标题: 逻辑求解。。。谢谢 [打印本页] 作者: unimelb86 时间: 2011-3-11 22:52 标题: 逻辑求解。。。谢谢 Raymond Burr played the role of lawyer Perry Mason on television. Burr’s death in 1993 prompted a prominent lawyer to say “Although not a lawyer, Mr. Burr strove for such authenticity that we feel as if we lost one of our own.” This comment from a prestigious attorney provides appalling evidence that, in the face of television, even some legal professionals are losing their ability to distinguish fiction from reality. The reasoning in the argument is flawed because the argument
(A) takes the views of one lawyer to represent the views of all lawyers (B) criticizes the lawyer rather than the lawyer’s statement (C) presumes that the lawyer is qualified to evaluate the performance of an actor (D) focuses on a famous actor’s portrayal of a lawyer rather than on the usual way in which lawyers are portrayed on television (E) ignores the part of the lawyer’s remark that indicates an awareness of the difference between reality and fiction
Answer E.. WHY WHY WHY????作者: ossan 时间: 2011-3-13 18:06
这是狒狒逻辑上的题 abcd说的错误argument都没有犯啊作者: cycyang 时间: 2011-3-13 21:11
From the comments of the prominent lawyer, we can draw a conclusion that at least this lawyer himself is aware of the difference between the reality and fiction. It is a way to complement Burr's acting skills. If so, it will contradict the statement "...losing their ability to distinguish..."作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-3-13 21:28
The key is to note "Although not a lawyer . . ."作者: ruirui_hsu 时间: 2011-7-13 21:50 标题: sdcar2010快来解答....呵呵 sd2010...这个题还是没懂...作者: nemiah 时间: 2011-7-13 22:29
其实comments已经提到although not a lawyer, 表示 已经知道这个difference了。