标题: OG SC47 GMAT解释是伴随，XDF解释是因果。。到底是什么 [打印本页] 作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-3-4 15:32 标题: OG SC47 GMAT解释是伴随，XDF解释是因果。。到底是什么 47. Five ?edgling sea eagles left their nests in western Scotland this summer, bringing to 34 the number of wild birds successfully raised since transplants from Norway began in 1975. (A) bringing (B) and brings (C) and it brings (D) and it brought (E) and brought
这一题大家帮忙解释一下。。。我被GMAT和XDF弄糊涂了。。。我判断不出来了。。。。作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-3-4 16:32
。。。。。。没有人帮我解释一下么。。。大哥大姐们。。。。作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-3-4 16:52
伴随结果。作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-3-4 16:56 标题: ，。。。。。。 伴随结果。。。。怎么理解。。。。。GMAT说是同是发生的，但XDF说不是的。。。。作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-3-4 16:59
这题真是让我费解。。。请大侠们给个详细的解释吧。。。。谢谢了。。。作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-3-4 17:16
HELP作者: aeoluseros 时间: 2011-3-7 09:54
umm...lz能把og的解释贴上来吗？作者: sanlingjie 时间: 2011-3-8 10:58
这是OG的解释。。。。。。。 Bringing is the present participle of the verb to bring. As used here, it correctly describes an action that happens at the same time as the acti in the main clause; bringing indicates that the number of wild birds became 34 when the ? ve eagles left their nests. A Correct. h e participle bringing correctly links the two ideas in the sentence. B In this construction, the subject of the second verb must be the same as the subject of the ? rst verb, but ? ve eagles cannot grammatically or logically be the subject of brings. C It brings is the wrong tense. D h ere are too many possible referents for it. E Five eagles can be the grammatical subject of brought, but not the logical one; it was not the eagles themselves but rather the entire action of their leaving their nests that brought the number to 34.作者: rillshiegin 时间: 2011-3-28 17:11
it is the "situation itself" brings XXX as a result作者: hauntedjs 时间: 2012-3-14 09:47
我较倾向于因果，eagle发出action的同时34birds得救，这样不能表示两者之间的关系，相反由action导致的结果更容易说的清楚 记得XDF上面说：SVO,doing两种情况---1伴随，doing修饰S 2结果，doing修饰SVO