ChaseDream

标题: prep2 47 没讨论过的疑问 [打印本页]

作者: pmoaprikn    时间: 2011-2-14 22:56
标题: prep2 47 没讨论过的疑问
prep2  没讨论过的疑问47.  

Traditionally, decision-making by managers that is reasoned step-by-stephas been considered preferable to intuitive decision-making.  However, a recent study found that topmanagers used intuition significantly more than did most middle- or lower-levelmanagers.  This confirms the alternativeview that intuition is actually more effective than careful, methodicalreasoning.

The conclusion above is based on which of the following assumptions?

(A) Methodical, step-by-step reasoning is inappropriate for making manyreal-life management decisions.
(B) Top managers have the ability to use either intuitive reasoning ormethodical, step-by-step reasoning in making decisions.
(C) The decisions made by middle- and lower-level managers can be made aseasily by using methodical reasoning as by using intuitive reasoning.
(D) Top managers use intuitive reasoning in making the majority of theirdecisions.
(E) Top managers are moreeffective at decision-making than middle- or lower-level managers.



































正确答案为E
透过搭桥法我也了解E很明显补足了gap


想请问各位大牛
这题B错在哪??
小弟在写这题时的思路是用取非削弱
B取非后变成:高阶经理人没有能力用直觉法或是step法做决定
既然她没有办法使用,那不就也没有办法判断哪一项方法有效率
因此削弱了结论(直觉法较有效)
想请问各位我思路哪里错了??
在做题时怎么想比较好??
先谢谢各位了!
作者: jeffreysoon    时间: 2011-2-15 00:22
提示: 作者被禁止或删除 内容自动屏蔽
作者: pmoaprikn    时间: 2011-2-15 15:05

原来坐洛基题不能加入自己的推理阿…..就算高阶经理没有能力,也无法反驳直觉法比按部法好”,因为可能比较好,也可能没有,他没有能力使用及判断!
是这样吧??有错请指正!
我了解了!!谢谢jefferysoon!




欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/) Powered by Discuz! X3.3