ChaseDream

标题: 比较之庖丁解牛续之动词补出原则 - - 以as likely as与more likely than应用为例 [打印本页]

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-4-15 02:10
标题: 比较之庖丁解牛续之动词补出原则 - - 以as likely as与more likely than应用为例
总纲：比较中是否要补出动词，一切看是否有歧义。但是当省略了也没有歧义的时候，补出和不补出动词在很多时候就不是绝对性的判断标准à只能用于相对性的比较。

比较中大原则还是看是否有歧义，具体的在庖丁解牛里面也有说，这里只是特别说一下as likely as…和more than的应用：

（一）as likely as:
(1) According to a 1996 study published in the Journal of Human Resources, Americans of Middle Eastern descent were twice as likely as the average American to be self-employed.
à不补出，是因为to do是放在后面了，不可能有歧义。
类似1：The Arthritis Research Institute of America advises women of color that they are twice as likely as White women to get osteoarthritis of the knee.
类似2：According to a survey of graduating medical students conducted by the Association of American Medical Colleges, minority graduates are nearly four times as likely as other graduates to plan on practicing in socioeconomically deprived areas.
(2)According to a new report by the surgeon general, women with less than a high school education were three times as likely to begin smoking as women who went to college.
à不补出，这里to do放在前面还是没有补出were，因为没有歧义。
(3) Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are the current one.
à补出。这个例外是因为不同点the current one是宾语，为了表明它是宾语，所以要加上主谓。
所以要注意：有宾语和没有宾语是不同的。

（二）more than:
(1) 主语比较1：
Stresses that girls experience are more likely to result in depression than are those that boys experience.
à补出，主语比较，因为than前面比较成分已经包含了完整主谓宾，所以要补出are来表明是主语比较。
类似1：prep2-132. A study published in the British Medical Journal showed that women who ate nuts more than five times a week were about one third less likely to suffer from coronary heart disease than were those who ate no nuts at all.
(2) 主语比较2：
Authoritative parents are more likely than permissive parents to have children who as adolescents are self-confident, high in self-esteem, and responsibly independent.
à不补出，主语比较，因为前面成分并没有宾语，所以不需要补出谓语来表明它是主语
类似1：A survey of 765 working women over eighteen years of age found that 60 percent of them worked 40 or more hours a week and that married women with children under eighteen were more likely than other married women to work shifts different from their husbands'.
类似2：A study on couples' retirement transitions found that, unlike men who took new jobs after retiring from their primary careers, women who did so were more likely than those who retired completely to report high marital satisfaction.
类似3：大全675. Studies show that young people with higher-than-average blood pressure whose families have a history of high blood pressure are more likely than others to develop a severe form of the condition.
(3) 状语比较：
Shipwrecks are more likely to be found undisturbed at great depths than in shallow coastal waters, where archaeological remains are exposed to turbulence and are accessible to anyone in scuba gear, whether archaeologist, treasure hunter, or sport diver.
à不补出，状语比较，直接加状语即可。
类似1：大全768.The investor who is uncertain about the future is more likely to put money into blue-chip stocks or treasury bills than into gold.
(4)宾/表语比较：
According to a recent study, the elderly in the United States are four times more likely to give regular financial aid to their children than to receive it from them.
à不补出谓语动词，直接加宾/表语，be likely to do结构中，be为谓语动词，likely为形容词，to do可视为宾/表语。
(5) 其他：
Results of a United States study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine have shown that college-educated women and women living in the South and West are significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than women living in the Northeast and Midwest.
à例外句！！！不补出。但本句属于主语比较，且than前面比较成分已经包含了完整主谓宾，为何不加只有一个理由：即没有歧义，没有use women living in the N and M的歧义。à所以主语比较时，是否补出，并不是绝对性原则，GMAT不会在这一个点上考我们，关键是要进行各选项比较。没有绝对正确的句子！

综上，比较中是否要补出动词，一切看是否有歧义。但是当没有歧义的时候，补出和不补出动词在很多时候就不是绝对性的判断标准à只能用于相对性的比较。

对于除了more likely than...与as likely as...之外的比较补出原则讨论参见下帖：
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-537203-1-1.html
附《比较之庖丁解牛》：
http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-103101-1-1.html

