ChaseDream

标题: 探讨gigi的in>and>of理论。 [打印本页]

作者: juan 时间: 2004-5-28 08:12
标题: 探讨gigi的in>and>of理论。

15. Acid rain and snow result from the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides with atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids.

(A) with atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids

(B) with atmospheric water vapor producing highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids

(D) and atmospheric water vapor which have produced sulfuric and nitric acids which are highly corrosive （E）

(E) and atmospheric water vapor to produce highly corrosive sulfuric and nitric acids

按照gigi的理论,这里的the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides 很容易被理解成the chemical reactions between (industrial emissions of sulfur dioxide) and (nitrogen oxides)......而其实这里应该是the chemical reactions between industrial emissions of (sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides)...... 所以我觉得作题时还是得结合逻辑意思和实际情况(比如这题得结合固定搭配between...and 来考虑)才能判断清楚 A of B的归属问题.大家觉得呢?

请指教.

作者: scots 时间: 2004-5-28 08:54

同意！！有同感~~~

作者: juan 时间: 2004-5-28 09:10
昨天看了gigi 的一番讲解,颇为佩服,还以为因此可以彻底攻克一大SC难题....今天再结合实际例子演练演练,感觉又被打回了原形.....颇为居丧....看来SC还是以理解逻辑意思为重啊...

作者: jnlvo 时间: 2004-5-28 12:57
同意！个人感觉考试时仅凭语法知识就能做出的题少之又少。

作者: cmtn 时间: 2004-5-28 13:22

以下是引用juan在2004-5-28 9:10:00的发言：
昨天看了gigi 的一番讲解,颇为佩服,还以为因此可以彻底攻克一大SC难题....今天再结合实际例子演练演练,感觉又被打回了原形.....颇为居丧....看来SC还是以理解逻辑意思为重啊...

I have the same feeling

作者: scots 时间: 2004-5-28 14:12

仔细琢磨，只追求语法结构的正确，而不注意句子意思的正确，本身就是的舍本逐末哦~~~~~语法不过是建立语意的基础而已~~RIGHT？

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)