ChaseDream

标题: 莫笑偶笨：大全-11-19 [打印本页]

作者: zcx 时间: 2004-6-7 23:57
标题: 莫笑偶笨：大全-11-19

It is widely assumed that a museum is helped financially when a generous patron donates a potential exhibit. In truth, however, donated objects require storage space, which is not free, and routine conservation, which is rather expensive. Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum’s financial resources.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument above?

(A) To keep patrons well disposed, a museum will find it advisable to put at least some donated objects on exhibit rather than merely in storage.

(B) The people who are most likely to donate valuable objects to a museum are also the people who are most likely to make cash gifts to it.

(C) A museum cannot save money by resorting to cheap storage under less than adequate conditions, because so doing would drive up the cost of conservation.

(D) Patrons expect a museum to keep donated objects in its possession rather than to raise cash by selling them.（E）

(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.

原文说因为存储，维护捐赠的物品都要花钱，所以捐赠品其实加剧了博物馆的财政压力。

E说把东西买下来，这怎样减少财政压力？

不懂啊！教教偶吧！谢谢啦！！

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-6-8 00:15
E是说：有人DONATE OBJECTS，博物馆就不用花钱去买，这岂不减少博物馆财政

作者: zcx 时间: 2004-6-8 08:01

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-6-8 0:15:00的发言：
E是说：有人DONATE OBJECTS，博物馆就不用花钱去买，这岂不减少博物馆财政

gg弄错了吧，E是说博物馆觉得东西价值大，自己买下donated objects

作者: dashasha 时间: 2004-6-8 08:53

以下是引用zcx在2004-6-8 8:01:00的发言：

gg弄错了吧，E是说博物馆觉得东西价值大，自己买下donated objects

MM你搞错了，LAWYER解释的是对的啊。E是说如果没人捐赠的话，博物馆就得花钱买了。所以有人捐赠，博物馆就省银子了。

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-6-8 11:05
E: Objects are of such importance that it is necessary for museum to collect it

作者: zcx 时间: 2004-6-8 21:22

以下是引用lawyer_1在2004-6-8 11:05:00的发言：
E: Objects are of such importance that it is necessary for museum to collect it

晕！还是没懂。不知道锈在什么地方了。

(E) Objects donated by a patron to a museum are often of such importance that the museum would be obliged to add them to its collection through purchase if necessary.被捐赠的冬冬是如此重要，博物馆很乐意在必要时通过买卖把这些冬冬加入到自己的收藏中去。that引导的丛句，主语museum, 谓语would be obliged to....状语through purchase，又没有错啊？如果是这样，那不是博物馆自己买入么？偶怎么和你们理解都不一样呀？急死偶了！多多执教！！谢谢！！！

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2004-6-8 23:09

小妹妹，我建议你什麽都不想，睡个好觉，一醒来就明白了。逻辑题做多了是要放松一下，否则会晕的。

E的意思：Patron捐给博物馆的那些东东常常很重要，以至（如果没人捐献），博物馆须通过购买来收藏。

也就是说，这些东东原本也是要买，现在有人捐了，就不必买，那岂不是省了这笔钱。

看你的帖子，你的理解是博物馆要买这些东东，问题是这东东已经有人捐了，还要买它干什麽。就是因为博物馆不必再买了，才会WEAKEN原文的结论：捐赠恶化财政。如果理解成博物馆要买这东东，那根原文就没关系了

作者: dashasha 时间: 2004-6-9 03:20
和和，LAWYER真是语重心长啊。小妹妹，什么是“IF NECESSARY”啊？就是没人捐赠的时候啊。有人捐，那不就省钱了？

作者: zcx 时间: 2004-6-9 07:56

严重感谢楼上两位的耐心讲解，欧的阅读水平是在。。。。。。现在发现that从句用的是虚拟语气。。。。。。

谢谢，再次谢谢！真是晕！

作者: 晴天小狗 时间: 2006-9-26 10:58

L哥果然是大哥

精辟

作者: zxzhyzcy 时间: 2007-5-21 11:38
我也理解错了~呵呵~谢谢lawyer_1&dashasha~

作者: 吴羽若 时间: 2008-8-19 17:28
原来是这么理解的，难怪我老觉得没答案呢。

作者: smartsky11 时间: 2009-3-16 14:27
啊

作者: FoxAngelina 时间: 2009-3-17 16:18

(*^__^*) 嘻嘻……~拜读

作者: ForeverDark 时间: 2009-7-31 18:50
弱弱地问下，B的意思我是这样理解的：一般获得捐赠的同时也会获得现金，不也是削弱吗？

作者: lxw19 时间: 2010-3-3 19:15
同问，为什么B不对呢

作者: Bit_kimi 时间: 2013-4-1 10:26
我觉得可以把would be理解为虚拟语气，这样可能好理解有点。

作者: wayneleon 时间: 2013-7-10 17:46

lawyer_1 发表于 2004-6-8 23:09
小妹妹，我建议你什麽都不想，睡个好觉，一醒来就明白了。逻辑题做多了是要放松一下，否则会晕的。E的意思 ...

大牛，看了你的讲解我明白E为很么对了，但我不明白B错在什么地方，诚求指教。B是说博物馆在获得这些藏品的同时也通常会获得现金，获得的这些现金不是可以减少资金压力吗。

作者: lawyer_1 时间: 2013-7-12 20:53
看结论的特殊性和具体性
Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a museum’s financial resources.

结论是在讲SUCH GIFTS（这种类型的礼物）对博物馆的经济作用。和人没关系。这类题比较容易混淆。所以我在总结里特提出结论的具体性和特殊性问题。逻辑上讲是概念的外延。

作者: wayneleon 时间: 2013-7-13 13:37

lawyer_1 发表于 2013-7-12 20:53
看结论的特殊性和具体性
Therefore, such gifts exacerbate rather than lighten the demands made on a mu ...

谢谢！！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)