ChaseDream

标题: PREP07 41 这道题A选项为什么不对呢 [打印本页]

作者: xiaoxiaomi 时间: 2011-4-3 00:01
标题: PREP07 41 这道题A选项为什么不对呢

41.(32917-!-item-!-188;#058&006462)

In the two years following the unification of Germany in 1989, the number of cars owned by residents of East Germany and the total distance traveled by cars in East Germany both increased by about 40 percent.In those two years, however, the number of East German residents killed each year as car occupants in traffic accidents increased by about 300 percent.

Which of the following, if true, most helps to explain the disproportionate increase in traffic fatalities?

(A) The average number of passengers per car was higher in the years before unification than it was in the two years after.

(B) After unification, many people who had been living in East Germany relocated to West Germany.

(D) Drivers who had driven little or not at all before 1989 accounted for much of the increase in the total distance traveled by cars.

(E) Over the same two-year period in East Germany, other road users, such as motorcyclists, bicyclists, and pedestrians, experienced only small increases in traffic fatalities.

作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-4-3 01:13
If A is right, then the people killed in car accidents in East Germany should be dropping now in 1991 than in 1989.

作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-4-3 01:15
D on the other hand, explains the paradox very well. Inexperienced drivers, who accounted for the bulk of the increase in mileages, were prone to accidents.

作者: xiaoxiaomi 时间: 2011-4-3 22:40
(⊙o⊙)…为什么91比89少

作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-4-4 00:43
Two car accidents. The one in 1989 involved 10 people since each car contained 5 people on average. The one in 1991 involved 8 people since each car contained 4 people on average.

(A) The average number of passengers per car was higher in the years before unification (1989) than it was in the two years after (1991).

作者: gots 时间: 2011-4-4 10:07
a说
89年人/车>91年人/车
因此，假设事故车一样多
89年死人>91年死人，与题目信息矛盾
我认为楼主应该是题做多之后看反了

作者: longee 时间: 2011-4-4 10:44
楼主看题没有看清楚呀，A很容易排除的。我们以后看题都要两眼放光芒呀哈哈哈

作者: xiaoxiaomi 时间: 2011-4-4 22:45
我我我。。。我忏悔。。。我看反了。。。感谢大神

作者: chenyue0610 时间: 2011-4-24 21:56
这个题真是太神奇了，我也看反了，怎么还会有这种效应。

作者: fogywind 时间: 2011-5-3 12:36
我勒个去，我也看反了

作者: gots 时间: 2011-5-4 21:33
因为A选项是从后向前说的

作者: cptbtptp 时间: 2011-5-13 19:26
我也看反了。。。

作者: vincent1234 时间: 2011-7-26 22:43
我做了两遍
都看反了。。。

作者: hwwxhxx 时间: 2011-8-20 09:53
顶一个。。我也看反了。。。

作者: bonfin 时间: 2011-10-30 13:53
。。。不认真审题，，，

作者: onlysilence222 时间: 2011-10-30 15:16
我当时也看反了……因为心理期待是91比89多……

作者: zoeant 时间: 2011-11-20 11:15
我也看反了。。看着头几个词就义不容辞的选了A，太坑爹了。

作者: 若雪 时间: 2012-1-3 11:34
看反+1.GMAC你可以再坑爹一点么- -！

作者: xiaoyiyiyiyi 时间: 2012-2-1 18:51
顶一个！同看反！= =

作者: dreamistrue 时间: 2012-5-12 07:02
我也看反了！！

作者: yakev6 时间: 2012-5-27 23:36

me 2

作者: sailingqiong 时间: 2012-5-28 19:17
标题: 这个题应该选什么我咋觉得选E呢
这个题应该选什么我咋觉得选E呢

作者: berylduanduan 时间: 2012-10-25 00:09
我也看反了~~~这是闹哪样~~！！！！

作者: susanchen1013 时间: 2012-11-22 16:06
同看反，自挖双目哇。。。

作者: joyzhang1990 时间: 2012-12-6 17:29
看反了哇

作者: 萤火虫把夜烧了 时间: 2013-4-29 23:19
厄。。。当时同看反的飘过。。。

作者: xushi19911011 时间: 2013-5-18 22:22
我也看反了。。。。主要是逻辑这么耍人的不多见。。。

作者: ManuYZ 时间: 2020-3-20 05:55
我也看反。。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)