Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.
B. it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors
C. appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors
D. appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors
E. appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who
这里D中stunning evidence做前面句子的同位语, 我想请问的是stunning evidence that human......是不是独立主格 ---- stunning evidence + that从句,构成名词+名词结构? 或者.that从句只是修饰evidence的,说明evidence的内容的?
求助.谢谢.
up一下.
谢谢了.
evidence that是个惯用法，that从句是evidence的同位语从句，说明evidence的内容。
答案是D吗？
这里的evidence that不是同位语从句，是指前面发现的东西是后面human ancestors systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed的evidence
同OG 38
38. Scientists have observed large concentrations of heavy-metal deposits in the upper twenty centimeters of Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there.
(A) Baltic Sea sediments, which are consistent with the growth of industrial activity there
(B) Baltic Sea sediments, where the growth of industrial activity is consistent with these findings
(C) Baltic Sea sediments, findings consistent with its growth of industrial activity
(D) sediments from the Baltic Sea, findings consistent with the growth of industrial activity in the area（D）
(E) sediments from the Baltic Sea, consistent with the growth of industrial activity there
All of the choices but D contain ambiguities. In A and B the words which and where appear to refer to sediments, and in E it is not clear what consistent describes. In A, C, and E, there is no logical place to which there or its could refer. In D, the best choice, the phrase sediments from the Baltic Sea tells where the sediments originate, findings provides a noun for consistent to modify, and in the area clearly identifies where the industrial activity is growing.
答案是D.
我也是搞不太清楚stunning evidence that句子中的作用。看了大家的讨论，我觉得应该是stunning evidence做前面句子的同位语，而that....则修饰evidence,说明的是evidence的内容.这样理解对吗?请指教.谢谢了.
evidence that是个惯用法，that从句是evidence的同位语从句，说明evidence的内容。
答案是D吗？
答案是D. 我觉得stunning evidence that做前面句子是同位语是没错的.
只是不太明白evidence和that从句的关系.看了大家的讨论,我觉得应该是that从句修饰 evidence,说明 evidence的内容,对吗?
请指教.谢谢大家的回复.
BTW:特别感谢tianwan的短消息.我一起床就看见了,马上上来看大家的回复.谢谢你.
这里的stunning evidence是独立主格, 用以囊跨前句整句涵义, 若说成同位语就不太对....
因为同位语不可指代前句: Mary, one of my friends, goes shoping........
至于后面的evidence that 的用法如同tianwan讲的一样....是个固定用法.....
楼上说做believed的宾语, 个人觉得不妥, 因为这里是believed和hunted平行构成两动作的比较结构,
共用主语ancestors和谓语big game
是同位语结构，
这道题目本来很简单，前面有个appear会混淆视线
哎
stunning 是形容词修饰evidence后面的that引导同位语，解释说明evidence
没什么独立主格结构（独立主格结构可不是这个样子的）
GMAT当中是基本比较少独立主格结构的
不要把日常英文混淆到GMAT考试中来
偶觉得吧
偶很少来讨论区看帖子
不是不愿意来
只是有时候看见你们讨论心里真的很着急
总是觉得很多讨论不在TRACK上
大家加油
所谓独立主格结构通俗的说是
两个句子中间没连词（有连词就是从句拉），句子主语又不一样（一样，其中一个句子可以改成分词了）
所以把其中一个句子的谓语变成分词形式
最简单的例子
It being sunday, I go out fo a picnic.(独立主格）
It is sunday and I go out for a picnic（用连词的）
这个句子不可能用分词结构的，因为第一个句子的逻辑主语是IT第二是I 不可能一致
原题的stunning是形容次表震惊的
| 欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.3 |