ChaseDream

标题: 白勇语法全解上的几个不懂的题,恳请各位大侠解答 [打印本页]

作者: bhchka    时间: 2011-4-2 13:59
标题: 白勇语法全解上的几个不懂的题,恳请各位大侠解答
1. For members of the seventeenth-century Ashanti nation in Africa, animal-hide shields with wooden frames were essential items of military equipment,a method to protect warriors against enemy arrows and spears.
这一题的(E)选项是 to  protect
我不知道为什么是错的,书上的讲解是:sth. is a military equipment ,表示一种状态,“sth. 是一种军事装备,目的是为了保护······”,“状态的目的”逻辑意思不合理,应该是“动作的目的”。
这个讲解是什么意思呢,to do sth. 不是动作的目的吗,求解!!!!
2  In June of 1987,  The Bridge of Trinquetaille, Vincent van Gough's view fo an iron bridge over the Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
(A) Rhone sold for $20.2 milion and it was
(B) Rhone ,which sold for $20.2 million , was
(C) Rhone, was sold for $20.2 million,
(D) Rhone was sold for $20.2 million, being
(E) Rhone, sold for $20.2 million ,and was
这一题应该怎么选呢
作者: 毛毛的臭脚丫    时间: 2011-4-2 14:05
第一题貌似不定式不能跟在逗号后面
作者: anshanada    时间: 2011-4-2 14:31
第2题是不是E啊,那个分词短语可以避免歧义,逻辑主语为主句主语,and前后并列主语一致省略。。。。
作者: bhchka    时间: 2011-4-2 14:56
第二题选C
作者: laria_line    时间: 2011-4-2 20:53
第一题是这样的:
首先要明白 ,to do...这种形式是可以的,也就是说to do可以接在逗号后,这时候to do是做目的状语,修饰之前整个句子。第一题中逗号之前的句子是sth. is a military equipment,所以to do是修饰这整个句子的。逻辑上不通。

其次,题中的a method to protect是一个appositive,即同位语,同位语用来修饰名词a military equipment,是说这种军事装备是用来保护的方法,逻辑就通啦。

说到底是修饰句子和修饰名词的区别。
作者: laria_line    时间: 2011-4-2 21:03
第二题还是关于同位语
句子结构是:
(In June of 1987, ) The Bridge of Trinquetaille, (Vincent van Gough's view of an iron bridge over the Rhone,) was sold for $20.2 million (the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction).

简化完就是:
The Bridge of Trinquetaille was sold for $20.2 million.
梵高的那句话是对The Bridge of Trinquetaille的进一步解释,是它的同位语。
而the second highest price..那句是对$20.2 million的进一步解释,是它的同位语。

总之,两逗号中间的同位语省略不看,句子结构就出来了。
作者: bhchka    时间: 2011-4-2 21:06
谢谢各位的详细解答,多谢了




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3