ChaseDream

标题: (OG70)问个傻傻的阅读问题, 大家别笑我啊!! [打印本页]

作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-6-8 22:50
标题: (OG70)问个傻傻的阅读问题, 大家别笑我啊!!

是OG-SC里面的解释, 可我没能全懂.....


70.   A President entering the final two years of a second term is likely to be at a severe disadvantage and often unable to carry out a legislative program.



(A) likely to be at a severe disadvantage and is often unable to




(B) likely severely disadvantaged and often unable to




(C) liable to be severely disadvantaged and cannot often




(D) liable that he or she is at a severe disadvantage and cannot oftenA




(E) at a severe disadvantage, often likely to be unable that he or she can




Choice A is best. Choice B lacks the necessary infinitive after likely. In B and C, disadvantaged, which often means “hampered by substandard economic and social conditions,” is less precise than at a disadvantage. In C and D, cannot often carry out suggests that a President with limited time suffers only from an inability to achieve legislative goals frequently, not from a frequent inability to achieve them at all. In C, liable, followed by an infinitive, can legitimately be used to express probability with a bad outcome, but C is otherwise flawed as noted. D’s liable and E’s unable should be followed by an infinitive rather than by a relative clause beginning with that.


黄色部份在讲啥??能否请过路NN解一下....



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-9 9:22:11编辑过]

作者: 我爱宝宝    时间: 2004-6-8 23:36

不是牛牛。

cannot often carry out suggests that a President with limited time suffers only from an inability to achieve legislative goals frequently,不能经常的执行,重心在carry out说明还是执行的不过是limited 执行

原文Aoften unable to ,经常没能力执行,重心在unable to,说明就是经常没能力执行(废话一句)not from a frequent inability to achieve them at all。


作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-6-9 02:25
谢谢宝宝.......我在体会体会......
作者: tulipmontreal    时间: 2004-6-9 09:04
标题: 问个傻傻的阅读问题, 大家别笑我啊!!

cannot often carry out 强调结果,指不能常常执行

is often unable to 强调常常不能执行,强调的是常常没有能力执行,不是有限制的执行

DISCUSSION WELCOMED



作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-6-9 12:55
    经常不能和不能经常,程度不同
作者: LES    时间: 2004-6-9 19:34

be (un)able to 强调能力

can 强调可能性


作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-6-10 06:26
以下是引用dreadpower在2004-6-9 12:55:00的发言:
    经常不能和不能经常,程度不同


呵呵...我之前就卡在这......程度上哪不同.....


请power兄指点.....


作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-6-10 06:28
以下是引用LES在2004-6-9 19:34:00的发言:

be (un)able to 强调能力


can 强调可能性



这是很标准的XDF解释, 只是我觉得这题会不会也有探讨often的修饰......
作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-6-10 10:17

    我经常没时间看书——》几乎没有时间看书


    我没时间经常看书——》有零碎时间看书


     个人感觉



[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-10 12:57:30编辑过]

作者: babypace    时间: 2004-6-10 11:32
I think dreadpower is right.
作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-6-11 07:05
以下是引用dreadpower在2004-6-10 10:17:00的发言:

    我经常没时间看书——》几乎没有时间看书


    我没时间经常看书——》有零碎时间看书


     个人感觉


感谢power兄.....


作者: dreadpower    时间: 2004-6-11 23:02

    狗狗别客气

    最近怎么睡不好吗??


作者: vincent0330    时间: 2004-6-12 02:05
以下是引用dreadpower在2004-6-11 23:02:00的发言:

    狗狗别客气


    最近怎么睡不好吗??


是啊....可能被RC太大......cc


作者: tqbiao    时间: 2005-1-9 21:06

我也是有点晕,看了评论又想了想,发表拙见:

can not often do , often 修饰的是do,

不是can not do ,而是can not often do

也就是说not否定的是often do,

而often be unable to do ,often 修饰的是be unable to do,也就是说to do 是unable的,但不是 always be unable 的,偶尔还是可以的

汉语也有类似的现象,比如说

我总是考不好,明显成绩比较差

我不是总能考的好,成绩比较好的人


作者: 三脚猫    时间: 2005-1-9 23:04

继续前辈们的讨论

我还是支持vincent 的意见,can 强调个人意愿,而be able to强调个人能力。

总统不是没有能力carry out a legislative program.而是受时间所限不能carry out a legislative program.




