ChaseDream

标题: 求助 GWD-29-Q14 [打印本页]

作者: adelinely 时间: 2011-3-27 13:46
标题: 求助 GWD-29-Q14

GWD-29-Q14
In 1850 Lucretia Mott published her Discourse on Women, arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights and for changes in the married women’s property laws.

A.arguing in a treatise for women to have equal political and legal rights

B.arguing in a treatise for equal political and legal rights for women

C.a treatise that advocates women’s equal political and legal rights

D.a treatise advocating women’s equal political and legal rights

E.a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women

正确答案E.

我搜了以前的帖，没有人回答E中两个for到底是怎么并列的呢？这个地方也有并列的混淆呀！可以是argue for 。。。and for。。。但是也可以是for women 。。。and for changes呀。这样不就是和B一样的错误了吗！拜托大侠指点！！

作者: clumsy123 时间: 2011-3-27 13:52
好像OG上的题目耶~~
argue for equal political and legal rights...and for changes....这两个并列吧

B的话有其他的错误，我记得OG上说 in a treatise重复了Discourse on Women的意思，没有必要~

作者: angelcity 时间: 2011-6-17 00:05
正好看到这题,OG 38题,E没有什么混淆啊。a treatise that argued for equal political and legal rights for women and for changes in the married women’s property laws.
即使LZ理解成为women去argue平等权和合法权，或者理解成：argue women的平等权和合法权，也是一样的啊。
至于B，OG说“Arguing in a treatise is redundant and awkward” redundant-是指前面已经说了LM 发表了她关于演说说，在论述中她……。前面已经说了演说，后面还说“在论述中”是redundant。
至于awkward，OG中说了 “dusciyrse was a treatuse，it is redundant and confusing to present her as both publishing her discourse and arguing in a treatise”

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)