标题: 【讨论】GWD-8-Q38这题没讨论过 [打印本页] 作者: audrey007 时间: 2011-4-29 16:58 标题: 【讨论】GWD-8-Q38这题没讨论过 GWD-8-Q38: Unless tiger hunting decreases, tigers will soon be extinct in the wild. The countries in which the tigers’ habitats are located are currently debating joint legislation that would ban tiger hunting. Thus, if these countries can successfully enforce this legislation, the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured.
The reasoning in the argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
assumes without sufficient warrant that a ban on tiger hunting could be successfully enforced considers the effects of hunting on tigers without also considering the effects of hunting on other endangered animal species fails to take into account how often tiger hunters are unsuccessful in their attempts to kill tigers neglects to consider the results of governmental attempts in the past to limit tiger hunting takes the removal of an impediment to the tigers’ survival as a guarantee of their survival 我觉得答案应该是D，我想这种因果关系不成立。削弱就是以前也这么做过，但是没有成功。。 不知道我的想法错在哪？为什么选E作者: Serena0710 时间: 2011-5-7 18:48
题意是说要想保护老虎不灭绝，就要禁猎，那些禁猎法令得以实施了，the survival of tigers in the wild will be ensured. critical point：把老虎的生存阻碍拿掉了就真的利于老虎survival吗？不一定，可能是因为虎的繁殖能力下降等内因而致使数量变少，这样的话，禁猎也不一定起到作用。 最后一个包括了所有因素，而不是单独的一个。AC 都是个别指出。 这题讨论过，我给你的解释来自于前人的讨论~~~~作者: rabbin 时间: 2011-7-14 12:17
楼上正解……作者: nemiah 时间: 2011-7-14 12:23
呵呵。进错房间了。。。