标题: OG12-SC-112 求解~~ [打印本页] 作者: sullivan215 时间: 2011-4-5 13:29 标题: OG12-SC-112 求解~~ As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision. (A) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision, it would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind if it were an adult with such vision. (B) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500, or legally blind as an adult. (C) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision would be rated about 20/500; qualifying it to be legally blind if an adult. (D) A baby emerges from the darkness of the womb with a rudimentary sense of vision that would be rated about 20/500; an adult with such vision would be deemed legally blind. (E) As a baby emerges from the darkness of the womb, its rudimentary sense of vision, which would deemed legally blind for an adult, would be rated about 20/500.
本题答案为D，小弟不解的是OG对于选项E的解释是："Subordinate clause beginning with which is awkward and ambiguous."which在这里真得很不妥吗？是什么原因呢？还请NN指点迷津~多谢呀！作者: sullivan215 时间: 2011-4-6 10:41
自己先顶一下~NN出现吧~作者: machao924 时间: 2011-4-7 03:12
我是这样理解的，OG说which指代不清楚是因为它可能指代vision或者sense，说它awkward是因为它引导的从句说它将使一个成人在法律上被看作盲人。但此时，这个which还没有被定义为rated about 50/200（后一句话才说明了这一点）。此外，句子中用的是deemed如果是动词，跟在would后面不应该加ed。如果是形容词，应该在其之前加上系动词be。D当中使用的是be deemed，很好地处理了这个问题。作者: sullivan215 时间: 2011-4-7 07:45
真心楼上的解答~！ 看来GMAT对句子前后位置的逻辑性要求就像编程一样严格，即使我们能读懂意思，但是每一句话的位置在这里都要斟酌...作者: machao924 时间: 2011-4-8 04:35
你的回答是一个fragment sentence，应该拿去作为美国人考中国GMAT的考题。作者: OO335722076 时间: 2011-4-28 18:53
我想问下这里的which 怎么能指代vision 和sense 呢 sense of vision 不是只能指代核心词sense 吗 谢谢作者: jiaying52 时间: 2011-5-2 15:06
我觉得有歧义的原因是，瞎得对象不应该是sense of vision而应该是adult,而不是sense或者是vision,否则of短语不是都不能被which修饰，都有歧义了嘛 请指教！作者: lei825 时间: 2012-1-27 22:03
我觉得应该是限制和非限的问题，用了Which则表明此WHICH引导的此句无关紧要，可去掉，但这部分恰是重点要说明的，所以不能用which，要用that~作者: 浅浅123 时间: 2012-1-27 22:50
这题我刚刚做过 which 就近修饰vision vision 带入定语从句 vision would deemed legally blind for an adult.逻辑意思不合理