The first trenches that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but independently of the more celebrated city-states of southern Mesopotamia, in what is now southern Iraq.
that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence for centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East that were arising simultaneously with but
that were cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously with but also
having been cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East were arising simultaneously but
cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, yields strong evidence of centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arising simultaneously but also
cut into a 500-acre site at Tell Hamoukar, Syria, have yielded strong evidence that centrally administered complex societies in northern regions of the Middle East arose simultaneously with but这个题答案是E，我想问的是分词修饰确实比从句修饰更为简洁，但是为什么没人怀疑，如果去掉了that were ，A就变成 the first trenches cut into …,没有可能造成歧义吗？一方面 cut into 可以作分词修饰trenches，另一方面不可以作为 trenches的动词吗，从而逻辑意思错误，这个怎么讲？请指教…… 作者: kikisunflower 时间: 2011-5-7 21:11
没歧义的。如果cut是动词，后面要有宾语的。 肯定是cut something into something，不会是something cut into。。。讲不通的……作者: yangmars 时间: 2011-5-8 15:00
对的啊，多谢了啊