ChaseDream

标题: 问下比较级 more 能不能和 rather than 配 啊? [打印本页]

作者: jy4780163    时间: 2011-4-17 17:03
标题: 问下比较级 more 能不能和 rather than 配 啊?
有点拿不准~问问~
作者: lonelyorchid    时间: 2011-4-18 10:21
举例吧……这么问的话,直觉上是不行。。。
作者: balgirl    时间: 2011-5-2 19:32
Manhattan SC里明确指明这种用法是错误的:
More ... rather than
More ... instead of
More ... as
比较级 + over
都是错误的用法
作者: nononon    时间: 2011-8-23 22:47
谢谢楼上!!!!
作者: heyuhao29    时间: 2014-7-29 11:09
balgirl 发表于 2011-5-2 19:32
Manhattan SC里明确指明这种用法是错误的:More ... rather thanMore ... instead ofMore ... as比较级 + o ...

语法笔记里写明了more...rather than 的用法错误;然而,在07prep 2 的31题

Gone are the sharp edges and jutting planes ofstyles from former eras; instead, designers of everything from cars to computermonitors have adopted a cornerless style of smooth surfaces and curves that is moreergonomic, conforming to the shape of the body rather than flaunting shapefor its own sake.


(A) more ergonomic, conforming to the shape of thebody rather than flaunting shape


(B) more ergonomic, conformed to the body's shapeand not to flaunting shape

(C) ergonomic, more conformed to the shape of thebody and not to shape flaunted

(D) ergonomic, conforming more to the body's shaperather than shape flaunted

(E) ergonomic, conforming more to the shape of thebody than flaunting shape

这题的答案是A,也就是承认了more ... rather than 的用法。
这是怎么回事呢

作者: ianwyb    时间: 2016-9-1 22:15
我也没搞懂 这里的more没有比较对象 如果rather than是和conforming那句搭配的话
不应该有more就有than么?




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3