Which of the following most logically completes the argument below?
According to promotional material published by the city of Springfield, more tourists stay in hotels in Springfield than stay in the neighboring city of Harristown .A brochure from the largest hotel in Harristown claims that more tourists stay in that hotel than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel in Springfield.If both of these sources are accurate, however, the county’s “Report on Tourism” must be in error in indicating that _______.
A.more tourists stay in hotel accommodations in Harristown than stay in the Royal Arms Hotel
B.the Royal Arms Hotel is the only hotel in Springfield
C.there are several hotels in Harristown that are larger than the Royal Arms Hotel
D.some of the tourists who have stayed in hotels in Harristown have also stayed in the Royal Arms Hotel
E.some hotels in Harristown have fewer tourist guests each year than the Royal Arms Hotel has
是B 請問E為何不是答案 作者: skyemotion 时间: 2011-5-9 14:01
e对于原文之前的内容没有必然的支持关系作者: cdwayne 时间: 2011-5-9 14:11
先留心前面說的是hotels in springfield, 後面說的是 RA hotel in springfield, 兩城市都沒錯, 則report on tourism要和者兩個城市的結論矛盾, 即, (B), 若只有一家在springfield那前面兩城市必定有一個錯誤。
(E) some H have fewer tourist 已經和H的說法矛盾了, 怎麼會must be accurate呢?