ChaseDream

标题: 逻辑题求解。。。求解,纠结中。。。。 [打印本页]

作者: donghaonan11    时间: 2011-4-8 19:09
标题: 逻辑题求解。。。求解,纠结中。。。。
Downtown Villieu was once a flourishing business district, but most Villieu-area businesses are now located only in the suburbs.The office buildings downtown lack the modern amenities most business operators demand today.To lure more businesses downtown, Villieu officials plan to have several modern office buildings constructed and to offer reduced local tax rates to any business that leases space in a new downtown building.



Which of the following, if true, most threatens the plan's likelihood of success?



(A) Most of the businesses currently located in downtown Villieu have long-term leases on the space they occupy there.

(B) The existing office buildings in downtown Villieu have, on average, a much higher vacancy rate than do office buildings in Villieu's suburbs.

(C) The local tax rates in Villieu's suburbs are significantly lower than downtown Villieu's proposed rate for businesses that lease space in the new office buildings.

(D) Most of the businesses that currently lease office space in downtown Villieu also lease office space in Villieu's suburbs.

(E) With the new office buildings, downtown Villieu would have a greater amount of modern office space than any other downtown business district in the region.


A为什么不行呢,没有地了,就没有buildings constructed 给你建,就吸引不来businesses。

作者: donghaonan11    时间: 2011-4-8 19:16
顶,帮帮回答下呗
作者: donghaonan11    时间: 2011-4-8 19:26
帮忙回答一下呗

作者: donghaonan11    时间: 2011-4-8 19:26
好人有好报,回答一下呗
作者: ak007    时间: 2011-4-8 19:56
选C?
作者: donghaonan11    时间: 2011-4-8 20:00
是的。但是A 怎么错了?
作者: ak007    时间: 2011-4-8 20:06
a是说的现存的建筑,跟吸引business木有关系吧~
作者: ak007    时间: 2011-4-8 20:07
a是说的现存的business,跟吸引business木有关系吧~我觉得是无关选项
而且缺的是便利设施
作者: donghaonan11    时间: 2011-4-8 20:12
哦了。谢谢
作者: ak007    时间: 2011-4-8 20:15
而且题目里没说缺地,缺的是便利措施
这些企业所在地和新建大楼没冲突
让政府的目的达不成,就要削弱建楼,减税两措施之一或全都削弱。
c削弱了减税措施达不成。
作者: ak007    时间: 2011-4-8 20:16
额…拿手机上总是慢半拍……囧
作者: aaabbcca    时间: 2011-9-11 10:51
A Obviously has nothing to do
作者: hahaxiaoqishi    时间: 2011-9-11 11:04
A为什么不行呢,没有地了,就没有buildings constructed 给你建,就吸引不来businesses。

A的意思你理解错了,A的意思是那些在Villieu的businesses希望有长期的地方租约
作者: HsiaoYuChen    时间: 2011-9-11 12:12
政府要吸引new business的政策, 跟目前已在downtown有office的business無關.

又因為原題已說明, 目前這區缺乏此一商業動能.

如果根據A所推論:因為長期合約-->所以區域飽和.

是和原題相違背的.
作者: dongkailin    时间: 2011-9-11 19:40
LZ的A选项是无关选项 LZ过度推理了
作者: iamjasmineshi    时间: 2014-12-3 20:00
(A) Most of the businesses currently located in downtown Villieu have long-term leases on the space they occupy there.文中没有说要把现在的大楼铲了来建造新大楼。既然没有这个info,下面的推理也就不成立。没有的info不要自己infer。
(B) The existing office buildings in downtown Villieu have, on average, a much higher vacancy rate than do office buildings in Villieu's suburbs.是在说现存的影响,而题目要求的是新建的大楼。
(C) The local tax rates in Villieu's suburbs are significantly lower than downtown Villieu's proposed rate for businesses that lease space in the new office buildings.因为tax的缘故,而tax是plan的一个卖点,削弱了计划执行的可能性。
(D) Most of the businesses that currently lease office space in downtown Villieu also lease office space in Villieu's suburbs.无关,无法削弱。
(E) With the new office buildings, downtown Villieu would have a greater amount of modern office space than any other downtown business district in the region.只是在说原文这个plan的结果,无法削弱。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3