标题: og12-sc-121 E选项 不理解不理解吖 [打印本页] 作者: aimeedoudou 时间: 2011-3-21 09:50 标题: og12-sc-121 E选项 不理解不理解吖 121. Sales of wines declined in the late 1980s, but they began to grow again after the 1991 report that linked moderate consumption of alcohol, and particularly of red wine, with a reduced risk of heart disease. (A) they began to grow again after the 1991 report that linked moderate consumption of alcohol, and particularly of red wine, with a reduced risk of heart disease （正确选项）
(E) a reduced risk of heart disease linked to moderate alcohol consumption in a 1991 report, and in particular red wine, started them growing again 对于E我不能理解og给出的官方解释： Th e incorrect placement of the modifi er in a 1991 report suggests that wine is being consumed (albeit in moderation) in the report itself. 我怎么也不能体会它这个解释说明的问题在什么地方？怎么能够体会出wine is being consumed in the report itself？？？？ 请求NN的支援，谢谢啦 作者: Gail小M 时间: 2011-3-22 14:18
OG经常会有这样略别扭的解释..先看原文表达 moderate alcohol consumption in a 1991 report..我们用理解当然知道是一个报告，然后给出了一个结果
但是不看含义 上述表达就像是consumption in (a 1991 report)...
其实你不要去想“wine is being consumed in the report itself”这种东西 其实Og的意思就是它表达不清 有修饰歧义 歧义被它ao出来的意思都是很古怪的...作者: joelee1991 时间: 2011-7-17 18:48
噢噢，谢谢昂。我也有这个疑惑~作者: nemiah 时间: 2011-7-17 20:20
所以地点的介词状语还是紧接被修饰的动词比较好。。作者: zhongshanlh 时间: 2012-4-11 13:31
但是地点状语紧跟其修饰的动词也会引起问题，比如有一个题目是claim from a report...vs claim that from a report...OG就说第一个结构会引起逻辑含义上的错误。所以这个东西不能绝对化