作者: arish 时间: 2011-4-15 02:25
谢谢大牛，非常有用

作者: horsecc 时间: 2011-4-16 11:06
精品啊！

作者: frankiesun 时间: 2011-4-16 11:21
谢谢Aeolueros（对不起，名字写错了，我改过来了！）的详细解释。
这个补出原则非常重要。很有用的解释。跪谢啊！
我通常的做法是：把省略掉的部分尝试补出来，看看逻辑理解是否障碍或者扭曲了原意；其次看看，补出的成分充当了什么成分；最后，我尝试把重复的部分删掉。
可能比较费时费力的办法。
希望Aeolueros理解我的冒昧！呵呵~~~

作者: horsecc 时间: 2011-4-17 11:24
我给状语比较加个例子

类似2：2. GWD-18-Q11
In no other historical sighting did Halley’s comet cause such a worldwide sensation as did its return in 1910-1911.
A.   did its return in 1910-1911
B.   had its 1910-1911 return
C.   in its return of 1910-1911
D.   its return of 1910-1911 did
E.   its return in 1910-1911

作者: 夜色微蓝 时间: 2011-4-17 15:48

这么好的帖子，来晚了来晚拉~~~~~

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-4-26 10:23
frankiesun言重，丝毫未感冒昧。

其实我也是按照你那样的方法去排除的，加上选项之间的比较，感觉其实这种做法并不慢，通常熟练的话还是能够30秒之内判断出来的。

作者: alannesta 时间: 2011-4-26 17:03
前排留名

作者: 爱吃巧克力 时间: 2011-4-27 09:37
谢谢aeo，永远为CD无私奉献的大神

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-4-27 09:44

谢谢aeo，永远为CD无私奉献的大神

-- by 会员爱吃巧克力 (2011/4/27 9:37:45)

mo，谢谢巧克力:-)...
我很平凡的，很多不懂，难得有这么一个平台可以大家一起讨论问题:-D

作者: ZhuLi0829 时间: 2011-5-7 21:39
顺着这个帖请教

作者: ZhuLi0829 时间: 2011-5-7 21:47
标题: 顺着此帖请教aeoluseros一道题目！
GWD26-Q28
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers willbe equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as the current one.

A.equally likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are

B.as likely to exceed the proposed speed limitas they are

其他选项我排除掉了，剩下这两个有点不解，答案给的是B，我也选对了，可是不知道为什么A不对，是否因为be equally likely ...as的缘故，这里的as一定要放进as likely as 作比较吗？如果不用as保留equally请问应该怎么改才是对的呢？

希望我的问题没有太弱，复习到后期常常脑袋秀逗呵呵。PS. aeoluseros整理的新prep语法笔记真的是太有帮助了！

谢谢！

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-5-7 23:42
嗯，错在equally....as...的搭配，可以写成这样：
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed, compared to the current one.

谢谢ZhuLi，编写组的心血之作,aeo只是天蝎花而已:-D

作者: ZhuLi0829 时间: 2011-5-8 14:59
谢谢版主回复神速！^^ 就着您给的这个句子我又有了个问题，（不好意思啊呵呵）
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed, compared to the current one. 这样写是不是在把drivers与the current one做比较？会不会比较对象不对等了？

谢谢aeoluseros指点！

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-5-8 16:29

谢谢版主回复神速！^^ 就着您给的这个句子我又有了个问题，（不好意思啊呵呵）
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be equally likely to exceed the proposed speed, compared to the current one. 这样写是不是在把drivers与the current one做比较？会不会比较对象不对等了？

谢谢aeoluseros指点！

-- by 会员 ZhuLi0829 (2011/5/8 14:59:30)

按照GMAT现有的题目现象来看，compared to比较特殊可以修饰临近分句，也可以修饰句尾名词，而修饰哪个是看逻辑含义的。the current one如果修饰临近分句而one指代driver，意思会很奇怪，所以compared to修饰的是speed，one同时也指代它，但是可以肯定的一点是这个句子没有用as...as...的结构好。

作者: zhythebest 时间: 2011-5-13 20:33
这段时间一直在看牛牛们写的语法帖子，这一块有了很大起色，补出这部分我之前看了LZM的，讲的实在是太粗略了，没有感觉，今天看了真叫一个醍醐灌顶，如沐春风啊。上一篇我也看过了，都很有帮助，六月就要考试了，再三感谢！

作者: 若雪 时间: 2011-6-9 02:19
膜拜aeo大神ING~~~~
最近碰到很多比较的题目自己在总结动词是不是要补出的问题就看到了这个贴~~

不过有个小问题~
(1) 主语比较1：
Stresses that girls experience are more likely to result in depression than are those boys experience.
à补出，主语比较，因为than前面比较成分已经包含了完整主谓宾，所以要补出are来表明是主语比较。

这边是不是需要写成are those THAT boys experience? 还是可以连that也一起省略？
默默说我第一次读的时候读成了those修饰boys然后想了好一会....

