ChaseDream

标题: 求解!prep2007816——no.44 谢谢!! [打印本页]

作者: fanfanvivi    时间: 2011-5-22 13:43
标题: 求解!prep2007816——no.44 谢谢!!
Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have succeeded for the first time in mining heat
from the Earth's interior and producing energy on a commercial scale, enough for efficient
generation of electricity and heating factories and homes.

(A) and producing energy on a commercial scale, enough for efficient generation of electricity and
heating
(B) and producing enough energy on a commercial scale for electricity to be generated efficiently
and to heat
(C) for energy production on a commercial scale, enough for generating electricity efficiently and to
heat
(D) to produce energy on a commercial scale, enough for generating electricity efficiently and for
heating
(E) to produce enough energy on a commercial scale for efficient generation of electricity and heat

问:为什么讲A的前半部分中的have succeeded…and producing…进行比较?可不可以理解将in mining和producing进行比较?可以理解为成功的减少热量和产生足够的能量?
作者: fanfanvivi    时间: 2011-5-22 14:08
大牛们!!快来帮我解一下!!顶!
作者: kingarthur00    时间: 2011-5-30 12:39
Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have succeeded for the first time in mining heat
from the Earth's interior and producing energy on a commercial scale, enough for efficient
generation of electricity and heating factories and homes.

(A) and producing energy on a commercial scale, enough for efficient generation of electricity and
heating
(B) and producing enough energy on a commercial scale for electricity to be generated efficiently
and to heat
(C) for energy production on a commercial scale, enough for generating electricity efficiently and to
heat
(D) to produce energy on a commercial scale, enough for generating electricity efficiently and for
heating
(E) to produce enough energy on a commercial scale for efficient generation of electricity and heat

问:为什么讲A的前半部分中的have succeeded…and producing…进行比较?可不可以理解将in mining和producing进行比较?可以理解为成功的减少热量和产生足够的能量?
-- by 会员 fanfanvivi (2011/5/22 13:43:59)


mining 应该是开采吧,不是减少的意思
作者: 云游    时间: 2013-1-6 18:01
Dear, 我觉得这题的关键不是Parallelism, 而是Modification.
如果说Scientists succeeded in both "mining heat..." and "producing energy...", what should  "enough for...." modify?
是Mining heat enough for...还是producing energy enough for呢?

这是一个问题,如果从句子的concise and effective expression 表达的角度考虑,是不是“开发太阳能来生产更充足的能量”比“开发太阳能并开发更多能量”更加的简洁有效呢?是不是也很好的表达出来这样一种目的的含义呢?用and表示并列的结构读上去就没有太多意义,放在中文的表达中听上去也像是一堆废话...
个人见解,希望各位多多指教。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3