ChaseDream

标题: 纠结与A和E之中,GWD-12-Q29,求解释! [打印本页]

作者: gmatbiguo    时间: 2011-5-7 11:06
标题: 纠结与A和E之中,GWD-12-Q29,求解释!
The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.    The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B.    At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C.    There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D.    There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E.    None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

答案选了A,但我我有看到解释说选E.我自己也选了E,但觉得A也蛮有道理的。请NN们帮忙分析一下,到底哪个对的?
作者: hanshipeng    时间: 2011-5-7 11:44
标题: I try
A: The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.May have been unusually small.




作者: Aviva0307    时间: 2011-6-20 20:04
The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.    The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B.    At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C.    There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D.    There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E.    None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

答案选了A,但我我有看到解释说选E.我自己也选了E,但觉得A也蛮有道理的。请NN们帮忙分析一下,到底哪个对的?
-- by 会员 gmatbiguo (2011/5/7 11:06:00)




我认为选A。
A说过去一百年的盐量不能unusually large——必须保证each century和the past hundred years盐量一样,才能用累积总量÷过去一百年的盐量,得出时间。

E说的海洋生物有没有消耗盐,其实并不重要。只要每个世纪海洋生物消耗的盐都一样多就行(每个世纪,海洋中净增盐量恒定即可)
作者: kobegibson    时间: 2011-6-20 20:09
A 一点悬念都没有。

你仔细想想,E是被A包含了。 A项大气。

我去年9月考的,就有这个题。
作者: irisfrance    时间: 2011-7-16 14:30
A 一点悬念都没有。

你仔细想想,E是被A包含了。 A项大气。

我去年9月考的,就有这个题。
-- by 会员 kobegibson (2011/6/20 20:09:20)



呵呵~这个真是解释的好~
作者: htyayyxf    时间: 2011-8-4 17:45
soga
作者: yinshiqi    时间: 2011-12-4 21:55
这道题是挺难的,我第一次也是纠结于A和E,但后来想了后明白了到底怎么回事。。。先说B,大家质疑的最多的,At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.这里的rivers是指同一个given time的,所以要求rivers都有一样的盐浓度是没有必要的,你们想的应该是不同时期的rivers盐浓度相同,这个有关,也有影响,但不是GMAC的人的想法。。。再说E,其实这个也很有迷惑性,但是其实used up一看我就觉得有问题,其实每个时期进入量by rivers和消耗量by biological activities的差值才是salt level的increase,有后面这个也是不影响各个时期的increase的,只要各个时期这个量近似相等,当然本题没有探讨这个问题,E只是提到了消耗量,但并不会因为没有这个assumption就没有了对应的conclusion。不知道我讲明白没有,大家可以借鉴下。。供以后的CDer参考。。

作者: 清水涟漪    时间: 2012-4-9 17:35
看了ls童鞋们的分析觉得选A有道理。
当时做题的时候也是在A和E中徘徊,最后选了A,原因是看到了结论句是说,用这种方法算最大的海洋年龄。
然后A取非的话是有的时候会有大量的盐,所以说算出来的年龄肯定很大了!(可能超出最大年龄。)
而E取非的话就是说有些盐会消耗掉,那样的话,算出来的年龄肯定就小了,也就不可能是maximum了。所以选了E……>_<
作者: justeva    时间: 2012-4-16 22:49
看了ls童鞋们的分析觉得选A有道理。
当时做题的时候也是在A和E中徘徊,最后选了A,原因是看到了结论句是说,用这种方法算最大的海洋年龄。
然后A取非的话是有的时候会有大量的盐,所以说算出来的年龄肯定很大了!(可能超出最大年龄。)
而E取非的话就是说有些盐会消耗掉,那样的话,算出来的年龄肯定就小了,也就不可能是maximum了。所以选了E……>_<
-- by 会员 清水涟漪 (2012/4/9 17:35:16)



the maximum age 似乎不是关键词,我觉得关键还是E增长可以是定速的,那么就对计算结果没有影响了
作者: 比目鱼香肉丝    时间: 2012-4-21 16:41
知道为什么E错了。
谢谢各位。
作者: lingxi1023    时间: 2012-9-19 11:01
The Earth’s rivers constantly carry dissolved salts into its oceans.  Clearly, therefore, by taking the resulting increase in salt levels in the oceans over the past hundred years and then determining how many centuries of such increases it would have taken the oceans to reach current salt levels from a hypothetical initial salt-free state, the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans can be accurately estimated.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

A.    The quantities of dissolved salts deposited by rivers in the Earth’s oceans have not been unusually large during the past hundred years.
B.    At any given time, all the Earth’s rivers have about the same salt levels.
C.    There are salts that leach into the Earth’s oceans directly from the ocean floor.
D.    There is no method superior to that based on salt levels for estimating the maximum age of the Earth’s oceans.
E.    None of the salts carried into the Earth’s oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.

答案选了A,但我我有看到解释说选E.我自己也选了E,但觉得A也蛮有道理的。请NN们帮忙分析一下,到底哪个对的?
-- by 会员 gmatbiguo (2011/5/7 11:06:00)





我认为选A。
A说过去一百年的盐量不能unusually large——必须保证each century和the past hundred years盐量一样,才能用累积总量÷过去一百年的盐量,得出时间。

E说的海洋生物有没有消耗盐,其实并不重要。只要每个世纪海洋生物消耗的盐都一样多就行(每个世纪,海洋中净增盐量恒定即可)
-- by 会员 Aviva0307 (2011/6/20 20:04:14)









对!
作者: 白白想去德国    时间: 2016-11-29 23:24
kobegibson 发表于 2011-6-20 20:09
A 一点悬念都没有。你仔细想想,E是被A包含了。 A项大气。我去年9月考的,就有这个题。 ...

怎么?GMAT考试还能出GWD的原题?
作者: Bradz    时间: 2016-11-30 10:31
这是道数学题。

题干是1、过去100年净流入X盐分;2、历史一共净流入Y盐分;求历史一共多少年(T)?

A说这需要assume过去100年的X值和X的均值类似;那么T=Y/X

E说要考虑盐分的流入量和消耗量;但是题干里面是净流入量,已经包括了流入和消耗了,所以E的不用考虑。
作者: muerbingsha    时间: 2017-4-4 13:13
谢谢楼上的解释,我也是纠结A和E,现在清楚了。
非E是:
some of the salts carried into the Eartch's oceans by rivers are used up by biological activity in the oceans.
这个对argument没影响。

总结下:
1)选项存疑的话,用取非。这个意识要加强。
2)取非涉及antonym, none反面是some




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3