作者: MarsTOF 时间: 2011-6-9 11:23
新帖要顶。。

作者: jimrockey 时间: 2011-6-14 10:59
谢谢lz

作者: crack25 时间: 2011-6-15 12:51
EN ,我也是顺着想问题目

Despite recent increases in sales and cash flow that have propelled automobile companies' common stocks to new highs, several industry analysts expect automakers, in order to conserve cash, to set dividends more conservatively than they were
A.
to set dividends more conservatively than they were
B.
to set dividends more conservatively than they have been
C.
to be more conservative than they have been in setting dividends
D.
that they will be more conservative than they were in setting dividends
E.
that they will be more conservative than they have been to set dividends
当时有人说可以走conserve的路线，没问题了解，但是看到笔记上n多人是在分析助动词对应问题，所以想求证各位怎么由主动入手推的，主要从ABC说明就可以

作者: bmwsherry 时间: 2011-7-12 11:38
谢谢！非常哟用！

作者: yangmars 时间: 2011-7-14 11:12
87. (29293-!-item-!-188;#058&003892)
Results of a United States study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine have shown college-educated women and women living in the South and West to be significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living in the Northeast and Midwest.
(A) college-educated women and women living in the South and West to be significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living
(B) college-educated women and women living in the South and West as significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they are living
(C) college-educated women and those living in the South and West being significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they lived
(D) that college-educated women and women who live in the South and West are significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as were women that lived
(E) that college-educated women and women living in the South and West are significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than women living

50 Many teenagers undergo stress, but results of a recent study indicate that the patterns of stress that girls experience are more likely to result in depression than are those that boys experience.
(A) are those that boys experience
(B) what boys experience
(C) boys' experience would
(D) boys' stress patterns do
(E) stress patterns of boys
87题中第二个women前不需加be动词，women (living in A) are more likely to use
hormones than women (living in B). 从语法上而言，这个不是肯定要错的吗？为何不用补出are,看了很多人的解释帖子，有的说如果是比use 第二个women前腰加to，但是如果比的是hormone和women，这两个use的对象呢？那不加to在语法上也是没错的啊？感觉这种解释不在点上啊？不知道牛们能否给解释下啊？
50题中，几乎是一摸一样的结构，这个就果断补出了动词啊。是这两题有区别么？求解释！！

作者: nemiah 时间: 2011-7-14 11:40
college-educated women and women living in the South and West are significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than women living in the Northeast and Midwest

LZ这个其他情况我觉得可以这样解释：

因为比较是在一个主系表的结构，主系表的后面的比较对象应该只有主语就可以了，因为表语和主语事实上是等价的概念，不同于主谓宾，需要补出谓语动词避免和宾语发生比较。

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-7-23 14:33
没有区别. 对于be more likely to这样的主系表结构，如果是主语比较，且系动词不补出并不会产生歧义，则系动词可省。其实类似的比较形式在语法笔记2008里也有提到

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-7-23 14:36
嗯，这个帖子说的就是be more likely to ... than和be as likely to as的主系表结构。这个结构里如果是主语比较，而且系动词补出与否都不会产生歧义，那么比较词后的系动词可省可不省。

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-7-23 14:38

膜拜aeo大神ING~~~~
最近碰到很多比较的题目自己在总结动词是不是要补出的问题就看到了这个贴~~

不过有个小问题~
(1) 主语比较1：
Stresses that girls experience are more likely to result in depression than are those boys experience.
à补出，主语比较，因为than前面比较成分已经包含了完整主谓宾，所以要补出are来表明是主语比较。

这边是不是需要写成are those THAT boys experience? 还是可以连that也一起省略？
默默说我第一次读的时候读成了those修饰boys然后想了好一会....

