ChaseDream

标题: 【跪求解答】GWD-TN-1 Q16 [打印本页]

作者: 可卡其蓝 时间: 2011-3-1 20:12
标题: 【跪求解答】GWD-TN-1 Q16
4月二战，11月的一战让我很不明智的昏过去了……所以，这次要好好问~！望大家帮忙~~谢谢~~~

GWD1-Q16:

Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.

?a greater proportion than it was

?a greater proportion than

?a greater proportion than they have been

?which is greater than was so

?which is greater than it has been

答案是B，而我选的是A，后来看了一下，是因为COSTS是要用复数形式的，所以A选项的It was就不能选吗？那如果A选项是They were，还能不能选A呢？

作者: cocoloop 时间: 2011-3-1 21:28
Soaring television costs accounted for a greater proportion than they had (accounted for)in any previous election.

作者: gwang5 时间: 2011-3-3 00:10
问题不是在于COSTS，那个Portion指的是Half of the spending里的half。

作者: ran2010zx 时间: 2011-3-3 08:52
这里commas后面类似于同谓语，是在说明前面的那个那个costs

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)