ChaseDream

标题: 求助曼哈顿语法上一题,请牛牛们为我这个菜鸟解答一下吧~ [打印本页]

作者: 蚊子小猴    时间: 2011-3-14 10:01
标题: 求助曼哈顿语法上一题,请牛牛们为我这个菜鸟解答一下吧~
Although William Pereira first gained national recognition for his movie set designs, including those for the 1942 film "Reap the Wild Wind",future generations remember him as the architect for the Transamerica Tower, the Malibu campus of Pepperdine University and the city of Irvine.

A:including those for the 1942 film "Reap the Wild Wind",future generations

B: like that for the 1942 film "Reap the Wild Wind",future generations will

C:like those for the 1942 film "Reap the Wild Wind",future generations

D: including that for the 1942 film "Reap the Wild Wind",future generations will

E:including those for the 1942 film "Reap the Wild Wind",future generations will





这道题ABC三个选项我都根据will,including给很快排出了,我的答案是D正确答案是EDE一比较就发现又是代词问题。我理解的是including后面指代的是recognition,因为including是现在分词,现在分词作伴随状语时的主语是前面主句的逻辑主语,特别是原句中those后面还跟了一个for根前面的recognition for刚好对应,所以我认定为recognition



但是答案说including后面应该接的是designs,所以应该用those这让我很想不通。

麻烦各位大牛帮我解答一下,我的代词问题真的是混乱到极点,一遇到代词问题我就束手无策~麻烦大牛们顺便介绍一下你们代词指代对象判断的方法呀~

不胜感激!!!

作者: nightingale    时间: 2011-3-14 12:02
including是介词。
而且根据句意来说,应该是:WP首次因为电影布景设计,包括在1942年电影“Reap the Wild Wind”中的布景设计,而获得国内的知名度。
肯定不是因为在这电影里的知名度而获得国内的知名度啊。
作者: 蚊子小猴    时间: 2011-3-14 12:21
后来想了一下,根据语义来说,确实应该选E,可是还是在逻辑主语方面有些疑问。
including是介词?我查了一下include, 是动词哪,加ING就是介词了么?
作者: nightingale    时间: 2011-3-14 12:59
直接查including
作者: powers    时间: 2011-3-14 20:37
首先必须是will remember,排除AC
like不能引导句子,排除B
that不能引导designs,排除D

就只能选E
作者: powers    时间: 2011-3-14 20:41
插入语修饰最近的名词,dangling modifiers are always incorrect
作者: geegee    时间: 2011-3-14 20:51
future generations remember,这里用一般现在时确实牵强,加will更好些-----从整个句子的意思考虑,我觉得加would更好些,而不是will。一般过去时一下子到一般将来时,感觉怪异。those 没有问题,是those designs的省略。
作者: 蚊子小猴    时间: 2011-3-15 08:57
感谢大家的回复呀~ 这道题懂啦!
作者: EMMALIULIU    时间: 2011-12-21 00:41
Manhattan上说like cannot introduce examples,such as must be used。这是为啥呢?啥时候like不能介绍例子了?
作者: wendyhuang0206    时间: 2012-8-24 02:07
这个问题好久了,对原作者可能没有用了,贴个解释的链接上来供后来人使用吧http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/although-william-pereira-first-gained-national-recognition-t3005.html
作者: 风飘月    时间: 2013-1-23 11:03
这个问题好久了,对原作者可能没有用了,贴个解释的链接上来供后来人使用吧http://www.manhattangmat.com/forums/although-william-pereira-first-gained-national-recognition-t3005.html
-- by 会员 wendyhuang0206 (2012/8/24 2:07:07)



好人
作者: 风飘月    时间: 2013-1-23 11:18
Yes, your reasoning is incorrect. Use of "those" here does not imply that all movies have multiple set designs, but it does imply that this movie had multiple set designs. Unless it is clear that this is not true, there is no reason to question the use of "those". On the other hand, "that" is very definitely inappropriate here, because there is no appropriate singular antecedent for "that" to refer to. If the movie in question in fact had only one set design and that needed to be conveyed, it would therefore be impossible to use a pronoun at all here and you would have to use "the set design" rather than "that" or "those"..

这个解释回答了一个电影一个布景设计或者几个布景设计的问题




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3