shrimp nets ，可这个与题目原意不符，law 制定的目的是去 protect adult sea turtles。 所以用requiring 表示法律的实质内容更精准些。不知道楼主这样理解了没？