作者: big_rice    时间: 2005-7-2 12:44

其实在新概念里专门强调过这个区别:


be (un)able to 强调要经过一番努力才能干成某事,can 没有此意思。


作者: pierre_chin    时间: 2005-7-22 01:50

70. A President entering the final two years of a second term is likely to be at a severe disadvantage and often unable to carry out a legislative program.


(A) likely to be at a severe disadvantage and is often unable to


(B) likely severely disadvantaged and often unable to


(C) liable to be severely disadvantaged and cannot often


(D) liable that he or she is at a severe disadvantage and cannot often(A)


(E) at a severe disadvantage, often likely to be unable that he or she can



发现了“SC大全”上的一个小BUG。划线部分少了个is。



我的问题是,这个is能不能省?



作者: UScocoon    时间: 2005-8-19 18:18
有了is是谁和谁并列就很清楚了,不会混淆。
作者: scrogon    时间: 2005-9-20 13:39

cannot和unable的区别能明白


但我突然又想到一个问题,在原句中究竟是倾向于哪个的意思,大家是怎么判断出来的啊?


谢谢NN。。。


作者: scrogon    时间: 2005-9-21 09:48
再问。。。
作者: fuyun    时间: 2005-9-22 04:07
意思是根据原句画线部分确定的阿
作者: seraphblue    时间: 2005-10-14 13:42
dreadpower解释生动形象。
作者: shihho    时间: 2005-10-16 20:14
個人想法:

can/cannot:重點在可以或不可以做某事,而非有無能力做某事。
Eric cannot make a phone call => 媽媽不准Eric打電話(怕Eric偷打色情電話)

able/unable:重點在有無做某事之能力
Eric is unable to make a phone call => Eric不會打電話(Eric是古代人或是Eric是殘障人士)
作者: caowen    时间: 2006-1-23 06:38

应该根据og原文去判断不是吗,是在强调频率的问题,从at all这个词应该可以判断出来og解释错误点在哪里吧


dreadpower解释得非常易懂,支持


作者: 晴天小狗    时间: 2006-10-18 15:07
以下是引用shihho在2005-10-16 20:14:00的发言:
個人想法:

can/cannot:重點在可以或不可以做某事,而非有無能力做某事。
Eric cannot make a phone call => 媽媽不准Eric打電話(怕Eric偷打色情電話)

able/unable:重點在有無做某事之能力
Eric is unable to make a phone call => Eric不會打電話(Eric是古代人或是Eric是殘障人士)

这个解释对吗?有点意思
作者: wu_keming    时间: 2006-11-7 18:29

In C and D, cannot often carry out suggests that a President with limited time suffers only from an inability to achieve legislative goals frequently, not from a frequent inability to achieve them at all.

我的理解:


A "is often unable to carry" often 修饰 unable,表示总统想执行,但是往往不能执行了。

C D  "can not often carry out" often 修饰 carry, 表示总统想经常执行,但是不能。

两者的确是有差别的


作者: chanmidy    时间: 2006-11-12 00:00

A's at a disadvantage > C's be disadvantaged

也就是说,

ADJ>抽象NOUN,不是100%正确的咯?


作者: winnie的美好    时间: 2012-11-7 12:39
我想问 likely to be at a severe disadvantage 和 likely severely disadvantaged 的区别  
有考友回答下吗
作者: ljwqlcl881703    时间: 2013-1-7 19:26
be disadvantaged 表示被损害OR处于不利地位 表意不明
be at a disadvantaged 只表示处于不利地位
作者: slr257    时间: 2013-1-8 00:13
   我经常没时间看书——》几乎没有时间看书

   我没时间经常看书——》有零碎时间看书

    个人感觉


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-10 12:57:30编辑过]

-- by 会员 dreadpower (2004/6/10 10:17:00)

这两句在逻辑上是一个意思。但是,重心不一样。也许这就是OG想说的。
作者: kiwifoodtown    时间: 2013-1-8 09:50
看了你的问题,我没有笑,飘过了。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3