ChaseDream

标题: 请教LSAT－8－II－3,21,24 [打印本页]

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-31 11:08
标题: 请教LSAT－8－II－3,21,24
3. Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville's current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council's membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council's membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the cha1lengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville's city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

答案：A，我觉得A，B都对。

21. It is very difficult to prove today that a painting done two or three hundred years ago, especially one without a signature or with a questionably authentic signature, is indubitably the work of this or that particular artist. This fact gives the traditional attribution of a disputed painting special weight, since that attribution carries the presumption of historical continuity. Consequently, an art historian arguing for a deattribution will generally convince other art historians only if he or she can persuasively argue for a specific reattribution.

Which one of the following, if true, most strongly supports the position that the traditional attribution of a disputed painting should not have special weight?

(A) Art dealers have always been led by economic self-interest to attribute any unsigned paintings of merit to recognized masters rather than to obscure artists.

(B) When a painting is originally created, there are invariably at least some eyewitnesses who see the artist ac work, and thus questions of correct attribution cannot arise at that time.

(C) There are not always clearly discernible differences between the occasional interior work produced by a master and the very best work produced by a lesser talent.

(D) Attribution can shape perception inasmuch as certain features that would count as marks of greatness in a master's work would be counted as signs or inferior artistry if a work were attributed to a minor artist.

(E) Even though some masters had specialists assist them with certain detail work, such as depicting lace, the resulting works are properly attributed to the masters alone.

答案：A，我选C

24. Dr. Ruiz: Dr. Smith has expressed outspoken antismoking views in public. Even though Dr. Smith is otherwise qualified, clearly she cannot be included on a panel that examines the danger of secondhand cigarette smoke. As an organizer of the panel, I want to ensure that the panel examines the issue in an unbiased manner before coming to any conclusion.

Which one of the following, if true, provides the strongest basis for countering Dr. Ruiz' argument that Dr. Smith should not be included on the panel?

(A) A panel composed of qualified people with strong but conflicting views on a particular topic is more likely to reach an unbiased conclusion than a panel composed of people who have kept their views, if any, private.

(B) People who hold strong views on a particular topic tend to accept new evidence on that topic only if it supports their views.

(C) A panel that includes one qualified person with publicly known strong views on a particular topic is more likely to have lively discussions than a panel that includes only people with no well-defined views on that topic.

(D) People who have expressed strong views in public on a particular topic are better at raising funds to support their case than are people who have never expressed strong views in public.

(E) People who have well-defined strong views on a particular topic prior to joining a panel are often able to impose their views on panel members who are not committed at the outset to any conclusion.

答案：A，我选E。

谢谢。　

作者: cranberry 时间: 2003-5-31 21:04
1，b不是一定要对，因为存在可能是只有支持目前不是官员的人当选的市民参加，就可以保证官员大换血。

2，C不对，大师的二流作品和二流画家的顶级作品没太大差别，说明分清不容易，但不能因为不容易，别人分清就是瞎说，没什么意义吧。

3，E的错误很明显，炉子的意思是史密斯反对吸烟，所以在衡量二手烟的危害时可能会有倾向性。E说的是这样的人会在还没的出结论用她的观点影响别人，这不就拧了吗？正好支持炉子了

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-31 22:54

以下是引用cranberry在2003-5-31 21:04:00的发言：
1，b不是一定要对，因为存在可能是只有支持目前不是官员的人当选的市民参加，就可以保证官员大换血。

cranberry,你说的是什么意思啊？

作者: cranberry 时间: 2003-5-31 23:18
比如官员都是1，3，5等单数社区的，而选民都选自己社区的，那么即使只有一半选民参选，如2。4。6，那么135的官员一定不会当选。
但这只是可能，不是必然。

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-31 23:20
天啊，T24 ，是我没看清题意，是counter 卢斯的观点，我做反了，真是不好意思。对不起啊。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-31 23:27:52编辑过]

