标题: 再问 T-4-Q17 ` [打印本页] 作者: 莫里亚提 时间: 2011-5-18 22:29 标题: 再问 T-4-Q17 ` ?T-4-Q17 ?Galileo did not invent the telescope, but on hearing, in 1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, he quickly built his own device from an organ pipe and spectacle lenses.
A.Galileo did not invent the telescope, but on hearing, in 1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, he B.Galileo had not invented the telescope, but when he heard, in 1609, of such an optical instrument having been made, C.Galileo, even though he had not invented the telescope, on hearing, in1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, he D.Even though Galileo did not invent the telescope, on hearing, in 1609, that such an optical instrument had been made, E.Even though Galileo did not invent the telescope, but when he heard, 1609, of such an optical instrument being made, he
B错在哪里？作者: 莫里亚提 时间: 2011-5-19 22:46
木有人理我啊……作者: salle66 时间: 2011-5-20 09:35
B项错误很明显哦, have been done是不能拿来做修饰的，楼主以后只要看到哪个名词是用having been done来修饰的，这个选项就一定是错的。而且本句heard of sth.后面还有修饰sth.的部分，使得整个结构很奇怪，为了表达的更清楚，多用that来引导句子，即heard that......然后将修饰sth.的部分转换成动词来修饰sth.
这样说明白么？作者: 莫里亚提 时间: 2011-5-20 11:04
B项错误很明显哦, have been done是不能拿来做修饰的，楼主以后只要看到哪个名词是用having been done来修饰的，这个选项就一定是错的。而且本句heard of sth.后面还有修饰sth.的部分，使得整个结构很奇怪，为了表达的更清楚，多用that来引导句子，即heard that......然后将修饰sth.的部分转换成动词来修饰sth.
这样说明白么？
-- by 会员 salle66 (2011/5/20 9:35:14)
很明白，谢谢~作者: jessegxy 时间: 2011-12-6 20:05
这里显然不是having been done带来的错误，这个having是因为前面的heard of,而且谁说having been done不能作修饰呢，那是白勇的老观点了吧。B的后半句是个明显的fragment啊作者: HarrisZheng 时间: 2011-12-6 20:40
LS才是到位的解释 B选项只有个从句 ，主句没有主语 此外 全句句首的过去完成时也不对