-- by 会员若雪 (2011/6/9 2:19:14)

若雪说得太棒了，嗯，这里少打了字。不过若雪说的正是有时候先行词明明在定语从句里做宾语，却要补出关系代词的原因之一。

作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-7-23 14:45

EN ,我也是顺着想问题目

Despite recent increases in sales and cash flow that have propelled automobile companies' common stocks to new highs, several industry analysts expect automakers, in order to conserve cash, to set dividends more conservatively than they were
A.
to set dividends more conservatively than they were
B.
to set dividends more conservatively than they have been
C.
to be more conservative than they have been in setting dividends
D.
that they will be more conservative than they were in setting dividends
E.
that they will be more conservative than they have been to set dividends
当时有人说可以走conserve的路线，没问题了解，但是看到笔记上n多人是在分析助动词对应问题，所以想求证各位怎么由主动入手推的，主要从ABC说明就可以

-- by 会员 crack25 (2011/6/15 12:51:07)

主动入手?momo...不明白诶

作者: 七重纱 时间: 2011-8-10 12:14
感谢aeo大n，醍醐灌顶！
很多时候确实像nn所说，是要根据语意判断，没有绝对准则，这就是gmat的可恶之处

作者: kidvii 时间: 2011-8-14 17:53
85 .According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation's four-year colleges and universities.
(A) equivalent to the enrollment of
(B) the equivalent of those enrolled in
(C) equal to those who are enrolled in
(D) as many as the enrollment of
(E) as many as are enrolled in

这题是例外还是？
实在看不出这叫什么比较。

作者: CGuo 时间: 2011-8-22 17:37
谢谢，谢谢。。很实用。。

作者: Yvonne1017 时间: 2011-8-23 22:29
好贴啊！！！

我一直对比较迷迷糊糊的~~一直靠语感做题，今天看到了NN的帖子，茅塞顿开~！！
哇哈哈~~谢谢啊！！！

作者: lpbird 时间: 2011-8-31 16:05
收藏贴啊，太谢谢了，每次看到你的贴都觉得这个问题肯定搞定了，呵呵。牛人就是不一样啊。

作者: Rolita 时间: 2012-1-24 23:14
谢谢楼主
回复以共勉

作者: pirate舟 时间: 2012-2-24 15:36
忍不住感谢一下

作者: ddeykx 时间: 2012-3-3 12:09
真的真的很有用！我终于弄懂了~~谢谢lz！！~

作者: baixuefei0524 时间: 2012-4-25 10:07
标题: 谢谢版主，继续提问
还是这个题：87.(29293-!-item-!-188;#058&003892)

Results of a United States study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine have shown college-educated women and women living in the South and West to be significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living in the Northeast and Midwest

(A) college-educated women and women living in the South and West to be significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living

(B) college-educated women and women living in the South and West as significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they are living

(C) college-educated women and those living in the South and West being significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they lived

(D) that college-educated women and women who live in the South and West are significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as were women that lived

(E) that college-educated women and women living in the South and West are significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than women living
E为什么不用在最后的women前面加are呢？主语的比较不是要加are来避免歧义吗？难道这里不加也不会有歧义？

大家讨论的也不少了，首先引用一下观点

我认为是要加的，但其它选项的错误实在是太明显了。对于加不加谓语动词，我的判断是会不会产生歧义，这道题加are就表明是主语之间的比较，但实际上supplemental hormone也是名词，完全可以理解为用more likely to use supplemental hormone than use women....尽管很arkward，语法上是行得通的。anyway，没人说gmat的语法是完美的
-- by 会员 yexuu (2010/10/27 19:35:57)

我觉得有没有歧义主要是看理解出来的意思通不通~也就是说要make sense~这个如果按照LZ的理解就是女人用荷尔蒙比用女人多，可是LZ要怎么看待这句话想表达的含义呢？这种完全不会理解错误的情况下就可以省略动词了~
其实GMAT很多问题都不能抠的太死，很多NN都说过SC的答案是比出来的，尽管正确答案也未必是最优的那一个~
-- by 会员坤kun (2011/6/2 13:29:07)

不用加，往往加助动词的原因是因为为了明确是主语与主语之间的比较，但是这道题，显然不会发生语意上的歧义，所以是没必要加的，因为在语义上 college-educated women and women are more likely to use A than women living in the Northeast and Midwest, 不可能理解成 women use A 比 use 另外一个地区的women 多吧。。这样逻辑意思太离谱了，所以不加完全不会造成歧义的。

另外 D 加了助动词，虽然不错，但是它的助动词是were 不是are ，时态错误了。。因为不是在比较两个不同时期的women ，而是在比较同一时期但在不同地方的women。

hope it helps~
-- by 会员 jameshzd (2011/7/16 21:50:28)

