ChaseDream

标题: 探讨一个PREP题,欢迎大家发表意见 [打印本页]

作者: mudiduange    时间: 2011-5-1 23:42
标题: 探讨一个PREP题,欢迎大家发表意见
Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river in

San Antonio winds through the middle of the business district, and the River Walk, or Paseo del Rio,

is the city's most popular attraction.



(A) Unlike many United States cities, where a river is no longer the focal point of urban life, the river

in San Antonio

(B) Unlike the river in many cities in the United States, which is no longer the focal point of urban life,

in San Antonio the river

(C) Today the river in many cities in the United States is no longer the focal point of urban life,

unlike San Antonio, where it

(D) In few United States cities today, a river is the focal point of urban life, but the river in San

Antonio

(E) No longer do many cities in the United States have a river as the focal point of urban life, but in

San Antonio the river

本题正确答案是E。我选择的时候太过主动平行了,认为but后面的句子主语是river,而前句主语是cities。因此选择了D。
 后来看了语法笔记的解释:no longer,把全部否定变成部分否定,改变了原句意思。
我个人觉得不令人信服,我仔细研究了个人认为最关键的原因在于:D选项,翻译过来是:在很少的城市里今天,河流是一个关键的问题对于城市生活,但是在S地的河流。。。。可以看出来,前面是说河流很关键,后面还是很关键,没有形成转折。

另外一点:原文的意思是:在很多城市里,河流不关键;而D选项是:在很少的城市里,河流关键。二者的语义也存在细微差别,当然在语法中,这种差别是允许的,并不一定说原句的语义一定对。所以我认为这个解释也不是特别的令人信服。

 欢迎大家提出更好的解释。


作者: xyf18    时间: 2012-3-12 19:27
刚刚做到这个题,搜到了你的帖子,我觉得你说的已经挺清楚了,你说的就是语法笔记的解释

所谓的全否变成部分否定,我的理解就是:
不否定的时候:在很多城市里,河流是城市生活的关键
全否:        在很多城市里,河流不是城市生活的关键(“在很多城市里”只是一个状语而已)
部分否定:    在很少的城市里,河流是城市生活的关键(把否定的中心放到了状语上)




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3