ChaseDream

标题: 可有人庖丁解牛一下, 这个比较? [打印本页]

作者: jaze    时间: 2011-4-4 21:27
标题: 可有人庖丁解牛一下, 这个比较?
Soaringtelevision costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidentialcampaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previouselection.

A.   a greater proportion than it was
B.   a greater proportion than
C.   a greater proportion than theyhave been
D.   which is greater than was so
E.    which is greater than it has been
这个比较在比较的是什么? 宾语 ?状语?还是宾语的一个修饰成分?
作者: 安然向人    时间: 2011-4-4 21:35
比较的就是不同时间的proportion,而非costs本身。
作者: fengchen318    时间: 2011-4-4 22:04
我怎么觉得是比较costs....
作者: jaze    时间: 2011-4-4 22:07
比较的就是不同时间的proportion,而非costs本身。
-- by 会员 安然向人 (2011/4/4 21:35:55)


proportion 是谁的同位语?
作者: 罔两凝湮    时间: 2011-4-4 22:44
Soaringtelevision costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidentialcampaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previouselection.

A.a greater proportion than it was
B.a greater proportion than
C.a greater proportion than theyhave been
D.which is greater than was so
E.which is greater than it has been
这个比较在比较的是什么? 宾语 ?状语?还是宾语的一个修饰成分?
-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/4 21:27:37)




Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,  a greater proportion than (that) in any previous election
that指的就是proportion        B
作者: jaze    时间: 2011-4-5 08:04
Soaringtelevision costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidentialcampaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previouselection.

A.a greater proportion than it was
B.a greater proportion than
C.a greater proportion than theyhave been
D.which is greater than was so
E.which is greater than it has been
这个比较在比较的是什么? 宾语 ?状语?还是宾语的一个修饰成分?
-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/4 21:27:37)





Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,  a greater proportion than (that) in any previous election
that指的就是proportion        B
-- by 会员 罔两凝湮 (2011/4/4 22:44:04)



恩, 好像应该是这样, 感觉这道题和以前的思维不一样, 以前的都是主语啊, 宾语啊, 状语啊在比较, 这里的是同位语,
但不是同位语的比较, 而是用一个抽象名词来代替前面的部分, 然后对不同时期的proportion进行比较
还有一个问题没有明白, 同位语不是只能代替前面出现过的名词吗? 这里proportion 代替的是哪个名词啊?
more than half 不是形容词吗?
作者: 罔两凝湮    时间: 2011-4-5 19:12
Soaringtelevision costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidentialcampaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previouselection.

A.a greater proportion than it was
B.a greater proportion than
C.a greater proportion than theyhave been
D.which is greater than was so
E.which is greater than it has been
这个比较在比较的是什么? 宾语 ?状语?还是宾语的一个修饰成分?
-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/4 21:27:37)






Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,  a greater proportion than (that) in any previous election
that指的就是proportion        B
-- by 会员 罔两凝湮 (2011/4/4 22:44:04)




恩, 好像应该是这样, 感觉这道题和以前的思维不一样, 以前的都是主语啊, 宾语啊, 状语啊在比较, 这里的是同位语,
但不是同位语的比较, 而是用一个抽象名词来代替前面的部分, 然后对不同时期的proportion进行比较
还有一个问题没有明白, 同位语不是只能代替前面出现过的名词吗? 这里proportion 代替的是哪个名词啊?
more than half 不是形容词吗?
-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/5 8:04:03)



同位语中有一个是,用一个概括性的词来代替前面的名词或名词短语,这里指代的就是soraing television costs 吧,有点像one的用法,不知道我理解的对不对~
作者: jaze    时间: 2011-4-5 19:17
这个我也不知道啊, 对同位语没有研究
作者: z53495532    时间: 2012-12-5 20:42
这个同位语 是做概括性词语总结前面整句话的效果,因为 GWD的解释里说A选项的IT 不能指代前面这句话,因为就是前面整个句子的同位语【其实就是这个句子】在跟后面的内容比。 而且IT 硬要指代的话,也只能指代costs, 很明显单复数不一致。
作者: 九尾    时间: 2012-12-5 20:48
Soaringtelevision costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidentialcampaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previouselection.

A.a greater proportion than it was
B.a greater proportion than
C.a greater proportion than theyhave been
D.which is greater than was so
E.which is greater than it has been
这个比较在比较的是什么? 宾语 ?状语?还是宾语的一个修饰成分?
-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/4 21:27:37)









Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992,  a greater proportion than (that) in any previous election
that指的就是proportion        B
-- by 会员 罔两凝湮 (2011/4/4 22:44:04)







恩, 好像应该是这样, 感觉这道题和以前的思维不一样, 以前的都是主语啊, 宾语啊, 状语啊在比较, 这里的是同位语,
但不是同位语的比较, 而是用一个抽象名词来代替前面的部分, 然后对不同时期的proportion进行比较
还有一个问题没有明白, 同位语不是只能代替前面出现过的名词吗? 这里proportion 代替的是哪个名词啊?
more than half 不是形容词吗?
-- by 会员 jaze (2011/4/5 8:04:03)






同位语中有一个是,用一个概括性的词来代替前面的名词或名词短语,这里指代的就是soraing television costs 吧,有点像one的用法,不知道我理解的对不对~
-- by 会员 罔两凝湮 (2011/4/5 19:12:04)




同位语不一定要找到前面的名词来进行同位操作,而可以对前文含义进行总结,这里的proportion(比例)指的是Soaring television costs(的比例)
举个栗子吧:I travelled to XI'AN last summer,a great experience ........... 这里的experience就是指那段去西安旅游的经历。。




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3