ChaseDream

标题: OG12 129关于with 求教~~~谢谢大家!!! [打印本页]

作者: 萌感觉    时间: 2011-2-27 03:20
标题: OG12 129关于with 求教~~~谢谢大家!!!
Cajuns speak a dialect brought to southern louisiana by the 4,000 Acadians who migrated there in 1755;their language is basically seventeenth-century  French to which has been added English, Spanish ,and Italian words.
A to which has been added English, Spanish ,and Italian words
B added to which is English, Spanish ,and Italian words
C to which English, Spanish ,and Italian words have been added
D with English, Spanish ,and Italian words having been added to it
E and,in addition, English, Spanish ,and Italian words are added.

本题选C,所有解释选项我都看懂了,唯独这个with
OG的解释是With does not concisely modify the noun French
我知道D中having been added to it是错的,想请教一下这个with为什么不能修饰FRENCH呐?with的类似用法是什么呐?

谢谢大家!!!
作者: zhyanqun    时间: 2011-2-27 03:56
With 的介词结构可以修饰名词, 例如: A book with a green cover. with表示:having, processing or carrying的意思,表述前面名词的某种属性,但在这个题目里,这样讲不通。
另外with介词结构还可以修饰谓语动词,显然在这里也不是这种用法。
作者: 萌感觉    时间: 2011-2-27 04:25
With 的介词结构可以修饰名词, 例如: A book with a green cover. with表示:having, processing or carrying的意思,表述前面名词的某种属性,但在这个题目里,这样讲不通。
另外with介词结构还可以修饰谓语动词,显然在这里也不是这种用法。
-- by 会员 zhyanqun (2011/2/27 3:56:56)


我还是有点不明白,这里的话,French with 其他三种languages加进去....我怎么觉得它是能够正确修饰French的呐?谢谢呀~
作者: Gail小M    时间: 2011-2-27 20:13
帮你顶下....
1)上面一题:OG的解释是With does not concisely modify the noun French

ignore the word"concisely" and the usage of"  having been added "

我想问"with English, Spanish ,and Italian words having been added to it"这种结构到底可不可以修饰french


2)The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's.

a)    extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
b)    extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
c)    extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were  
d)    extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had  
e)    extinction, now with numbers five times greater than  

Choices  E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon. whyyyy?
作者: 萌感觉    时间: 2011-3-1 02:32
顶一下!
作者: kikuswan    时间: 2011-3-1 21:32
我也在纠结这个题呢,
忽略having done这个明显的错误,此处with结构是做伴随状语的,不能修饰就近名词,同时系表结构又不能用with伴随状语修饰,所以这个选项根本就是错的。。。
个人理解哦~不知道对不对,求指正!谢谢~
作者: aimeedoudou    时间: 2011-3-21 12:30
我也在纠结这个题呢,
忽略having done这个明显的错误,此处with结构是做伴随状语的,不能修饰就近名词,同时系表结构又不能用with伴随状语修饰,所以这个选项根本就是错的。。。
个人理解哦~不知道对不对,求指正!谢谢~
-- by 会员 kikuswan (2011/3/1 21:32:47)

同意楼上的
我觉得with在这里会让人觉得它的主语是their language而不是French
作者: 糖豆mia    时间: 2011-3-21 17:29
回3楼,我是这么理解的,不知道对否,如果不对,请告诉我
with修饰的有歧异,可能是french,也可能是their language
   with结构中不会出现it,否则就与修饰对象重复
than 前后不对称是硬伤,再者语意的重心发生了改变
作者: 布布布布布丁    时间: 2011-11-6 18:14
With 的介词结构可以修饰名词, 例如: A book with a green cover. with表示:having, processing or carrying的意思,表述前面名词的某种属性,但在这个题目里,这样讲不通。另外with介词结构还可以修饰谓语动词,显然在这里也不是这种用法。-- by 会员 zhyanqun (2011/2/27 3:56:56)
麻烦举个with修饰动词的例子吧。。这个不明白的说
作者: vinbobo    时间: 2011-11-6 20:53
With 的介词结构可以修饰名词, 例如: A book with a green cover. with表示:having, processing or carrying的意思,表述前面名词的某种属性,但在这个题目里,这样讲不通。另外with介词结构还可以修饰谓语动词,显然在这里也不是这种用法。-- by 会员 zhyanqun (2011/2/27 3:56:56)
麻烦举个with修饰动词的例子吧。。这个不明白的说
-- by 会员 布布布布布丁 (2011/11/6 18:14:20)



with如果后面直接加名词,不构成独立主格,则就是修饰前面的动作
逗号加上介词词组,是作为副词修饰前面的动作的,因为前面的动作是主语发出,所以需要与逻辑主语保持一致,但并不是意味着修饰主语

with的独立主格,则认为是修饰整个句子。我个人感觉其实和上面的例子一样。因为都是状语。
此外,with在这里不可能修饰language,除非再出现一个language的动作




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3