ChaseDream

标题: FeiFei-38 [打印本页]

作者: kevin_ws    时间: 2004-6-9 21:38
标题: FeiFei-38


Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.



Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:



(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.



(B) Amphibian populations are declining far more rapidly than are the populations of nonamphibian species whose tissues and eggs have more natural protection from UV-B.



(C) Atmospheric ozone has been significantly depleted above all the areas of the world in which amphibian populations are declining.



(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.



(E) Amphibian populations have declined continuously for the last 50 years


why choice (a)?



作者: fair_sword    时间: 2004-6-10 01:03
A是无关选项,
作者: dashasha    时间: 2004-6-10 03:52
why not choose A?楼主先谈谈你的想法啊。
作者: kevin_ws    时间: 2004-6-10 08:00
A怎么是无关选项啊,选D呢
作者: dashasha    时间: 2004-6-10 09:09
D是有关的,D排除了另一种可能的造成Amphibian populations减少的原因。
作者: kevin_ws    时间: 2004-6-10 10:43
但我还是不理解A怎么是无关选项
作者: dashasha    时间: 2004-6-10 12:18
那你说说A哪里有关了?
作者: tulipmontreal    时间: 2004-6-10 13:16
楼上的 请注意damage genes, 题目里面没有这个对Amphibian populations 减少的影响
作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-6-10 15:19

    选A

    line of reasoning: 紫外线多——》A数量下降

    问非支持

    A说UVB是唯一损伤基因的可被臭氧层破坏的射线

    显然无关,不管UVB是否具有A所说的属性,都不影响原文的line of reasoning

    D是排除他因型加强


作者: hougang    时间: 2004-12-27 19:53
以下是引用tulipmontreal在2004-6-10 13:16:00的发言:
楼上的 请注意damage genes, 题目里面没有这个对Amphibian populations 减少的影响


Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.


原文中有提到。


我选了d。


D选项说The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.


你们认为是加强。但是原文中根本就没有出现栖息地的大小和population的直接关系.


So it appears to be irrelevant in my mind.


还是认为D是无关选项。。。请指正



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-12-27 23:14:27编辑过]

作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2004-12-27 22:20
标题: FeiFei-38
我选D。A并非无关,而是对结论有加强作用:由于UVB会损伤基因,造成了amphians 数量的减少。
作者: lawyer_1    时间: 2004-12-27 23:51

D排除一种他因,假如Amphibian住的地方越来越少的话,其数量也就越来越少。

A的UV-B是不是唯一一种对基因有伤害的对结论没影响,结论是臭氧的减少导致了Amphibian的减少。


作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2004-12-28 11:50

Amphibian populations are declining in numbers worldwide. Not coincidentally, the earth’s ozone layer has been continuously depleted throughout the last 50 years. Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, a type of ultraviolet radiation that is continuously produced by the sun, and which can damage genes. Because amphibians lack hair, hide, or feathers to shield them, they are particularly vulnerable to UV-B radiation. In addition, their gelatinous eggs lack the protection of leathery or hard shells. Thus, the primary cause of the declining amphibian population is the depletion of the ozone layer.


Each of the following, if true, would strengthen the argument EXCEPT:

(A) Of the various types of radiation blocked by atmospheric ozone, UV-B is the only type that can damage genes.

(D) The natural habitat of amphibians has not become smaller over the past century.

because Atmospheric ozone blocks UV-B, if atmospheric has been depleted, UV-B will harm genes. so I think that A support the conclusion,but is not unrelated with the conclusion.


作者: snowjing    时间: 2005-10-9 05:29

把老贴翻出来, 费费宝典详解中的答案错了. 正确答案应为A.


文章并没有说一定是damage gene才导致decling population. 只不过在描述UVB是, 一笔带过它有这个性质. 关键在于amphibians身上没有protection "they are particularly vulnerable to UVB radiation".


建议斑斑改详解中的答案, 要不confused.






欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3