标题: prep 49 我觉得答案有歧义啊~！求解求解~！ [打印本页] 作者: witchingwang 时间: 2011-4-24 23:59 标题: prep 49 我觉得答案有歧义啊~！求解求解~！ It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise for its unrelenting reporting of the Watergate scandal.
A. It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and it was under her command that the paper won high praise
B. It was only after Katharine Graham's becoming publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers, and under her command it had won high praise
C. Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963, and only after that did it move into the first rank of American newspapers, having won high praise under her command
D. Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham became its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post, winning high praise under her command
E. Moving into the first rank of American newspapers only after Katharine Graham's becoming its publisher in 1963, The Washington Post won high praise under her command
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 答案A ， 但是我首先就把AB排除了。 B 时态问题 C having 错 D 没有谓语了 E 虽然读起来抽象，但是没有语法错误吧。本人观点，请拍砖~！ A 。It was only after Katharine Graham became publisher of The Washington Post in 1963 that it moved into the first rank of American newspapers in 1963 难道不存在歧义吗？ 是KG 1963成为publisher 的还是 post 1963 move 到第一的。~！？求解啊~！作者: superfans124 时间: 2011-4-25 03:06
b和e都是时态错，kg成为发行人在前，导致WP成为一流刊物在后，无论赢得好评是在（跻身一流刊物）前还是在后，“赢得”已经是won了，那么kg成为发行人的时态只能是过去时。 d没有动词 c很错，having的问题，让整个后半段（从having到scandal)成为了modifier，但它modify的对象应该紧跟在逗号前，如果C句的意思理解为华盛顿邮报跻身一流美国报刊，是华盛顿邮报赢得赞誉而不是美国报刊。而且第一段kg成为出版人用的是主动语态，KG是主语，但之后又用主动语态说dad it move into...,主语又变成it了。
a为什么正确，不知道，我只能慢慢排除其他选项。。。 你的问题，我倒不觉得有歧义 你可以试试把that的位置挪动一下，看"of the washington post in 1963 that it moved"和"of the washington post that in 1963 it moved"有什么区别。作者: clumsy123 时间: 2011-4-25 08:36
这其实是两个强调句的并列作者: witchingwang 时间: 2011-4-25 09:52
谢谢，好像从时态上去排除又比较正确了。再想想·1