ChaseDream

标题: 另外一道整体 [打印本页]

作者: 雪落无声 时间: 2004-6-2 01:30
标题: 另外一道整体

Q40:

Until mow, only injectable vaccines against influenza have been available. arents are reluctant to subject children to the pain of injections, but adults, who are at risk of serious complications from influenza, are commonly vaccinated. A new influenza vaccine, administered painlessly in a nasal spray, is effective for children. However, since children seldom develop serious complications from influenza, no significant public health benefit would result from widespread vaccination of children using the nasal spray.

Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

Any person who has received the injectable vaccine can safely receive the nasal-spray vaccine as well.

The new vaccine uses the same mechanism to ward off influenza as jnjectable vaccines do.

The injectable vaccine is affordable for all adults.

Adults do not contract influenza primarily from children who have influenza.

The nasal spray vaccine is mot effective when administered to adults.

No children will use new vaccination-àno economic application of such vaccination

排除他因：adult will not use new vaccination either

这样的逻辑有什么错

答案D，想不通啊

作者: GreenHorse 时间: 2004-6-2 02:11
这道题属于不用看选项就知道要ASSUME什么, 只有一个可能, 小孩的感冒不传染给大人, 所以小孩免疫好处不大. 仔细看题目最后一句话.

作者: 叮当 时间: 2004-6-2 04:15

Agree with GreenHorse!

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)