比如这道题 All groups and organizations shouldfunction as teams in which everyone makes decisions and shares responsibilitiesand duties. Giving one person central authority and responsibility for aproject or task is not an effective way to get work done.” 望前辈们指点~ 感谢~作者: flewrudy 时间: 2011-4-25 21:41
我也是菜鸟。。。。 我觉得各打50大板不一定是个好选择啊，毕竟感觉观点不是很明确啊。。。。 如果上面的文章要写55开的话，那就界定一个范围，比如在哪里哪里，flat是好的。。。 但是，在其他地方就不这样了。。。 个人意见啊 同求指导作者: kikisunflower 时间: 2011-4-25 22:07
看这样是否可行：
开头段，还是要表明对原文观点是态度。 I agree with the author's claim that groups and organizations should function as teams. It is also true that every member in the team is obliged to share responsibilities and duties and has the right to express their ideas in decision making progress. However, I do not agree with the opion that central authority and responsibility will make it ineffective to do a certain project or task.
正文第一段： 支持 正文第二段： 支持 正文第三段： 反驳 正文第四段： 反驳
结尾段：
想偏同意，支持的部分就多写点，多举几个牛彪的例子，想偏反对，驳论的部分就写多点，多举几个牛彪的例子。作者: rooneyfang 时间: 2011-4-26 04:58
I discussed the issue with a lot of MBAs; native Americans. They told me you definitely need to take side when comes to AI writing. America is a country advocate different opinions as long as your point of view is well presented. you can not lingering around both sides. And they criticized me of using fancy words. They told me they are not impressed by my big, fancy words because those words are showy and as if I am trying to cover up my weakness in supporting my view. The main thing they care about is how persuasive my writing is.作者: kikisunflower 时间: 2011-4-26 10:06
I think to take your side does not mean to merely choose from the given sides mentioned in the issue. Your side can be negative, positive or neutral, etc. If we compare the attitudes to the issue to a number axis, the assertions made by the issus on GMAT often appear on the very two ends of the axis, one standing for pure pro while the other standing for pure con. In the beginning part, tell the reader where your attitude locate on the axis. It can fall on any point in the axis and not falling on the very two ends does not mean your point is lingering or vague.作者: rooneyfang 时间: 2011-4-26 22:39
My dear,
In business world, there are only black or white. Thinking of the grey area would not land you a good position. Especially when you are a decision maker. There are only two options. "to implement or not to implement". There is no " let's try this first, if it doesn't work. try another". leaders are risk takers. No company would provide extra funding for a project. You may have plan B. However, in most cases, the plan B is merely a First Aid Kit.作者: kikisunflower 时间: 2011-4-27 18:25
only black or white。。。。。算了，不讲了，楼主你还是以自己的意见为主吧。。。作者: kikisunflower 时间: 2011-4-27 18:27
总之issue的开头，要先重述题目作者的观点，然后再表明自己的立场。
可以同意作者观点， 可以反对作者观点， 可以修正作者的观点， 可以提出平衡观点。
over作者: kikisunflower 时间: 2011-4-27 18:29
还有，亲爱的rooneyfang，我觉得楼主问的是怎么写issue吧，不是问在真实business world怎么样，虽然两个有联系，但是也相当不一样吧。。。。作者: rooneyfang 时间: 2011-4-29 07:27
No matter what, If you want to score high on AI writing. A strong opinion surpass a weak one.作者: flewrudy 时间: 2011-5-3 22:59
这两天看了几篇文章，觉得像这类文章你可以说something is important，然后但不是crucial的，the most important是。。。（可以是一类因素），但这个观点一定要出来