ChaseDream

标题: prep sc-69 [打印本页]

作者: wakesleep2011 时间: 2011-4-29 18:31
标题: prep sc-69
同上

作者: wakesleep2011 时间: 2011-4-29 18:35

The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters, people who register the Internet domain names of high-profile companies in hopes of reselling the rights to those names for a profit, led to passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling them later.

(A) passing the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(B) the passage of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act in 1999, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent that they will sell

(C) the passage in 1999 of the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling

(D) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, which was passed in 1999, and it allows companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent to sell

(E) the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, passed in 1999 and allowing companies to seek up to $100,000 in damages against those who register domain names with the sole intent of selling
我知道答案就在abc之间，且intent if比 intent that更好，故为a或c。就是allowing与allow了。。。应该是accp法律allow吗。。。。accp的通过allow不行吗？

作者: hermione0527 时间: 2011-4-29 18:57
allowing分词放在句尾可以表示前面所述事情的结果，个人认为这种理解是可以的（The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters导致了法案的通过，结果是允许公司balabala~），但还有一种理解就是修饰的是句子的主语，也就是The proliferation of so-called cybersquatters，这样是不合逻辑的，所以这里修饰有歧义~
另外楼主你忽略了A和C之间还有一个差别哦，就是passing和passage~passing的话感觉是一个过程，而passage是一个结果，在这里显然是导致了法案通过的结果，而不是过程。
所以Ｃ更好。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)