通过大家的讨论，我尝试总结为：其他选项相比正确选项绝对错误；而且该选项所谓的歧义中的那个非主流的意思太离谱，能够在逻辑上被直接否定，所以没有必要加助动词。

但我的问题是：歧义，就是从语法上会产生多于一种的理解或解读。但是在GMAT中的歧义错误中，其实大部分能够被我们的大脑从逻辑上理解作者想表达什么，从而排除另外一个意思。比如我们都知道小明吃苹果比小红吃苹果快，不可能是比吃小红快。但是有的还是被认为歧义，有的却没有认为歧义。

不知道可否得出比较歧义问题不是一个绝对考点的结论

作者: babybearmm 时间: 2012-4-25 10:58
ls同学给我PM，说下我对ls发言的看法吧，这个贴子ae斑斑总结得挺好的。

"歧义，就是从语法上会产生多于一种的理解或解读。"
我认为只有存在>1种 grammatically AND LOGICALLY satisfied interpretations
这才算是歧义。

很多大家所谓的“歧义”，根本就不logically satisfied!

"其实大部分能够被我们的大脑从逻辑上理解作者想表达什么，从而排除另外一个意思。比如我们都知道小明吃苹果比小红吃苹果快，不可能是比吃小红快。但是有的还是被认为歧义，有的却没有认为歧义。"

好吧，从逻辑上说，并非你觉得 “我不会理解错，那么这句子就没歧义”
而是：“所有具有正常逻辑思维能力的人都不会理解错，那么这句子就没歧义”

Again, 就是设想所有gramatically and logically satisfied interpretations
看是否大于1种

Analogy:
就像DS题目，
如果满足所有条件的正确答案大于1种，那么就叫做"not sufficient"
如果满足所有条件的正确答案只有1种，那么就叫做"sufficient"

注意，我们考虑的是“满足所有条件的正确答案”，不满足条件的答案不在考虑范围内！
相当于说：语法和逻辑不能完全satisfied的“歧义理解”，根本不在考虑范围内。

作者: wangjieava23 时间: 2012-4-30 16:28
顶顶

作者: ricky901218 时间: 2012-7-28 11:07
aeo真心大神啊！看得我茅塞顿开

作者: rabbit1937 时间: 2012-8-4 15:12

87. (29293-!-item-!-188;#058&003892)
Results of a United States study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine have shown college-educated women and women living in the South and West to be significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living in the Northeast and Midwest.
(A) college-educated women and women living in the South and West to be significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as women living
(B) college-educated women and women living in the South and West as significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they are living
(C) college-educated women and those living in the South and West being significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than if they lived
(D) that college-educated women and women who live in the South and West are significantly more likely to be using supplemental hormones as were women that lived
(E) that college-educated women and women living in the South and West are significantly more likely to use supplemental hormones than women living

50 Many teenagers undergo stress, but results of a recent study indicate that the patterns of stress that girls experience are more likely to result in depression than are those that boys experience.
(A) are those that boys experience
(B) what boys experience
(C) boys' experience would
(D) boys' stress patterns do
(E) stress patterns of boys
87题中第二个women前不需加be动词，women (living in A) are more likely to use
hormones than women (living in B). 从语法上而言，这个不是肯定要错的吗？为何不用补出are,看了很多人的解释帖子，有的说如果是比use 第二个women前腰加to，但是如果比的是hormone和women，这两个use的对象呢？那不加to在语法上也是没错的啊？感觉这种解释不在点上啊？不知道牛们能否给解释下啊？
50题中，几乎是一摸一样的结构，这个就果断补出了动词啊。是这两题有区别么？求解释！！

-- by 会员 yangmars (2011/7/14 11:12:28)

87题中，如果说可能产生歧义的话，那么或许是在likely to use SH than women上面，到底是谁被USE，当然，我想结论是显而易见的——SH，而非women，所以不存在歧义。

然而在50题中，歧义点或产生在result in X than Y 上面，而此题中的Y 如果被导致的话，也貌似能讲通哦。所以为了避免歧义还是要补出的。

总结一下，主系表中主语比较还是要通过含义来判断是不是要补出助动词。这里面表语如果是介词短语的话，往往歧义点就在介宾的身上，要格外注意啦！

作者: 二楼往下掉 时间: 2012-8-9 12:17

-- by 会员若雪 (2011/6/9 2:19:14)

貌似顿开！！！一直处于被比较，as折磨的状态......

作者: 75663131 时间: 2012-8-19 14:54
斑竹总结得真好赞一个！

作者: sbyangyi 时间: 2012-10-17 23:18
mark

作者: loveleft504 时间: 2013-3-17 17:04
thanks a lot.