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-31 23:25

以下是引用cranberry在2003-5-31 23:18:00的发言：
比如官员都是1，3，5等单数社区的，而选民都选自己社区的，那么即使只有一半选民参选，如2。4。6，那么135的官员一定不会当选。
但这只是可能，不是必然。

可是，most 的意思是大多数，>50%，这是必然的，会当选。

不明白A为什么会比B好？谢谢。

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-31 23:27
T21 ，A是怎么削弱结论的呢？谢谢。

作者: cranberry 时间: 2003-5-31 23:35
即使所有的人都投票，但每个人都只投给自己的社区的那个候选人，那么如果如果选民的住址不变，当选的代表应该是不变的，对吗？那如何大部改选呢？我的理解就到此，请mindfree来说明吧，不好意思了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-31 23:36:16编辑过]

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-5-31 23:39

以下是引用cranberry在2003-5-31 23:35:00的发言：
即使所有的人都投票，但每个人都只投给自己的社区的那个候选人，那么如果如果选民的住址不变，当选的代表应该是不变的，对吗？那如何大部改选呢？我的理解就到此，请mindfree来说明吧，不好意思了。

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-5-31 23:36:16编辑过]

谢谢cranberry的解释。

如果选民都投票，而且只投代表自己利益的人，人人如此，那么就都改选了。这跟地址有什么关系吗？不明白地说。

作者: cranberry 时间: 2003-5-31 23:45
代表自己的利益吗？好象必须是邻居啊。偶解释不清了，呵呵

作者: joywzy 时间: 2003-6-2 13:12

以下是引用cranberry在2003-5-31 23:45:00的发言：
代表自己的利益吗？好象必须是邻居啊。偶解释不清了，呵呵

这题到底该怎么理啊?mindfree能说说吗?

作者: ecsniffer 时间: 2004-3-4 10:52
A

Art    dealers    have    always    been    led    by    economic    self-interest    to    attribute    any    unsigned    paintings    of    merit    to    recognized    masters    rather

than    to    obscure    artists.

指出可能有人为了自己的私利attribute    any    unsigned    paintings    of    merit    to    recognized    masters    ，而依照传统方法这将convince其他人，从而错误地确认了这些paintings的年份

不选C的原因关键是这道题的结论强调的是

Consequently,    an    art    historian    arguing    for    a    deattribution    will    generally

convince    other art historians only if he or she can persuasively argue for

a    specific    reattribution.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-3-4 16:54:52编辑过]

作者: ypngzhang 时间: 2006-12-23 21:12

3. Citizen of Mooresville: Mooresville's current city council is having a ruinous effect on municipal finances. Since a majority of the incumbents are running for reelection, I am going to campaign against all these incumbents in the upcoming city council election. The only incumbent I will support and vote for is the one who represents my own neighborhood, because she has the experience necessary to ensure that our neighborhoods interests are served. If everyone in Mooresville would follow my example, we could substantially change the council's membership.

Assuming that each citizen of Mooresville is allowed to vote only for a city council representative from his or her own neighborhood, for the council's membership to be changed substantially, it must be true that

(A) at least some other voters in Mooresville do not make the same exception for their own incumbent in the upcoming election

(B) most of the eligible voters in Mooresville vote in the upcoming election

(C) few of the incumbents on the Mooresville city council have run for reelection in previous elections

(D) all of the seats on the Mooresville city council are filled by incumbents whose terms are expiring

(E) none of the cha1lengers in the upcoming election for seats on Mooresville's city council are better able to serve the interests of their neighborhoods than were the incumbents

看了所有的讨论贴，还是不明白。

恳请NN解释一下原文说的什么，以及A说的什么。谢谢！

作者: youyou3941 时间: 2008-7-17 22:27

简单点说就是，我只vote那对我们区有利的incumbent，大家都像我一样concil就要大换血了

潜在前提是：别的voter不会像我一样认为他们区的incumbent是对他们有利的，如果这样还是选了原来的incumbent了

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)