ChaseDream

标题: 求助这道题 [打印本页]

作者: ruiyu25 时间: 2004-5-21 11:56
标题: 求助这道题

In little more than a decade, Argentina has become the world's leading exporter of honery, with nearly 90,000 tons a year sold to foreign market, almost half of which going to US.

B. with the sale of nearly 90,000 tons to foreign market, and almost half of it that goes

C. with the sale to foreign markets of nearly 90,000 tons a year, with almost half of it going

D. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, and almost half of it goes

E. selling nearly 90,000 tons a year to foreign markets, with almost half going

答案A, 我选E, E不好在哪里呢? A中which不会造成歧义修饰前面的foreign market吗? 我就是看到这个,先把A排除了. with引导的成分在这里做壮语,修饰become吗?

In 1981, children in the US spent an average of slightly les than two and a half hours a week doing household chore; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week.

C. chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997.

答案B, why not A?

Thanks a lot.

作者: 日本王八 时间: 2004-5-21 12:50

妹妹答案不是A把, 你的答案怎么老有问题？我认为是E. 第二题：等我想象。

作者: 日本王八 时间: 2004-5-21 13:00
第二题怎么回事B呢？谁给的答案啊，不会是管。。。。？

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2004-5-21 14:36
建议ruiyu25MM尽量把题目贴全,这样也有利于大家系统讨论,象第二题AB的had done似乎都有问题,C的被动也比较奇怪,请问D和E分别是什么?

作者: ruiyu25 时间: 2004-5-21 15:11

sorry, Marie MM, 我现在把第二题补全:

In 1981, children in the US spent an average of slightly les than two and a half hours a week doing household chore; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week.

C. chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997.

D. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997.

E. chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997.

多谢了!

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2004-5-21 15:59

用排除法我选B
A中的they有逻辑问题,似乎在说1981年的那些孩子们到了1997年每周花6小时做家务,这显然不是题目的意思;
C被动有点awkward,而且少了逻辑主语,到底是谁时间做家务?
D前后比较对象不对应
E句子重心完全改变,意思随之产生差异

作者: LES 时间: 2004-5-21 20:22

第1题E不好在with almost half going修饰对象不清楚。

第2题偶选E。偶觉得A，B肯定不对，1981年用过去时，怎么到了1997年反倒要用过去完成时啊？

作者: 日本王八 时间: 2004-5-21 20:56
我印象中第二题，一大大的牛人说是D. 请问6，7 两楼的两位高手妹妹，WHEREAS是不是必须要完全对应主句平衡啊？？？

作者: ruiyu25 时间: 2004-5-22 08:33
还有谁可以解决这两个问题呀？

作者: RachelWang80 时间: 2004-5-22 09:07

第二题我选b

类似og--81

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-22 9:09:46编辑过]

作者: dashasha 时间: 2004-5-22 09:46
第一题选什么？我觉得应该选E，A里面的half of which里的which指代什么不清楚。

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2004-5-22 09:48

第二题的E肯定不对,原句表达的对比意思不见了,独立主格使得对比部分B成了部分A的附属;

之所以说排除法选B是因为觉得B的had done似乎不妥,但是这个过去完成时并不是没有时间标志,因为题中提到了BY 1997.

作者: ruiyu25 时间: 2004-5-22 12:06

第2题的C不好是不是因为被动语态，而且结构与前面不平行，表达意思不够清楚？

作者: mariezhu 时间: 2004-5-22 12:12

以下是引用ruiyu25在2004-5-22 12:06:00的发言：

第2题的C不好是不是因为被动语态，而且结构与前面不平行，表达意思不够清楚？

我觉得是的

作者: LES 时间: 2004-5-22 12:24

以下是引用mariezhu在2004-5-22 9:48:00的发言：

第二题的E肯定不对,原句表达的对比意思不见了,独立主格使得对比部分B成了部分A的附属;

－不明白的说？

之所以说排除法选B是因为觉得B的had done似乎不妥,但是这个过去完成时并不是没有时间标志,因为题中提到了BY 1997.

－过去完成是过去的过去。1981与1997哪个先哪个后？不是说有时间标志词就可以的，时间标志词是反应时间的先后顺序的。

作者: whitedeer 时间: 2004-5-22 13:01
第一题好象答案是E。

作者: 睡熊 时间: 2004-5-23 00:22
第二题答案（B）没有问题。by...要求过去完成时，而前面 in ... 则一定用过去时。时态的选择是由介词短语决定的，前后两句话没有时间的比照关系。

作者: 我爱宝宝 时间: 2004-5-23 01:45

我第一题选e，个人认为ab中第一个with的用法不对，e虽然第二个with也不好，但比较起第一个with似乎还可以原谅

第二题选c，原因认可LESmm，唯一一个没有语法错误的选项

In 1981, children in the US spent an average of slightly les than two and a half hours a week doing household chore; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week.

A，chore; by 1997 they had spent nearly six hours a week第二个分句语法时态与第一个分句时间逻辑混乱，错

B. chores; by 1997 that figure had grown to nearly six hours a week.原因同上

C. chores, whereas nearly six hours a week were spent in 1997.语法正确，逻辑关系通顺

D. chores, compared with a figure of nearly six hours a week in 1997.比较点错误

E. chores, that figure growing to nearly six hours a week in 1997.（在og中有这种分词在句尾+主格的用法吗？，作什么成份？）对这个没有感觉，读起来别扭

请牛牛指正。

作者: ruiyu25 时间: 2004-5-23 01:46
The answer given to the first question is A.

作者: ruiyu25 时间: 2004-5-23 08:41

谁能给第一题确定的答案？大NN门快来帮忙啊

欢迎光临 ChaseDream (https://forum.chasedream.com/)