ChaseDream

标题: GWD5-Q28 看了历届的帖子，对于BE争论的很久，求路过人帮忙~ [打印本页]

作者: jyw0411lsq 时间: 2011-2-13 15:08
标题: GWD5-Q28 看了历届的帖子，对于BE争论的很久，求路过人帮忙~
GWD5 Q28 逻辑
WD5 Q28 逻辑
Q28: GWD-2-10
Environmentalist: Theuse of snowmobiles in the vast park north of Milville create sun acceptable levels of air pollution and should be banned.
Milville business spokesperson: Snowmobiling brings many out-of-towners to Milville in winter months, to the great financial benefit of many local residents. So, economics dictate that we put up with the pollution.
Environmentalist: I disagree: A great many cross-country skiers are now kept from visiting Milville by the noise and pollution that snowmobiles generate.
Environmentalist responds to the business spokesperson by doing which of the following?

A. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome can derive from only one set of circumstances
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
C. Maintaining that the benefit that the spokesperson desires could be achieved in greater degree by a different means
D. Claiming that the spokesperson is deliberately misrepresenting theenvironmentalist’s position in order to be better able to attack it
E. Denying that an effect that the spokesperson presents as having benefited a certain group of people actually benefited those people

感觉E B 都解释的通啊，答案是E,
可是B说的是消极效果（就是失去的ski-er，造成的经济损失大于那些out-towner带来的经济效益，不也说明Environment的观点么：电动雪橇不好。
求路过人好心看下我这个思路，小女不胜感激~~~！！

作者: sdcar2010 时间: 2011-2-13 22:16
B is not an assumption made in that spokesman's argument.

作者: witty1 时间: 2011-4-19 21:53
标题: GWD5-Q28 看了历届的帖子，对于BE争论的很久，求路过人帮忙~
看过其他人解释后的想法：
B：environmentalists challenge the assumption that后面的内容是assumotion的同位语从句，即business认为好处大于坏处，显然和原文不符。
故排除B项。
E：business认为对城内人（those people）有好处，environmentalists否认，认为对城内人(those people)没好处。

作者: ageng 时间: 2011-7-3 21:59
这题我也选成B了。多读了几遍B后发现好像刚好说反了。
B. Challenging an assumption that certain desirable outcome is outweighed by negative aspects associated with producing that outcome
B:质疑一个假设--随之而来的负面影响盖过了某个有利的结果。
而spokesperson说Snowmobiling会带来好处，所以我们要忍受(put up with)污染。言下之意(assumption)是好处大于坏处。
Environmentalist质疑了这个assumption。其质疑的方式貌似可以说成是“坏处(惧怕噪音不来)大于好处”

GMAC太狡猾了，故意把这样一个偷梁换柱混淆黑白的选项放在第二个，让人先入为主。把对象放在E，让人没心思读！这套题的RC和CR。很多做错的都是因为把选项意思读反。曾以为想法的选项很容易发觉，没想到隐藏如此之深！
不知我想法对否。

作者: lq0 时间: 2011-9-24 16:54
请问A什么意思~~看不懂

作者: 醒醒Shine 时间: 2014-7-3 10:58

ageng 发表于 2011-7-3 21:59
这题我也选成B了。多读了几遍B后发现好像刚好说反了。B.    Challenging an assumption tha ...

谢谢！读懂句意真是王道。

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)