作者: bejamin1111 时间: 2013-7-21 14:41
mark!非常强大的帖子！

作者: 包子不包子 时间: 2013-9-5 08:10
怒顶起！！

作者: janice_dor 时间: 2014-6-2 13:31
太有用了，谢大神！

作者: fausttao 时间: 2014-6-28 04:01
(3) Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are(likely to exceed) the current one. 将来的时间新的宾语现在的时间现在的宾语(2个对比补出)

作者: Satanilles 时间: 2014-8-11 10:33
几年后再来看这个还有人回答我吗- -
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are the current one.
有没有人能帮我分析一下这个句子啊，这个是拿什么和什么比较？ "as they are the current one"这里面的they are是指什么啊，drivers吗？还是limit speed??，speed不是不可数名词嘛，那为什么用they，drivers?那为什么是current one??
求指点！！！！！

作者: Satanilles 时间: 2014-8-11 10:41

Satanilles 发表于 2014-8-11 10:33
几年后再来看这个还有人回答我吗- -
Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to ...

好吧，我自己找到了，补全说是这样的
“Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are likely to exceed the current one. ”
为什么likely to exceed可以省了啊- -，as they are the current one看起来不是很奇怪吗- -？？？？

自己顶一下，有木有人来管管我...

作者: 成成儿 时间: 2014-12-8 11:10
n年后。。。
(3) Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the proposed speed limit as they are the current one.
they---指代的是drivers
补出助动词are是因为时态不一致吧？前面是将来时，后面是现在时。即drivers will be likely to exceed the proposed speed limit 和 drivers are （likely to exceed） the current one.

作者: Hendy 时间: 2014-12-29 17:56
全都收藏了

作者: Linda_Z 时间: 2015-1-29 21:40

成成儿发表于 2014-12-8 11:10
n年后。。。
(3) Traffic safety officials predict that drivers will be as likely to exceed the propos ...

赞同时态不一样需要补出，附句子：Thomas Eakins's powerful style and his choices of subject--the advances in modern surgery, the discipline of sport, the strains of individuals in tension with society or even with themselves--were as disturbing to his own time as they are
compelling for ours.
as...as 结构主语比较后面的动词省略规则到底是怎样的呀？

作者: 成成儿 时间: 2015-1-29 21:48

Linda_Z 发表于 2015-1-29 21:40
赞同时态不一样需要补出，附句子：Thomas Eakins's powerful style and his choices of subject--the adv ...

省略的原则的做法是：用助动词代替相应的动词，比如实意动词用do, does, did；有时态啊，被动语态啊，里面有have 或者 be，这时用相应的have或者be。
省略的原则是：前面出现了相同的词才能省略。
比如，如果前面出现了make/makes/made，那么就用do/does/didi代替，若果是has/have made，则用has/have；如果是 is/are/was/were making，则用 is/are/was/were。这里面，只有前面出现了相同的make/makes/made/have made/making才能省略。否则要写出具体词，不能替代。

作者: Linda_Z 时间: 2015-1-29 22:37

成成儿发表于 2015-1-29 21:48
省略的原则的做法是：用助动词代替相应的动词，比如实意动词用do, does, did；有时态啊，被动语态啊，里 ...

谢啦，好详细~
as as我好像已经想明白了。。

作者: songziwei 时间: 2015-10-26 14:57
感谢分享！

作者: HeleneW 时间: 2016-2-13 17:18
Mark一下！

作者: Lenaw 时间: 2017-1-8 15:47
腻害了腻害了！！来晚了啊！！之前一直就是likely的句子就一脸懵逼，完全凭语感，也是时对时不对的。。看了这个豁然开朗啊！！终于知道哪些要补哪些不补。比较对象到底是啥了。。。感谢啊！！

作者: einfucs 时间: 2017-12-19 19:51
感谢分享！

作者: tobeewong 时间: 2017-12-24 23:14
顶楼主！

作者: 丁丁丁淼淼 时间: 2018-8-3 14:53
感谢楼主

作者: gumgum330 时间: 2018-8-5 23:09
感谢分享！

作者: sdxhkust 时间: 2019-5-21 17:12
感谢分享！

作者: lhamhahahahaz 时间: 2019-5-21 18:06
感谢 ?

作者: lsgzq 时间: 2020-10-30 09:14
顶楼主！

作者: lbnlcw 时间: 2020-12-9 18:27
Mark一下！

作者: 3410 时间: 2023-6-1 11:01
Mark一下！

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)